Skip to main content
Log in

Responses to Odors of Dominant and Subordinate House Mice (Mus domesticus) in Live Traps and Responses to Odors in Live Traps by Dominant and Subordinate Males

  • Published:
Journal of Chemical Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Data from 16 0.1-ha field enclosures containing populations of wild house mice (Mus domesticus) were used to test two sets of questions. Do mice respond differentially to odors from dominant and subordinate males in live traps? Do dominant and subordinate males respond differentially to odors in live traps from other mice? A trap was considered odorized if it had captured a mouse during the previous week, during which there were always two trapping nights. Dominant and subordinate males did not differ with respect to the time they were alive in the enclosures, the frequency of capture, or home range size. Overall, mice were more attracted to the odor of dominant males compared to subordinate males. This difference was due primarily to the attraction of estrous and juvenile females to the traps odorized by dominant males. Dominant males were more likely to be captured in traps odorized by estrous females than in traps odorized by juvenile males or females, nonestrous females, or pregnant/lactating females. Subordinate males were caught more frequently in traps odorized by dominant males than were other dominant males. Conversely, dominant males were captured more frequently in traps odorized by subordinate males than were other subordinate males. Rates of capture of self-odor were higher for subordinate than for dominant males. The results may be explained by a combination of factors related to the social and reproduction systems of house mice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • BOONSTRA, R., and KREBS, C. J. 1976. The effect of odour on trap response in Microtus townsendii. J. Zool. London 180:467–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • BOWERS, J. M., and ALEXANDER, B. K. 1967. Mice: Individual recognition by olfactory cues. Science 158:1208–1210.

    Google Scholar 

  • BRONSON, F. H., and MARSDEN, H. M. 1964. Male-induced synchrony of estrus in deermice. Gen. Endocrinol. 4:634–637.

    Google Scholar 

  • DALY, M., WILSON, M. J., and BEHRENDS, P. 1980. Factors affecting rodents' responses to odours of strangers encountered in the field: Experiments with odour-baited traps. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 6:323–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • D'AMATO, F. R. 1988. Effects of male social status on reproductive success and on behavior in mice (Mus musculus). J. Comp. Psychol. 102:146–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • DESJARDINS, C., MARUNIAK, J. A., and BRONSON, F. H. 1973. Social rank in the house mouse: Differentiation revealed by ultraviolet visualization of urinary marking patterns. Science 182:939–941.

    Google Scholar 

  • DOTY, R. L. 1972. Odor preferences of female Peromyscus maniculatus bairdi for male mouse odors of P. m. bairdi and P. leucopus noveboracensis as a function of the estrous cycle. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 81:191–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • DRICKAMER, L. C. 1984. Captures of two species of Peromyscus at live traps baited with male and female odors. J. Mammal. 65:699–702.

    Google Scholar 

  • DRICKAMER, L. C. 1986. Puberty-influencing chemosignals in mice: Ecological and evolutionary considerations, pp. 441–455, in D. Duvall, D. Müller-Schwarze, and R. M. Silverstein (eds.). Chemical Signals in Vertebrates IV. Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • DRICKAMER, L. C. 1989a. Odor preferences of wild stock female house mice (Mus domesticus) tested at three ages using urine and other cues from conspecific males and females. J. Chem. Ecol. 15:1971–1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • DRICKAMER, L. C. 1989b. Patterns of deposition of urine containing chemosignals that affect puberty and reproduction by wild stock male and female house mice (Mus domesticus). J. Chem. Ecol. 15:1407–1421.

    Google Scholar 

  • DRICKAMER, L. C. 1992. Oestrous female house mice discriminate dominant from subordinate males and sons of dominant from sons of subordinate males by odour cues. Anim. Behav. 43:868–870.

    Google Scholar 

  • DRICKAMER, L. C. 1995. Odors in traps: does most recent occupant influence capture rates for house mice? J. Chem. Ecol. 21:541–555.

    Google Scholar 

  • DRICKAMER, L. C., and MIKESIC, D. G. 1990. Urinary chemosignals, reproduction, and population size for house mice (Mus domesticus) living in field enclosures. J. Chem. Ecol. 16:2955–2968.

    Google Scholar 

  • DRICKAMER, L. C., MIKESIC, D. G., and SHAFFER, K. S. 1992. Use of odor baits in traps to test reactions to intra-and interspecific chemical cues in house mice living in outdoor enclosures. J. Chem. Ecol. 18:2223–2250.

    Google Scholar 

  • FERGUSON, B., FUENTES, S. M., SAWREY, D. K., and DEWSBURY, D. A. 1986. Male preferences for unmated versus mated females in two species of voles (Microtus ochrogaster and M. montanus). J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 100:243–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • FERKIN, M. H., and JOHNSTON, R. E. 1995. Meadow voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus) use multiple sources of scent for sex recognition. Anim. Behav. 39:37–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • GALEF, B. G., JR., and CLARK, M. M. 1971. Social factors in the poison avoidance and feeding behavior of wild and domesticated rat pups. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 75:341–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • GALEF, B. G., JR., and STEIN, M. 1985. Demonstrator influence on observer diet preference: Analyses of critical social interactions and olfactory signals. Anim. Learn. Behav. 13:31–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • GURNELL, J., and LITTLE, J. 1992. The influence of trap residual odour on catching woodland rodents. Anim. Behav. 43:623–632.

    Google Scholar 

  • HESKE, E. J. 1987. Responses of a population of California voles, Microtus californicus, to odor-baited traps. J. Mammal. 68:64–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • HURST, J. L. 1987. The functions of urine marking in a free-living population of house mice, Mus domesticus Rutty. Anim. Behav. 35:1433–1442.

    Google Scholar 

  • HURST, J. L. 1990a. The network of olfactory communication operating in populations of wild house mice, pp. 401–414, in D. W. McDonald, D. Müller-Schwarze, and S. Natynczuk (eds.). Chemical Signals in Vertebrates V. Oxford University Press, Oxford, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • HURST, J. L. 1990b. Urine marking in populations of wild house mice Mus domesticus Rutty. I. Communication between males. Anim. Behav. 40:209–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • HURST, J. L. 1990c. Urine marking in populations of wild house mice Mus domesticus Rutty. II. Communication between females. Anim. Behav. 40:223–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • HURST, J. L. 1990d. Urine marking in population of wild house mice Mus domesticus Rutty. III. Communication between the sexes. Anim. Behav. 40:233–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • KIMELMAN, B. R., and LUBOW, R. E. 1974. The inhibitory effect of pre-exposed olfactory cues on intermale aggression in mice. Physiol. Behav. 12:919–922.

    Google Scholar 

  • KING, J. A. 1983. Seasonal dispersal in a semi-natural population of Peromyscus maniculatus. Can. J. Zool. 61:2740–2750.

    Google Scholar 

  • LENINCTON, S. 1983. Social preferences for partners carrying “good genes” in wild house mice. Anim. Behav. 31:325–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • LENINGTON, S. 1988. Analysis of a genetic recognition system in wild house mice. Behav. Genet. 18:549–564.

    Google Scholar 

  • LENINGTON, S. 1991. The t-complex: A story of genes, behavior, and populations. Adv. Stud. Behav. 20:51–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • MAZDZER, E., CAPONE, M. R., and DRICKAMER, L. C. 1976. Conspecific odors and trappability of deermice (Peromyscus leucopus noveboracensis). J. Mammal. 57:607–609.

    Google Scholar 

  • MIKESIC, D. G., and DRICKAMER, L. C. 1992. Factors affecting home range size in house mice (Mus musculus domesticus) living in outdoor enclosures. Am. Midl. Nat. 127:31–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • MOHR, O. O. 1947. Table of equivalent populations of North American small mammals. Am. Midl. Nat. 37:223–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • MONTGOMERY, W. I. 1987. The application of capture-mark-recapture methods to the enumeration of small mammal populations. Symp. Zool. Soc. London 58:25–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • MOSSMAN, C. A., and DRICKAMER, L. C. 1996. Odor preferences of female house mice (Mus domesticus) in seminatural enclosures. J. Comp. Psychol. 110:131–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • OAKESHOTT, J. G. 1974. Social dominance, aggressiveness and mating success among male house mice (Mus musculus). Oecologia 15:143–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • ROWE, F. P., and REDFERN, R. 1969. Aggressive behaviour in related and unrelated wild house mice (Mus musculus L.) Ann. appl. Biol. 64:425–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • STODDART, D. M. 1982. Does trap odor influence estimation of population size of the short-tailed vole, Microtus agrestis. J. Anim. Ecol. 51:375–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • VANDENBERGH, J. G. 1969. Male odor accelerates female sexual maturation in mice. Endocrinology 84:658–660.

    Google Scholar 

  • VANDENBERGH, J. G. 1983. Pheromonal regulation of puberty. In J. G. Vandenbergh (ed.). Pheromones and Mammalian Reproduction. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • VANDENBERGH, J. G., and COPPOLA, D. M. 1986. The physiology and ecology of puberty modulation by primer pheromones. Adv. Stud. Behav. 16:71–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • WOLFF, J. O., and JOHNSON, M. F. 1979. Scent marking in taiga voles. J. Mammal. 60:400–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • ZAR, J. H. 1996. Biostatistical Analysis, 3rd ed. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Drickamer, L.C. Responses to Odors of Dominant and Subordinate House Mice (Mus domesticus) in Live Traps and Responses to Odors in Live Traps by Dominant and Subordinate Males. J Chem Ecol 23, 2493–2506 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOEC.0000006662.93635.25

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOEC.0000006662.93635.25

Navigation