Skip to main content
Log in

The SOGS-RA vs. the MAGS-7: Prevalence Estimates and Classification Congruence

  • Published:
Journal of Gambling Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the prevalence rate estimates and congruence in classification status derived from two popular measures of adolescent gambling (SOGS-RA and MAGS-7). Adolescents from three states (Alabama, Mississippi, and Oregon) completed an anonymous questionnaire (n=1846 high school students total). Results indicate that the prevalence of probable adolescent pathological gambling varied both as a function of instrument and cut-off point utilized for classification (range 1.7%–8.2%). Classification groups (non-problem, at-risk, and problem gamblers) generated by both instruments were found to be associated with reports of gambling frequency, amount of money lost in one gambling occasion, and parental gambling problems. However, concern was raised because the MAGS-7 and the SOGS-RA had little congruence in their three-group classification decisions for specific individuals (e.g., only 20.5% agreement for problem gamblers). To improve clinical utility, an empirical case was made for using the SOGS-RA to generate a fourth group of adolescent gamblers, which we labeled “probable pathological gamblers” (SOGS-RA ≥ 6). This group was differentiated from the remaining gambling groups on all the validity indices. The implications and limitations of these findings, as well as future directions, are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • American Psychiatric Association (APA) (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (Fourth edition). Washington, DC: APA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derevensky, J.L., & Gupta, R. (2000). Prevalence estimates of adolescent gambling: A comparison of the SOGS-RA, DSM-IV-J, and the GA 20 questions. Journal of Gambling Studies, 16(2/3), 227–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derevensky, J.L., Gupta, R., & Cioppa, G.D. (1996). A developmental perspective of gambling behavior in children and adolescents. Journal of Gambling Studies, 12, 49–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Govoni, R., Rupcich, N., & Frisch, G.R. (1996). Gambling behavior of adolescent gamblers. Journal of Gambling Studies, 12, 305–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, M., & Wood, R.T.A. (2000). Risk factors in adolescence: The case of gambling, video-game playing, and the internet. Journal of Gambling Studies, 16(2/3), 199–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hraba, J., & Lee, G. (1996). Gender, gambling, and problem gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 12, 83–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, D.F. (1989). Illegal and undocumented: A review of teenage gambling and the plight of children of problem gamblers in America. In H. J. Shaffer, S. Stein, B. Gambino, & T. Cummings (Eds.), Compulsive gambling: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 249–292). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, D. F. (2000). Juvenile gambling in North America: An analysis of long-term trends and future prospects. Journal of Gambling Studies, 16, 119–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, D.N. (1976). Jackson personality inventory manual. Port Huron, MI: Research Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, L.D., O'Malley, P.M., & Bachman, J.G. (1993). National survey results on drug use from monitoring the future study, 1975–1992. NIH Publication 93–3597. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladouceur, R., Bouchard, C., Rheaume, N., Jacques, C., Ferland, F., Leblond, J., & Walker, M. (2000). Is the SOGS an accurate measure of pathological gambling among children, adoles-cents, and adults? Journal of Gambling Studies, 16, 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesieur, H.R., & Blume, S.B. (1987). The South Oaks gambling screen (SOGS): A new instrument for the identification of pathological gamblers. American Journal of Psychiatry, 144, 1184–1188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesieur, H.R., & Klein, R. (1987). Pathological gambling among high school students. Addictive Behaviors, 12, 129–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (1999). Pathological gambling: A critical review. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, H.J., & Hall, M.N. (1996). Estimating the prevalence of adolescent gambling disorders: A quantitative synthesis and guide toward standard gambling nomenclature. Journal of Gambling Studies, 12, 193–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, H.J., Hall, M.N., & Vander Bilt, J. (1997). Estimating the prevalence of disordered gambling in the United States and Canada: A meta-analysis. Project funded by the National Center for Responsible Gambling. Kansas City, MO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, H.J., LaBrie, R., Scanlan, K.M., & Cummings, T.N. (1994). Pathological gambling among adolescents: Massachusetts adolescent gambling screen (MAGS). Journal of Gambling Studies, 10, 339–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winters, K.C., & Anderson, N. (2000). Gambling involvement and drug use among adolescents. Journal of Gambling Studies, 16(2/3), 175–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winters, K.C., Bengston, P., Dorr, D., & Stinchfield, R. (1998). Prevalence and risk factors of problem gambling among college students. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 12, 127–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winters, K.C., Stinchfield, R.D., & Fulkerson, J. (1993). Toward the development of an adolescent gambling problem severity scale. Journal of Gambling Studies, 9, 63–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winters, K.C., Stinchfield, R.D., & Kim, L.G. (1995). Monitoring adolescent gambling in Minnesota. Journal of Gambling Studies, 11, 165–183.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J., Rohling, M.L., Rohde, P. et al. The SOGS-RA vs. the MAGS-7: Prevalence Estimates and Classification Congruence. J Gambl Stud 20, 259–281 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOGS.0000040279.26711.ef

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOGS.0000040279.26711.ef

Navigation