Skip to main content
Log in

Odor Preferences of Weanling and Mature Male and Female Pine Voles

  • Published:
Journal of Chemical Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Olfactory cues from conspecifics have strong influences on behavior. Both female and male juveniles are attracted to familiar odors while adults show preferences for odors of opposite-sex conspecifics. Females show an increased preference for male odors as they mature, but no study has examined whether change with age is seen in males. In this experiment, responses of weanling and mature male and female pine voles (Microtus pinetorum) to familiar odor cues from their family versus those of an unfamiliar, opposite-sex conspecific were examined. Voles were tested in a three-chambered cage with end chambers containing the stimuli. There was a significant difference in odor preference between weanling and mature females. Weanling females preferred odor cues from their families, and mature females preferred the odors of unfamiliar mature males. The pattern was similar in males but the effect was not as strong. The results support the hypothesis that responses to odor cues change with age in pine voles. At least for females, the change in response to odor cues may be involved in the timing of reproduction and thus dispersal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • BENNETT, N. C. 1994. Reproductive suppression in social Cryptomys damarensis colonies—a lifetime of socially-induced sterility in males and females (Rodentia: Bathyergidae). J. Zool. London 234:25–39

    Google Scholar 

  • BRONSON, F. H. 1976. Urine marking in mice: Causes and effects, pp. 119–141, in R. L. Doty (ed.). Mammalian Olfaction, Reproductive Processes and Behavior. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • BROWN, R. E. 1979. Mammalian social odors: A critical review. Adv. Study Behav. 10:103–162

    Google Scholar 

  • BROWN, R. E., and MACDONALD, D. W. (eds.). 1985. Social Odors in Mammals, Vols. 1 and 2. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • COPPOLA, D. M., and O'CONNELL, R. J. 1988. Behavioral responses of peripubertal female mice towards puberty-accelerating and puberty-delaying chemical signals. Chem. Senses 13:407–424

    Google Scholar 

  • CREEL, S. R., and WASER, P. M. 1990. Failures of reproductive suppression in dwarf mongooses (Helogale parvula): Accident or adaptation? Behav. Ecol. 2:7–15

    Google Scholar 

  • CREEL, S. R., and WASER, P. M. 1997. Variation in reproductive suppression among dwarf mongooses: Interplay between mechanisms and evolution. in N. G. Solomon and J. A. French (eds.). Cooperative Breeding in Mammals. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • DRICKAMER, L. C. 1989a. Odor preferences of wild stock female house mice (Mus domesticus) tested at three ages using urine and other cues from conspecific males and females. J. Chem. Ecol. 15:1971–1987

    Google Scholar 

  • DRICKAMER, L. C. 1989b. Patterns of deposition of urine containing chemosignals that affect puberty and reproduction by wild stock male and female house mice (Mus domesticus). J. Chem. Ecol. 15:1407–1421

    Google Scholar 

  • DRICKAMER, L. C. 1992a. Oestrous female house mice discriminate dominant from subordinate males and sons of dominant from sons of subordinate males by odour cues. Anim. Behav. 43:868–870

    Google Scholar 

  • DRICKAMER, L. C. 1992b. Behavioral selection of odor cues by young female mice affects age of puberty. Dev. Psychobiol. 25:461–470

    Google Scholar 

  • FERKIN, M. H. 1989. Adult-weanling recognition among captive meadow voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus). Behaviour 108:114–124

    Google Scholar 

  • FERKIN, M. H., and RUTKA, T. F. 1990. Mechanisms of sibling recognition in meadow voles. Can. J. Zool. 68:609–613

    Google Scholar 

  • FERKIN, M. H., and JOHNSTON, R. E. 1995. Meadow voles, Microtus pennsylvanicus, use multiple sources of scent for sex recognition. Anim. Behav. 49:37–44

    Google Scholar 

  • FERKIN, M. H., FERKIN, F. H., and RICHMOND, M. 1994. Sources of scent used by prairie voles. Microtus ochrogaster, to convey sexual identity to conspecifics. Can.J. Zool. 72:2205–2209

    Google Scholar 

  • HALPIN, Z. T. 1986. Individual odors among mammals: Origins and functions. Adv. Study Behav. 16:39–70

    Google Scholar 

  • HOLEKAMP, K. E. 1986. Proximal causes of natal dispersal in Belding's ground squirrels (Spermophilus beldingi). Ecol. Monogr. 56:365–391

    Google Scholar 

  • HOWELL, D. C. 1982. Statistical Methods in Psychology. Duxbury Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • HURST, J. L. 1987. The functions of urine marking in a free-living population of house mice, Mus domesticus. Anim. Behav. 35:1433–1442

    Google Scholar 

  • HURST, J. L. 1989. The complex network of olfactory communication in populations of wild house mice Mus musculus Rutty: Urine marking and investigation within family groups. Anim. Behav. 37:705–725

    Google Scholar 

  • HURST, J. L. 1990. Urine marking in populations of wild house mice Mus domesticus Rutty III. Communication between the sexes. Anim. Behav. 40:233–243

    Google Scholar 

  • HURST, J. L., and NEVISON, C. M. 1994. Do female house mice, Mus domesticus, regulate their exposure to reproductive priming pheromones? Anim. Behav. 48:945–959

    Google Scholar 

  • JOHNSTON, R. E. 1980. Responses of male hamsters to odors of females in different reproductive states. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 5:894–904

    Google Scholar 

  • KERR, L. 1994. Family influences on sexual maturation in male pine voles. Undergraduate honors thesis. Miami University, Oxford, Ohio

  • LEPRI, J. J., and VANDENBERGH, J. G. 1986. Puberty in pine voles, Microtus pinetorum, and the influence of chemosignals on female reproduction. Biol. Reprod 34:370–377

    Google Scholar 

  • MYKYTOWYCZ, R. 1974. Odor in the spacing behavior of mammals, pp. 327–343, in M. C. Birch (ed.), Pheromones. North-Holland Publishing, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • RICHMOND, M., and CONWAY, C. H. 1969. Induced ovulation and oestrus in Microtus ochrogaster J. Reprod. Fertil. 6(Suppl.):357–376

    Google Scholar 

  • RICHMOND, M., and STEHN, R. 1976. Olfaction and reproductive behaviour in microtine rodents, pp. 197–219, in R. L. Doty (ed.). Mammalian Olfaction, Reproductive Processes, and Behavior. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • SCHADLER, M. H., and BUTTERSTEIN, G. M. 1979. Reproduction in the pine vole, Microtus pinetorum. J. Mammal. 60:841–844

    Google Scholar 

  • SOLOMON, N. G. 1993. Body size and social preferences of male and female prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster). Anim. Behav. 45:1031–1033

    Google Scholar 

  • SOLOMON, N. G., and VANDENBERGH, J. G. 1994. Management, breeding, and reproductive performance of pine voles. Lab. Anim. Sci. 44:613–617

    Google Scholar 

  • SOLOMON, N. G., VANDENBERGH, J. G., WEKESA, K. S., and BARGHUSEN, L. 1996. Chemical cues are necessary but insufficient for reproductive activation of female pine voles (Microtus pinetorum). Biol. Reprod. 54:1038–1045

    Google Scholar 

  • TARDIF, S. D. 1984. Social influences on sexual maturation of female Saguinus oedipus oedipus. Am. J. Primatol. 6:199–209

    Google Scholar 

  • ZIEGLER, T. E., SAVAGE, A., SCHEFFLER, G., and SNOWDON, C. T. 1987. The endocrinology of puberty and reproductive functioning in female cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus) under varying social conditions. Biol. Reprod. 37:618–627

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Solomon, N.G., Rumbaugh, T. Odor Preferences of Weanling and Mature Male and Female Pine Voles. J Chem Ecol 23, 2133–2143 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOEC.0000006434.97821.fa

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOEC.0000006434.97821.fa

Navigation