Skip to main content
Log in

Predator Responses to Sequestered Plant Toxins in Buckeye Caterpillars: Are Tritrophic Interactions Locally Variable?

  • Published:
Journal of Chemical Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent studies demonstrate that generalist insect herbivores may be more subject to predation than specialists and suggest that this pattern is related to the availability and utilization of plant-derived natural products in diets of the latter. This intuitively attractive hypothesis has seldom been tested under natural conditions, however. A well-described plant-insect system, the buckeye butterfly, Junonia coenia, and its iridoid glycoside-containing host plants, was used to test the hypotheses: (1) that larval sequestration of iridoids reduces predation in the field, and (2) that this protection varies among populations. Fifth-instars reared in the laboratory on leaves of two host-plant species, Kickxia elatine (Scrophulariaceae) or Plantago lanceolata (Plantaginaceae), or on artificial diets were attached to monofilament tethers and set out into four natural populations. Only larvae fed on the locally available host plant and artificial diet-fed caterpillars were used at each site. Despite high overall predation, significantly more leaf-fed caterpillars survived than did artificial diet-fed caterpillars in Plantago sites, but the trend was not significant in Kickxia sites. The results reflect the differences in iridoid glycoside availability in these two host-plant species. They indicate that predators exert a strong selective force on this insect, that sequestered iridoid glycosides can be effective deterrents to predation, and that host-plant choices by ovipositing females and feeding larvae have consequences for mortality from natural enemies. This protection, however, is not absolute, and depends on local predator abundance and/or selectivity. The ecological interactions between buckeye caterpillars, their host plants, and their natural enemies are locally variable in nature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • ADLER, L. S., SCHMITT, J. A., and BOWERS, M. D. 1994. Genetic variation in defensive chemistry in Plantago lanceolata (Plantaginaceae) and its effect on the specialist herbivore Junonia coenia (Nymphalidae). Oecologia 101:75–85

    Google Scholar 

  • BELOFSKY, G., BOWERS, M. D., JANZEN, S., and STERMITZ, F. R. 1989. Iridoid glycosides of Aureolaria flava and their sequestration by Euphydryas phaeton butterflies. Phytochemistry 28:1601–1604

    Google Scholar 

  • BERNAYS, E., and GRAHAM, M. 1988. On the evolution of host specificity in phytophagous arthropods. Ecology 69:886–892

    Google Scholar 

  • BERNAYS, E. A. 1988. Host specificity in phytophagous insects: Selection pressure from generalist predators. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 49:131–140

    Google Scholar 

  • BERNAYS, E. A., and CORNELIUS, M. L. 1989. Generalist caterpillar prey are more palatable than specialists for the generalist predator Iridomyrmex humilis. Oecologia 79:427–430

    Google Scholar 

  • BLUM, M. S. 1981. The Chemical Defenses of Arthropods. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • BOWERS, M. D. 1980. Unpalability as a defensive strategy of Euphydryas phaeton (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Evolution 34:586–600

    Google Scholar 

  • BOWERS, M. D. 1981. Unpalatability as a defense strategy of western checkerspot butterflies (Euphydryas). Evolution 35:367–375

    Google Scholar 

  • BOWERS, M. D. 1984. Iridoid glycosides and host-plant specificity in larvae of the buckeye butterfly, Junonia coenia (Nymphalidae). J. Chem. Ecol. 10:1567–1577

    Google Scholar 

  • BOWERS, M. D. 1990. Recycling plant natural products for insect defense, pp. 353–386, in D. L. Evans and J. O. Schmidt (eds.). Insect Defenses: Adaptive Mechanisms and Strategies of Prey And Predators SUNY Press, Stony Brook, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • BOWERS, M. D. 1991. Iridoid glycosides, pp. 297–325, in G. A. Rosenthal and M. R. Berenbaum (eds.). Herbivores: Their Interactions with Secondary Plant Metabolites, Vol I, The Chemical Participants, 2nd ed. Academic Press, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • BOWERS, M. D. 1993. Aposematic caterpillars: life-styles of the warningly colored and unpalatable, pp. 331–371, in N. E. Stamp and T. M. Casey (eds.). Caterpillars: Ecological and Evolutionary Constraints on Foraging. Chapman and Hall, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • BOWERS, M. D., and COLLINGE, S. K. 1992. Fate of iridoid glycosides in different life stages of the buckeye, Junonia coenia, (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). J. Chem. Ecol. 18:817–831

    Google Scholar 

  • BOWERS, M. D., and FARLEY, S. 1990. The behavior of grey jays, Perisoreus canadensis, towards palatable and unpalatable Lepidoptera. Anim. Behav. 39:699–705

    Google Scholar 

  • BOWERS, M. D., and LARIN, Z. 1989. Acquired chemical defense in the lycaenid butterfly, Eumaeus atala. J. Chem. Ecol. 15:1133–1146

    Google Scholar 

  • BOWERS, M. D., and PUTTICK, G. M. 1986. The fate of ingested iridoid glycosides in lepidopteran herbivores. J. Chem. Ecol. 12:169–178

    Google Scholar 

  • BOWERS, M. D., STAMP, N. E., and COLLINGE, S. K. 1992. Early stage of host range expansion in a specialist herbivore. Ecology 73:526–536

    Google Scholar 

  • BROWER, J. V. Z. 1958a. Experimental studies of mimicry in some North American butterflies. Part 1. The monarch Danaus plexippus, and the viceroy, Limenitis archippus archippus. Evolution 12:32–47

    Google Scholar 

  • BROWER, J. V. Z. 1958b. Experimental studies of mimicry in some North American butterflies. Part II. Battus philenor and Papilio troilus, P. polyxenes, and P. glaucus. Evolution 12:123–136

    Google Scholar 

  • BROWER, J. V. Z. 1958c. Experimental studies of mimicry in some North American butterflies. Part III. Danaus gilippus berenice and Limenitis archippus floridensis. Evolution 12:273–285

    Google Scholar 

  • BROWER, L. P., and BROWER, J. V. Z. 1964. Birds, butterflies and plant poisons: A study in ecological chemistry. Zoologica 49:137–159

    Google Scholar 

  • CAMARA, M. D. 1997. A recent host range expansion in Junonia coenia Hübner (Nymphalidae): Oviposition preference, survival, growth, and chemical defense. Evolution 51:873–884

    Google Scholar 

  • COPPINGER, R. P. 1969. The effect of experience and novelty on avian feeding behaviour with reference to the evolution of warning coloration in butterflies. I. Reactions of wild caught adult blue jays to novel insects. Behaviour 35:45–60

    Google Scholar 

  • COPPINGER, R. P. 1970. The effects of experience and novelty on avian feeding behavior with reference to the evolution of warning coloration in butterflies. II. Reactions of naive birds to novel insects. Am. Nat. 104:323–334

    Google Scholar 

  • DE LA FUENTE, M., DYER, L. A., and BOWERS, M. D. 1994/1995. The iridoid glycoside, eatalpol, as a deterrent to the predator Camponotus floridanus (Formicidae). Chemoecology 5/6:13–18

    Google Scholar 

  • DEMPSTER, J. P. 1983. The natural control of populations of butterflies and moths. Biol. Rev. 58:461–481

    Google Scholar 

  • DENNO, R. F., LARSSON, S., and OLMSTEAD, K. L. 1990. Role of enemy-free space and plant quality in host-plant selection by willow beetles. Ecology 71:124–137

    Google Scholar 

  • DUFFEY, S. S. 1980. Sequestration of plant natural products by insects. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 25:447–477

    Google Scholar 

  • DUNCAN, C. J., and SHEPPARD, P. M. 1965. Sensory discrimination and its role in the evolution of batesian mimicry. Behaviour 24:269–282

    Google Scholar 

  • DYER, L. A. 1994. Lepidopteran larval defenses against predators in tropical and temperate systems: The importance of diet breadth and chemistry. PhD dissertation. University of Colorado, Boulder

  • DYER, L. A., and FLOYD, T. 1993. Determinants of predation in phytophagous insects: The importance of diet breadth. Oecologia 96:575–582

    Google Scholar 

  • GARDNER, D. R. and STERMITZ, F. R. 1988. Hostplant utilization and iridoid glycoside sequestration by Euphydryas anicia individuals and populations. J. Chem. Ecol. 14:2147–2168

    Google Scholar 

  • GITTLEMAN, J. L. P., HARVEY, P. H., and GREENWOOD, P. J. 1980. The evolution of conspicuous coloration: some experiments in bad taste. Anim. Behav. 28:897–899

    Google Scholar 

  • JARVI, T., SILLEN TULLBERG, B., and WIKLUND, C. 1981. The cost of being aposematic. An experimental study of predation on larvae of Papilio machon by the great tit, Parus major. Oikos 36:267–272

    Google Scholar 

  • KEIPER, R. 1969. Causal factors of stereotypies in caged birds. Anim. Behav. 17:114–119

    Google Scholar 

  • LEA, R. G., and TURNER, J. R. G. 1972. Experiments on mimicry: II. The effect of a Batesian mimic on its model. Behaviour 42:131–151

    Google Scholar 

  • MONTLLOR, C. B., and BERNAYS, E. A. 1993. Invertebrate predators and caterpillar foraging. pp. 170–202, in N. E. Stamp and T. M. Casey (eds.). Caterpillars: Ecological and Evolutionary Constraints on Foraging. Chapman and Hall, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • MORRELL, G. M., and TURNER, J. R. G. 1970. Experiments on mimicry: I. The response of wild birds to artificial prey. Behaviour 36:116–131

    Google Scholar 

  • MORRIS, R. F. 1972. Predation by wasps, birds, and mammals on Hyphantria cunea. Can. Entomol. 104:1581–1591

    Google Scholar 

  • PEREYRA, P. C., and BOWERS, M. D. 1988. Iridoid glycosides as oviposition stimulants for the buckeye butterfly, Junonia coenia (Nymphalidae). J. Chem. Ecol. 14:917–928

    Google Scholar 

  • SARGENT, T. D. 1967. Stereotypies in caged birds. Anim. Behav. 15:62–66

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute. 1987. SAS/STAT Guide for Personal Computers, Version 6 Edition. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina.

    Google Scholar 

  • STAMP, N. E. 1992. Susceptibility of specialist versus generalist caterpillars to invertebrate predators. Oecologia 92:124–129

    Google Scholar 

  • STAMP, N. E., and BOWERS, M. D. 1992. Behaviour of specialist and generalist caterpillars on plantain (plantago lanceolata). Ecol. Entomol. 17:273–279

    Google Scholar 

  • STEWARD, V. B., SMITH, K. G., and STEPHEN, F. M. 1988. Predation by wasps on lepidopteran larvae in an Ozark forest canopy. Ecol. Entomol. 13:81–86

    Google Scholar 

  • THOMPSON, J. N. 1994. The Coevolutionary Process. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Camara, M.D. Predator Responses to Sequestered Plant Toxins in Buckeye Caterpillars: Are Tritrophic Interactions Locally Variable?. J Chem Ecol 23, 2093–2106 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOEC.0000006431.34359.c2

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOEC.0000006431.34359.c2

Navigation