Institutions Rule: The Primacy of Institutions Over Geography and Integration in Economic Development

Abstract

We estimate the respective contributions of institutions, geography, and trade in determining income levels around the world, using recently developed instrumental variables for institutions and trade. Our results indicate that the quality of institutions “trumps” everything else. Once institutions are controlled for, conventional measures of geography have at best weak direct effects on incomes, although they have a strong indirect effect by influencing the quality of institutions. Similarly, once institutions are controlled for, trade is almost always insignificant, and often enters the income equation with the “wrong” (i.e., negative) sign. We relate our results to recent literature, and where differences exist, trace their origins to choices on samples, specification, and instrumentation.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Acemoglu, D., S. Johnson, and J. A. Robinson. (2001). “The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation,” American Economic Review 91, 1369-1401.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Acemoglu, D., S. Johnson, and J. A. Robinson. (2002). “Reversal of Fortune: Geography and Institutions in the Making of the Modern World Income Distribution,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 117, 1231-1294.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Acemoglu, D., S. Johnson, J. Robinson, and Y. Thaicharoen. (2003). “Institutional Causes, Macroeconomic Symptoms: Volatility, Crises and Growth,” Journal of Monetary Economics 50, 49-123.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Alcalá, F., and A. Cicconé. (2004). “Trade and Productivity,” Quarterly Journal of Economics (forthcoming).

  5. Angrist, J. D., and A. B. Krueger. (1991). “Does Compulsory School Attendance Affect Schooling and Earnings?” Quarterly Journal of Economics 106, 979-1014.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Belsey, D. A., E. Kuh, and R. E. Welsch. (1980). Regression Diagnostics. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Diamond, J. (1997). Guns, Germs, and Steel. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dollar, D., and A. Kraay. (2004). “Trade, Growth, and Poverty,” The Economic Journal 114, 22-49.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Easterly, W., and R. Levine. (2003). “Tropics, Germs, and Crops: How Endowments Influence Economic Development,” Journal of Monetary Economics 50, 3-40.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Engerman, S. L., and K. L. Sokoloff. (2004). “Factor Endowments, Institutions, and Differential Paths of Growth Among New World Economies: A View from Economic Historians of the United States,” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. H0066.

  11. Frankel, J., and D. Romer. (1999). “Does Trade Cause Growth?,” American Economic Review 89, 379-399.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gallup, J. L., and J. D. Sachs. (1998). The Economic Burden of Malaria. Center for International Development, Harvard University, mimeo.

  13. Gallup, J. L., J. D. Sachs, and A. D. Mellinger. (1998). “Geography and Economic Development,” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. w6849.

  14. Hall, R., and C. I. Jones. (1999). “Why Do Some Countries Produce So Much More Output per Worker than Others?” Quarterly Journal of Economics 114, 83-116.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kaufmann, D., A. Kraay, and P. Zoido-Lobatón. (2002). “Governance Matters II-Updated Indicators for 2000/01,” World Bank Policy Research Department Working Paper No. 2772, Washington DC.

  16. Kiszewski, A., A. Mellinger, A. Spielman, P. Malaney, S. E. Sachs, and J. Sachs (2003). A Global Index Representing the Stability of Malaria Transmission. Center for International Development, Harvard University, mimeo.

  17. Krueger, A., and A. Berg. (2002). “Trade, Growth, and Poverty,” Paper presented at the 2002 World Bank Annual Conference on Development Economics, Washington DC.

  18. La Porta, R., F. Lopez-de-Silanes, A. Shleifer, and R. W. Vishny. (1998). “The Quality of Government,” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 15, 1113-1155.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Masters, W. A., and M. S. McMillan. (2001). “Climate and Scale in Economic Growth,” Journal of Economic Growth 6, 167-186.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mukand, S., and D. Rodrik. (2002). In Search of the Holy Grail: Policy Convergence, Experimentation, and Economic Performance. Harvard University, mimeo.

  21. North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  22. North, D. C. (1994). “Economic Performance Through Time,” The American Economic Review 84, 359-368.

    Google Scholar 

  23. RodrÍguez, F., and D. Rodrik. (2001). “Trade Policy and Economic Growth: A Skeptic's Guide to the Cross-National Evidence.” In B. Bernanke and K. S. Rogoff (eds), Macroeconomics Annual 2000. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Rodrik, D. (2003). “Institutions, Integration, and Geography: In Search of the Deep Determinants of Economic Growth.” In D. Rodrik (ed.), In Search of Prosperity: Analytic Country Studies on Growth. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sachs, J. D. (2001). “Tropical Underdevelopment,” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. w8119.

  26. Sachs, J. (2003). “Institutions Don't Rule: Direct Effects of Geography on Per Capita Income,” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 9490.

  27. Sachs, J., and A. Warner. (1995). “Economic Reform and the Process of Global Integration,” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 1, 1-118.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Sala-i-Martin, X., and A. Subramanian. (2003). “Addressing the Curse of Natural Resources: An Illustration from Nigeria,” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 9804.

  29. Staiger, D., and J. H. Stock. (1997). “Instrumental Variables Regression with Weak Instruments,” Econometrica 65, 557-586.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Stock, J. H., and M. Yogo. (2002). “Testing for Weak Instruments in Linear IV Regressions.” In D. W. K. Andrews and J. H. Stock (eds), Festschrift in Honor of Thomas Rothenberg. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rodrik, D., Subramanian, A. & Trebbi, F. Institutions Rule: The Primacy of Institutions Over Geography and Integration in Economic Development. Journal of Economic Growth 9, 131–165 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOEG.0000031425.72248.85

Download citation

  • growth
  • institutions
  • openness
  • geography