Journal of Family Violence

, Volume 19, Issue 5, pp 279–289 | Cite as

Risk Factors for Male Sexual Aggression on College Campuses

  • Joetta L. Carr
  • Karen M. VanDeusen


Risk factors for college male sexual aggression that were both theoretically and empirically based were tested using multivariate regression analyses. These included substance abuse patterns, pornography consumption, negative gender-based attitudes, and child sexual abuse experiences. Regression analyses indicated that some gender attitudes, pornography use, and alcohol abuse were significant predictors of perpetration of sexual violence. Although a number of men were sexually abused as children, this risk factor did not predict sexual aggression as an adult. Many men reported alcohol-related sexual coercion and held many rape-supportive attitudes and beliefs. These practices by college men contribute to the prorape cultures found on many campuses. Strategies are needed to identify and intervene with high-risk men to prevent sexual victimization of women in college.

risk factors male perpetration college rape 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abbey, A. (1991). Acquaintance rape and alcohol consumption on college campuses: How are they linked? J. Am Coll Health 39: 165–169.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Abbey, A., McAuslan, P., Zawacki, T., Clinton, A., and Buck, P. (2001). Attitudinal, experiential, and situational predictors of sexual assault perpetration. J. Interpers. Violence 16(8):784–806.Google Scholar
  3. Abbey, A., Ross, L. T., McDuffie., D., and McAuslan, P. (1996). Alcohol and dating risk factors for sexual assault among college women. Psychol. Women Q. 20: 147–169.Google Scholar
  4. Allen, J. P., Litten, J. B. F., and Babor, T. (1997). A review of research on alcohol use disorders identification test (AUDIT). Alcoholism: Clin. Exp. Res. 21(4): 613–619.Google Scholar
  5. Bachman, R. (2000). Violence against women: A national crime victimization survey report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department. of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics, NCJ 145325.Google Scholar
  6. Barbaree, H. E., and Marshall, W. L. (1991). The role of male sexual arousal in rape: Six models. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 59(5): 21–630.Google Scholar
  7. Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 42(2): 155–162.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bem, S. L. (1981). The BSRI and gender schema theory: A reply to Spence and Helmreich. Psychol. Rev. 38(4), 369–371.Google Scholar
  9. Berkowitz, A. (1992). College men as perpetrators of acquaintance rape and sexual assault: A review of recent research. J. Am. Coll. Health 40: 175–181.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Berkowitz, A. (1994). A model acquaintance rape prevention program for men. In Berkowitz, A. (ed.), Men and Rape: Theory, Research, and Prevention Programs in Higher Education, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA, pp. 35–42.Google Scholar
  11. Berkowitz. A. D. (2002). Fostering men's responsibility for preventing sexual assault. In. Schewe, P. A (ed.), Preventing Intimate Partner Violence: Developmentally Appropriate Interventions Across the Lifespan, American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  12. Bohn, M. J., Babor, T. F., and Kranzler, H. R. (1995). The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): Validation of a screening instrument for use in medical settings. J. Stud. Alcohol 56: 423–432.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Borduin, C. M., Henggeler, S. W., Blaske, D. M., and Stein, R. J. (1990). Multisystemic treatment of adolescent sexual offenders. Int. J. Of-fender Ther. Comp. Criminol. 34(2): 105–113.Google Scholar
  14. Braithwaite, J., and Daly, J. (1994). Masculinities, violence and communitarian control. In Newburn, T., and Stanko, E. A. (eds.), Just Boys Doing Business? Men, Masculinities and Crime, Routledge, New York, pp. 189–213.Google Scholar
  15. Brener, N. D., McMahon, P. M., Warren, C. H., and Douglas, K. A. (1999). Forced sexual intercourse and associated health-risk behaviors among female college students in the United States. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol 67: 252–259.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Burt, M. (1980). Cultural myths and supports for rape. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 38: 217–230.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Burt, M. (1991). Rape myths and acquaintance rape. In Parrot, A., and Bechhofer L. (eds.), Acquaintance Rape: The Hidden Crime, Wiley, New York,. pp. 26–40.Google Scholar
  18. Carr, J. L. and VanDeusen, K. (2002). The relationship between family of origin violence and dating violence in college men. J. Interpers. Violence 17(6): 630–646.Google Scholar
  19. Check, J. V. P., and Malamuth, N. M. (1983). Sex role stereotyping and reactions to depictions of stranger versus acquaintance rape. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 45: 344–356.Google Scholar
  20. Check, J. V. P., Malamuth, N. M., Elias, B., and Barton, S. (1985). On hostile ground. Psychol. Today, 56–61.Google Scholar
  21. Dean, K. E., and Malamuth, N. M. (1997). Characteristics of men who aggress sexually and of men who imagine aggressing: Risk and moderating variables. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 72(2): 449–455.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. DeKeseredy, W., and Schwartz, M. (1998). Women abuse on campus: Results from the Canadian National Survey, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.Google Scholar
  23. Ellis, L. (1993). Rape as a biosocial phenomenon. In Hall, G. C. N., Hirschman, R., Graham, J. R., and Zaragoza, M. S. (eds.), Sexual Aggression: Issues in Etiology, Assessment, and Treatment, Taylor & Francis, Washington, DC, pp. 17–41.Google Scholar
  24. Finkelhor, D. (1979). Sexually Victimized Children, Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
  25. Finkelhor, D. (1984). Child Sexual Abuse: New Theory and Research, Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
  26. Fisher, B. S., Cullen, F. T., and Turner, M. G. (2000). The sexual victimization of college women (Report No. NCJ 182369). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.Google Scholar
  27. Foubert, J. (2000). The Men's Program: How to Successfully Lower Men's likelihood of Raping, 2nd ed., Learning Publications, Holmes Beach, FL.Google Scholar
  28. Frintner, M. P., and Rubinson, L. (1993). Acquaintance rape: The influence of alcohol, fraternity membership, and sports team membership. J. Sex Educ. Ther. 19: 272–284.Google Scholar
  29. Groth, N. A. (1979). Men Who Rape,Plenum, NewYork.Google Scholar
  30. Hall, G. C. N. (1996). Theory-Based Assessment, Treatment, and Prevention of Sexual Aggression, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  31. Hammock, G. S., and Richardson, D. R. (1997). Perceptions of rape: The influence of closeness of relationship, intoxication and sex of participant. Violence Victims 12: 237–246.Google Scholar
  32. Hsu, L. K. G., and Starzynski, J. (1990). Adolescent rapists and adolescent child sexual assaulters. Int. J. Offender Ther. Comp. Criminol 34(1): 23–30.Google Scholar
  33. Kanin, E. J. (1985). Date rapists: Differential sexual socialization and relative deprivation. Arch. Sexual Behav. 14: 219–230.Google Scholar
  34. Katz, J. (1995). Reconstructing masculinity in the locker room: The mentors in violence prevention project. Harvard Educ. Rev. 65(2): 163–174.Google Scholar
  35. Kilmartin, C. T. (2000). Sexual Assault in Context: Teaching Col-lege Men About Gender, Learning Publications, Holmes Beach, FL.Google Scholar
  36. Koss, M. (1988). Hidden rape: Sexual aggression and victimization in a national sample of students in higher education. In Burgess, A. W. (ed.), Rape and Sexual Assault, Garland, New York, pp. 3–25.Google Scholar
  37. Koss, M. P., and Dinero, T. E. (1989). Discriminant analysis of risk factors for sexual victimization among a national sample of college women. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 57: 42–250.Google Scholar
  38. Koss, M. P., and Gaines, J. A. (1993). The prediction of sexual aggression by alcohol use, athletic participation, and fraternity affiliation. J. Interpers. Violence 8: 104–108.Google Scholar
  39. Koss, M. P., and Gidycz, C. A. (1985). Sexual Experiences Survey: Reliability and validity. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 53: 22–423.Google Scholar
  40. Koss, M. P., Gidycz, C. A., and Wisniewski, N. (1987). The scope of rape: Incidence and prevalence of sexual aggression and victimization in a national sample of higher education students. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 55: 64–170.Google Scholar
  41. Koss, M. P., and Leonard, K. (1984). Sexually aggressive men: Empirical findings and theoretical implications. In Malamuth, N. M., and Donnerstein, E. (eds.), Pornography and Sexual Aggression, Academic Press, Orlando, FL, pp. 213–232Google Scholar
  42. Koss, M. P., and Oros, C. J. (1982). The Sexual Experiences Survey: A research instrument investigating sexual aggression and victimization. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 50: 455–457.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Larimer, M. E., Lydum, A. R., Anderson, B. K., and Turner, A. P. (1999). Male and female recipients of unwanted sexual contact in a college student sample: Prevalence rates, alcohol use, and depression symptoms. Sex Roles 40: 295–308.Google Scholar
  44. Lisak, D., Hopper, J., and Song, P. (1996). Factors in the cycle of violence: Gender rigidity and emotional constriction. J. Trauma. Stress 9: 721–743.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Lisak, D., and Roth, S. (1990). Motives and psychodynamics of self-reported, unincarcerated rapists. Am. J. Orthopsychiatr. 60: 268–280.Google Scholar
  46. Malamuth, N. M. (1981). Rape proclivity among males. J. Soc. Issues 37: 38–156.Google Scholar
  47. Malamuth, N. M. (1984). Aggression against women: Cultural and in-dividual causes. In Malamuth, N. M., and Donnerstein, E. I. (eds.), Pornography and Sexual Aggression, Academic Press, Orlando, FL, pp. 19–52.Google Scholar
  48. Malamuth, N. M., and Check, J. V. P. (1983). Sexual arousal to rape depictions: Individual differences. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 92: 55–67.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Malamuth, N. M., Sockloskie, R. J., Koss, M. P., and Tanaka J. S. (1991). Characteristics of aggressors against women: Testing a model using a national sample of college students. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 59: 670–681.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Maletzky, B. M. (2000). Sexual assault. In Van Hasselt V. B., and Hersen, M. (eds.), Aggression and Violence: An Introductory text, Allyn &Bacon, Needham Heights, MA, pp. 152–197.Google Scholar
  51. Maletzky, B. M. (1991). Treating the sexual offender. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  52. Martin, P. Y., and Hummer, R. A. (1989). Fraternities and rape on campus. Gender Soc. 3(4): 457–473.Google Scholar
  53. Marx, B. P., Gross, A. M., and Juergens, J. P. (1997). The effects of alcohol consumption and expectancies in an experimental date rape analogue. J. Psychopathol.Behav. Assess. 14(4): 281–302.Google Scholar
  54. Mehrabian, A., and Epstein, N. (1972). Ameasure of emotional empathy. J. Pers. 40(4): 525–543.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Muehlenhard, C., and Linton, M. (1987). Date rape and sexual aggression in dating situations: Incidence and risk factors. J. Counsel. Psychol. 34: 186–196.Google Scholar
  56. Norris, J., and Cubbins, L. A. (1992). Dating, drinking, and rape. Psy-chol. Women Q. 16: 179–191.Google Scholar
  57. O'Sullivan, C. (1991). Acquaintance gang rape on campus. In Parrot, A., and Bechhofer, L. (eds.), Acquaintance Rape: The Hidden Crime, Wiley, New York, pp. 140–156.Google Scholar
  58. Ouimette, P. C. (1997). Psychopathology and sexual aggression in non-incarcerated men. Violence Victims 12: 389–395.Google Scholar
  59. Ouimette, P. C., and Riggs, D. (1998). Testing a mediational model of sexually aggressive behavior in nonincarcerated perpetrators. Violence Victims 13: 117–130.Google Scholar
  60. Prentky, R., and Knight, R. A. (1991). Identifying critical dimensions for discriminating among rapists. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 59: 43–661.Google Scholar
  61. Presley, C. A., Leichliter, J. S., and Meilman, P. W. (1998). Alcohol and Drugs on American College Campuses: A Report to College Presidents, Core Institute, Southern Illinois University.Google Scholar
  62. Pryor, J. B. (1987). Sexual harassment proclivities in men. Sex Roles 17(5/6): 269–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Quackenbush, R. L. (1989). A comparison of androgynous, masculine sex-typed, and undifferentiated males on dimensions of attitudes toward rape. J. Res. Pers. 23: 318–342.Google Scholar
  64. Rapaport, K., and Burkhart, B. (1984). Personality and attitudinal char-acteristics of sexually coercive college males. J. Abnorm. Psy-chol. 93(2): 216–221.Google Scholar
  65. Resnick, H. S., Kilpatrick, D. G., Dansky, B. S., Saunders, B. E., and Best, C. L. (1993). Prevalence of civilian trauma and PTSD in a representative national sample of women. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 61: 984–991.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Rice, M. E., Chaplin, T. C., Harris, G. T., and Coutts, J. (1994). Empathy for the victim and sexual arousal among rapists and nonrapists. J. Interpers. Violence 9: 435–449.Google Scholar
  67. Richardson, D. R., and Hammock, G. S. (1991). Alcohol and acquain-tance rape. In Parrot, A., and Bechhofer, L. (eds.), Acquaintance Rape: The Hidden Crime, Wiley, New York, pp. 83–95Google Scholar
  68. Rozee, P. D. and Koss, M. P. (2001). Rape: A century of resistance. Psychol. WomenQ.25: 295–311.Google Scholar
  69. Rosenthal, E. H., Heesacker, M., and Neimeyer, G. J. (1995). Changing the rape-supportive attitudes of traditional and nontraditional male and female college students. J. Counsel. Psychol. 42: 171–177.Google Scholar
  70. Russell, D. E. H. (1984). Sexual Exploitation,: Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.Google Scholar
  71. Sanday, P. R. (1981a). Female Power and Male Dominance: On the Origins of Sexual Inequality, Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  72. Sanday, P. R. (1981b). The socio-cultural context of rape: A cross-cultural study. J. Soc. Issues 37(4): 5–27.Google Scholar
  73. Sanday, P. R. (1990). Fraternity Gang Rape: Sex, Brotherhood, and Privilege on Campus, New York University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  74. Sanday, P. R. (1996). A Woman Scorned: Acquaintance Rape on Trial, Doubleday, New York.Google Scholar
  75. Schwartz, M., and DeKeseredy, W. (1997). Sexual Assault on the College Campus: The Role of Male Peer Support, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.Google Scholar
  76. Straus, M. A. (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The Conflict Tactics (CT) Scales. J. Marriage Fam. 41: 85–88.Google Scholar
  77. Tabachnick, B. G., and Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using Multivariate Statistics, 4th ed., Allyn & Bacon, Needham Heights, MA.Google Scholar
  78. Thornhill, R., and Palmer, C. (2000). A Natural History of Rape: Biological Bases of Sexual Coercion, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  79. Tyler, K. A., Hoyt, D. R., and Whitbeck, L. B. (1998). Coercive sexual strategies. Violence Victims 13: 47–61.Google Scholar
  80. Warshaw, R., and Parrot, A. (1991). The contribution of sex-role so-cialization to acquaintance rape. In Parrot, A., and Bechhofer, L. (eds.), Acquaintance Rape: The Hidden Crime, Wiley, New York, pp.73–82.Google Scholar
  81. Zgourides, G., Monto, M., and Harris, R. (1997). Correlates of adolescent male sexual offense: Prior adult sexual contact, sexual attitudes, and use of sexually explicit materials. Int. J. Offender Ther. Comp. Criminol. 41: 272–283.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joetta L. Carr
    • 1
  • Karen M. VanDeusen
    • 2
  1. 1.University Counseling and Testing CenterWestern Michigan UniversityKalamazooMichigan
  2. 2.School of Social WorkWestern Michigan UniversityMichigan

Personalised recommendations