Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

“Family Matters”: A Conceptual Framework for Genetic Testing in Children

  • Published:
Journal of Genetic Counseling

Abstract

Genetic testing in minor children presents a complex ethical and social problem. Current guidelines state that genetic testing of children is recommended only under circumstances where a clear medical or psychosocial benefit to the child can be demonstrated. Because of the difficulty in determining a psychosocial benefit, the discussion about genetic testing of minors ultimately tends to focus on who has the right to make the decision and whose right to autonomy is jeopardized, the parent's or the child's, when there is no identified medical benefit. Historically, a western bioethics paradigm, Principlism, has been used to guide genetic counseling sessions and genetic-testing guidelines for minors. This bioethics paradigm is guided by the principles: respect for autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice. Genetic testing in children, when viewed through a traditional bioethics filter is limited by its focus on the individual because children are not only individuals, they are also integral parts of a larger social context, that of their family. Because this bioethics paradigm places a strong emphasis on individual autonomy, the family's beliefs and values and the parents' concern for their children may be overshadowed by the medical community's attempt to preserve the child's “right” to an autonomous decision about genetic testing. The purpose of this paper is to first discuss the circumstances in which genetic testing of minors occurs and then present a theoretical and ethics-based conceptual framework that may be useful in the development of genetic counseling interventions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anonymous (1987). Consensus conference. Newborn screening for sickle cell disease and other hemoglobinopathies. JAMA, 258, 1205-1209.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Society of Human Genetics/American College of Medical Genetics (1995). Report: Points-to-consider: Ethical, legal, and psychosocial implications of genetic testing in children and adolescents. Am J Hum Genet, 57, 1233-1241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp, T. L. (1994). The ‘four principles’ approach. In R. Gillon ( Ed.), Principles of health care ethics (pp. 2-12). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becvar, N. J., & Becvar, D. S. (1982). Family systems theory: Background and implications. J Commun, 32, 99-107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernhardt, B., Ellen, T., Fraser, G., Wissow, L., & Geller, G. (2003). Parent's and children's attitudes toward the enrollment of minors in genetic susceptibility research: Implications for Informed consent. Am J Med Genet, 116A, 315-322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binedell, J., Solden, J., Scourfield, J., & Harper, P. (1996). Huntington's disease predictive testing: The case for an assessment approach to requests from adolescents. J Med Genet, 33, 912-915.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boss, P. (1988). Family stress management (Vol. 8). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunn, J., Bosompra, K., Ashikaga, T., Flynn, B., & Worden, J. (2002). Factors influencing intention to obtain a genetic test for colon cancer risk: A Population-based study. Preventive Medicine, 34, 567-577.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. W. (2000). Colon cancer screening. Gastroenterology, 119, 837-853.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheuvront, B., Sorensen, J., Callanan, N., Stearns, S., & DeVellis, B. (1998). Psychosocial and educational outcomes associated with home-and clinic-based pretest education and cystic fibrosis carrier testing among a population of at-risk relatives. Am J Med Genet, 75(5), 461-468.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, A. J. (1997). The genetic testing of children. In P. S. Harper & A. J. Clarke (Eds.), Genetics society and clinical practice (pp. 15-29). Herndon, VA: BIOS Scientific.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, A. (Ed.) (1998). The genetic testing of children. Washington, DC: Bios Scientific.

    Google Scholar 

  • Codori, A.-M., Zawacki, K., Petersen, G., Miglioretti, D., Bacon, J., Trimbath, J., et al. (2003). Genetic testing for hereditary colorectal cancer in children: Long-term psychological effects. Am J Med Genet, 116A, 117-128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbetta, C., Seia, M., Bassotti, A., Ambrosioni, A., Guinta, A., & Padoan, R. (2002). Screening for cystic fibrosis in newborn infants: Results of a pilot programme based on a two tier protocol (IRT/DNA/IRT) in the Italian population. Journal of Medical Screening, 9, 60-63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, R. D. (1995). Family-systems theory. In R. D. Day, K. R. Gilbert, B. H. Settles, & W. R. Burr (Eds.), Research and theory in family science (pp. 91-111). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T. (1993). Morally privileged relationships. In D. T. Meyers, K. Kipnis, & C. F. Murphy (Eds.), Kindred matters: Rethinking the philosophy of the family (pp. 21-40). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elger, B. S., & Harding, T. W. (2000). Testing adolescents for a hereditary breast cancer gene (BRCA1): Respecting their autonomy is in their best interest. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, 154, 113-119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evers-Kiebooms, G., & Decruyenaere, M. (1998). Predictive testing for Huntington's disease: A challenge for persons at risk and for professionals. Patient Educ Counsel, 35, 15-26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fanos, J., & Johnson, J. (1992). Still living with cystic fibrosis. The well sibling revisited. Pediatr Pulmonol Suppl, 8, 228-229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fanos, J. H. (1997). Developmental tasks of childhood and adolescence: Implications for genetic testing. Am J Med Genet, 71, 22-28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fanos, J. H., & Gatti, R. A. (1999). A mark on the arm: Myths of carrier status in sibs of individuals with ataxia-telangiectasia. Am J Med Genet, 86, 338-346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fanos, J. H., & Johnson, J. P. (1995). Barriers to carrier testing for adult cystic fibrosis sibs: The importance of not knowing. Am J Med Genet, 59, 85-91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick, M., & Ritchie, L. (Eds.) (1992). Communication theory and the family. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grody, W. W., Cutting, G. R., Klinge, K. W., Richards, C. S., Watson, M. S., Robert J., Desnick, et al. (2001). CF3: Cystic fibrosis carrier screening, laboratory standards and guidelines for population based cystic fibrosis screening. Genet Med, 3(2), 149-154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamann, H., Croyle, R. T., Venne, V. L., Baty, B. J., Smith, K. R., & Botkin, J. R. (2000). Attitudes toward the genetic testing of children among adults in a Utah-based kindred tested for a BRCA1 mutation. Am J Med Genet, 92, 25-32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare, R. M. (1994). Utilitarianism and deontological principles. In R. Gillon (Ed.), Principles of health care ethics (pp. 149-157). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, R. (1958). Social stresses on the family. I. Generic features of families under stress. Soc Casework, 49, 139-150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington's Disease Society of America (1994). Guidelines for genetic testing for Huntington's Disease. New York: Huntington's Disease Society of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarvinen, O., Aalto, A.-M., Lehesjoki, A.-E., Lindlof, M., Soderling, I., Uutela, A., et al. (1999). Carrier testing of children for two X linked diseases in a family based setting: A retrospective long term psychosocial evaluation. J Med Genet, 36, 615-620.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, P. M., & Bennett, M. (2002). The changing face of newborn screening: Diagnosis of inform errors of metabolism by tandem mass spectrometry. Clin Chim Acta, 324, 121-128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kliewer, W., Fearnow, M. D., & Miller, P. A. (1996). Coping socialization in middle childhood: Tests of maternal and paternal influence. Child Dev, 67, 2339-2357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, H. L., & Albers, S. (2000). Genetic screening of newborns. Ann Rev Genom Hum Genet, 1(1), 139-177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, H. & Nelson, J. (1995). The patient in the family: An ethics of medicine and families. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McConkie-Rosell A, Spiridigliozzi GA, Dawson D, Sullivan JA, & Lachiewicz AM. (2002). Carrier testing in fragile X syndrome: When to tell and test. Am J Med Genet, 110, 36-44.

    Google Scholar 

  • McConkie-Rosell, A., Spiridigliozzi, G. A., Iafolla, T., Tarleton, J., & Lachiewicz, A.M. (1997). Carrier testing in the fragile X syndrome. Am J Med Genet, 68, 62-69.

    Google Scholar 

  • McConkie-Rosell, A., Spiridigliozzi, G. A., Rounds, K., Dawson, D., Sullivan, J. A., Burgess, D., et al. (1999). Parental attitudes regarding carrier testing in children at-risk for fragile X syndrome. Am J Med Genet, 82, 206-211.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCubbin, H. I., & Patterson, J. (1982). Family adaptation to crises. In H. I. McCubbin, A. E. Cauble, & J. M. Patterson (Eds.), Family stress, coping, and social support. Springfield, OH: Charles C. Thomas.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCubbin, H. I., Thompson, A. I., & McCubbin, M. A. (1996). Family assessment: Resiliency, coping, and adaptation. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michie, S. (1996). Predictive genetic testing in children: Paternalism or empiricism? In T. Marteau & M. Richards (Eds.), The troubled helix: Social and psychological implications of the new human genetics (pp. 177-183). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michie, S., Bobrow, M., & Marteau, T. M. (2001). Predictive genetic testing in children and adults: a study of emotional impact. J Med Genet, 38, 519-526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michie, S., & Marteau, T. (1996). Predictive genetic testing in children: The need for psychological research. Br J Health Psychol, 1(1), 3-14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, P. A., Kliewer, W., Hepworth, J. T., Sandler, I. N. (1994) Maternal socialization of children's postdivorce coping: Development of a measurement model. J Appl Dev Psychol, 15, 457-487.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKernon, W. L., Holmbeck, G. N., Colder, C. R., Hommeyer, J. S., Shapera, W., & Westhoven, V. (2001). Longitudinal study of observed and perceived family influences on problem-focused coping behaviors of preadolescents with spina bifida. J Pediat Psychol, 26, 41-54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narzi, L., Lucarelli, M., Lelli, A., Grandoni, F., Cicero, S. L., Ferraro, A., et al. (2002). Comparison of two different protocols of neonatal screening for cystic fibrosis. Clin Genet, 91(3), 82-87.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Society of Genetic Counselors (1995). Resolutions ballot: Prenatal and childhood testing for adult-onset disorders. Wallingford, PA: National Society of Genetic Counselors.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Society of Genetic Counselors (1992). Code of ethics. Available at http://www.nsgc.org/about/code of ethics.asp

  • Park, V., Howard-Peebles, P., Sherman, S., Taylor, A., & Wulfsberg, E. (1994). Policy statement: American college of medical genetics: Fragile X syndrome: Diagnostic and carrier testing. Am J Med Genet, 53, 380-381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, J. M., & Garwick, A. W. (1994). Levels of meaning in family stress theory. Fam Proc, 33, 287-304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, G., Slack, J., & Nakamura, Y. (1991). Screening guidelines and premorbid diagnosis of familial adenomatous polyposis using linkage. Gastroenterology, 100, 1658-1664.

    Google Scholar 

  • Report of the Working Party of the Clinical Genetics Society (1994). The genetic testing of children. J Med Genet, 31, 785-797.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, M. (1998). Annotation: Genetic research, family life, and clinical practice. J Child Psychol Psychiatry, 39(3), 291-305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, S., & Savulescu, J. (2001). Is there a case in favor of predictive genetic testing in young children? Bioethics, 15, 26-49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, L., & Moon, M. (2000). Ethical issues in genetic testing of children. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, 154, 873-879.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, S., & Harper, P. S. (2001). Prenatal testing for Huntington's disease: Experience within the UK 1994–1998. J Med Genet, 38, 333-335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. (1993). Family responsibility and the nature of obligation. In D. T. Meyers, K. Kipnis, & C. F. Murphy (Eds.), Kindred matters: Rethinking the philosophy of the family (pp. 74-89). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, H. W., & Miles, R. (1999). Moral direction in genetic counseling: Prenatal testing and Huntington disease. Fam Sys Health, 17, 75-85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tercyak, K., Peshkin, B., Streisand, R., & Lerman, C. (2001a). Psychological issues among children of hereditary breast cancer gene (BRCA1/2) testing participants. Psycho-Oncology, 10, 336-346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tercyak, K., Hughes, C., Main, D., Snyder, C., Lynch, J., Lynch, H., et al. (2001b). Parental communication of BRCA1/2 genetic test results to children. Patient Educ Counsel, 42, 213-224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varekamp, I., Suurmeijer, T., Brocker-Vriends, A., Dijck, H. V., Smit, C., Rosendaal, F., et al. (1990). Carrier testing and prenatal diagnosis for hemophilia: Experiences and attitudes of 549 potential and obligate carriers. Am J Med Genet, 37, 147-154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertz, D. C., Fanos, J. H., & Reilly, P. R. (1994). Genetic testing for children and adolescents—Who decides? J Am Med Assoc, 272(11), 875-881.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, P., Smith, R., Dorkin, H., Parad, R., Comeau, A., & Bianchi, D. (2001). Genetic counseling after implementation of statewide cystic fibrosis newborn screening: Two years' experience in one medical center. Genet Med, 3(6), 411-415.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, J. M., & Klein, D. M. (2002). Family theories. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolpe, P. R. (1998). The triumph of autonomy in American bioethics: A sociological view. In R. DeVries & J. Subedi (Eds.), Bioethics and society: Constructing the ethical enterprise (pp. 38-59). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina

    Allyn McConkie-Rosell

  2. Department of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina

    Gail A. Spiridigliozzi

Authors
  1. Allyn McConkie-Rosell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gail A. Spiridigliozzi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Allyn McConkie-Rosell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McConkie-Rosell, A., Spiridigliozzi, G.A. “Family Matters”: A Conceptual Framework for Genetic Testing in Children. Journal of Genetic Counseling 13, 9–29 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOGC.0000013379.90587.ef

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOGC.0000013379.90587.ef

Search

Navigation