Skip to main content
Log in

Development and Testing of Interview Questions to Determine Last Menstrual Period in Mexican Immigrant Populations

  • Published:
Journal of Immigrant Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The last menstrual period is used to estimate gestational age. This paper examines sources of measurement error related to the recall of last menstrual period among Mexican immigrant women living in the United States. Qualitative analyses (focus groups and cognitive interviews) suggest that last menstrual period recall does not seem to be a large source of measurement error in the calculation of gestational age and the impact of this type of error on the misclassification of preterm births appears to be minimal. Questions for querying about last menstrual period in this population are offered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. World Health Organization: Antenatal Care. Report of a Technical Working Group; 1994 (WHO/FRH/MSM/96.8)

  2. Zador I, Hertz R, Sokol R, Hirsh V: Sources of error in the estimation of fetal gestational age. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1980; 138(3):344–345

    Google Scholar 

  3. Andersen F, Johnson T, Barclay M, Flora J: Gestational age assessment: Analysis of individual clinical observations. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1981; 139(2):173–177

    Google Scholar 

  4. Andersen F, Johnson T, Barclay M, Flora J: Gestational age assessment: Prediction from combined clinical observations. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1981; 140(7):770–774

    Google Scholar 

  5. Alexander GR, Allen MC: Conceptualization, measurement, and use of gestational age. I. Clinical and public health practice. J Perinatol 1996; 16(1):53–9.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Tunon K, Eik-Nes SH, Grottum P, Von During V, Kahn JA: Gestational age in pregnancies conceived after in vitro fertilization: A comparison between age assessed from oocyte retrieval, crown-rump length and biparietal diameter. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000; 15(1):41–46.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Yang H, Kramer MS, Platt RW, Blondel B, Breart G, Morin I, Wilkins R, Usher R. How does early ultrasound scan estimation of gestational age lead to higher rates of preterm birth? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 186(3):433–437.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Whittaker P, Lind T, Lawson J: A prospective study to compare serum human placental lactogen and menstrual dates for determining gestational age. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987; 156(1):178–182

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kramer M, McLean F, Boyd M, Usher R: The validity of gestational age estimation by menstrual dating in term, preterm, and postterm gestations. JAMA 1988; 260(22):3306–3308

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gjessing H, Skjoerven R, Wilcox A: Errors in gestational age: Evidence of bleeding early in pregnancy. Am J Public Health 1999; 89(2):213–218

    Google Scholar 

  11. Berg A: Menstrual cycle length and the calculation of gestational age. Am J Epidemiol 1991; 133(6):585–589

    Google Scholar 

  12. Buekens P, Notzon F, Kotelchuck N, Wilcox A: Why do Mexican Americans give birth to few low birth weight infants? Am J Epidemiol 2000; 152:347–351

    Google Scholar 

  13. David R: The quality and completeness of birthweight and gestational age data in computerized birth files. Am J Public Health 1980; 70:964–973

    Google Scholar 

  14. Buekens P, Delvoye P, Wollast E, Robyn C: Epidemiology of pregnancies with unknown last menstrual period. J Epidemiol Community Health 1984; 38:79–80

    Google Scholar 

  15. Overpeck M, Hediger M, Zhang J, Trumble AC, Klebanoff MA: Birth weight for gestational age of Mexican American infants born in the United States. Obstet Gynecol 1999; 93:943–947

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hughes D, DuMont K: Using focus groups to facilitate culturally anchored research. Am J Community Psychol 1993; 21(6):775–806

    Google Scholar 

  17. Angel R, Thoits P: The impact of culture on the cognitive structure of illness. Cult Med Psychiatry 1987; 11(4):465–494

    Google Scholar 

  18. Johnson TP, O'Rourke D, Chavez N, Sudman S, Warnecke RB, Horm J: Cultural variations in the interpretation of health survey questions: In: Health Survey Research Methods Conference Proceedings. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 1996:57–62

  19. Marin G, Marin B: Research With Hispanic Populations. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1991

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hines AM: Linking qualitative and quantitative methods in cross-cultural survey research: Techniques from cognitive science. Am J Community Psychol 1993; 21(6):729–746

    Google Scholar 

  21. Weidmer B, Brown J, Garcia L: Translating the cahps 1.0 survey instrument into spanish. Med Care 1999; 37(3):MS89-MS96

    Google Scholar 

  22. Warnecke RB, Johnson TP, Chavez N, Sudman S, O'Rourke DP, Lacey L, Horm J: Improving question wording in surveys of culturally diverse populations. Ann Epidemiol 1997; 7(5):334–342

    Google Scholar 

  23. Johnson TP, O'Rourke D, Chavez N, Sudman S, Warnecke RB, Lacey L, Horm J: Social cognition and responses to survey questions among culturally diverse populations: In: Lyberg L, Biemer P, Collins M, DeLeuw E, Dippo C, Schwarz N, Trewin D, eds. Survey Measurement and Process Quality. New York: John Wiley; 1997:87–113

    Google Scholar 

  24. Côté-Arsenault D, Morrison-Beedy D: Practical advice for planning and conducting focus groups. Nurs Res 1999; 48(5):280–283

    Google Scholar 

  25. Anderson RM, Goddard CE, Garcia R, Guzman JR, Vazquez F: Using focus groups to identify diabetes care and education issues for latinos with diabetes. Diabetes Educ 1998; 24(5):618–625

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wilkinson S. Focus groups in health research: Exploring the meanings of health and illness. J Health Psychol 1998; 3(3):329–348

    Google Scholar 

  27. Marin G, Sabogal F, Marin BV, Otero-Sabogal R, Perez-Stable EJ: Development of a short acculturation scale for hispanics. Hisp J Behav Sci 1987; 9:183–205

    Google Scholar 

  28. English PB, Kharrazi M, Guendelman S: Pregnancy outcomes and risk factors in Mexican Americans: The effect of language use and mother's birthplace. Ethn Dis 1997; 7(3):229–240

    Google Scholar 

  29. Guendelman S, English PB: Effect of United States residence on birth outcomes among Mexican immigrants: An exploratory study. Am J Epidemiol 1995; 142:530–538

    Google Scholar 

  30. NVivo 1.1 for Microsoft Windows [Computer software]. Melbourne, Australia: Qualitative Solutions and Research; 1999

  31. Carey JW, Morgan M, Oxtoby, MJ: The use of respondent and interviewer debriefing studies as a way to study response error in survey data. Statistician 1996; 40:253–264

  32. Singleton RA, Straits BC: Approaches to Social Research. New York; Oxford University Press; 1999

    Google Scholar 

  33. Giachello, A. The reproductive years: The health of Latinas: In: Aguirre-Molina Marilyn, Molina Carlos, Zambrana Ruth, eds. Health Issues in the Latino Community. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2001:107–156

    Google Scholar 

  34. Balcazar H. The prevalence of intrauterine growth retardation in Mexican Americans. Am J Public Health 1994; 84(3):462–465

    Google Scholar 

  35. Frisbie P, Forbes D, Pullum, S. Compromised birth outcomes and infant mortality among racial and ethnic groups. Demography 1996; 33(4):469–481

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pierre Buekens.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Deeb-Sossa, N., Agans, R.P., Butron-Riveros, B.C. et al. Development and Testing of Interview Questions to Determine Last Menstrual Period in Mexican Immigrant Populations. Journal of Immigrant Health 6, 127–136 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOIH.0000030228.55939.8d

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOIH.0000030228.55939.8d

Navigation