Skip to main content
Log in

(Z)6, (E)8-Heneicosadien-11-One: Synergistic Sex Pheromone Component of Douglas-Fir Tussock Moth, Orgyia pseudotsugata (McDunnough) (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae)

  • Published:
Journal of Chemical Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Three candidate sex pheromone components, (Z)6,(Z)9-, (Z)6,(E)8-, and (Z)6,(E)9-heneicosadien-11-one (Z6Z9, Z6E8, and Z6E9) were identified in pheromone gland extracts of female Douglas-fir tussock moths (DFTM), Orgyia pseudotsugata (McDunnough). Their occurrence in subnanogram quantities in extracts and structural conversion during analytical procedures and bioassays complicated chemical identifications. Complete identification required comparative analyses of stereoselectively synthesized and female-produced dienones by coupled gas chromatographic–electroantennographic detection (GC-EAD), high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and coupled GC–mass spectrometry (MS). Determination of the pheromone component was contingent upon an experimental design that minimized structural rearrangement of dienones before and during the field test. In a 40-min field experiment, acetonitrile solutions of each of the above dienones were carried on Dry Ice to traps and were syringed onto cotton release devices below trap lids. In combination with the previously known sex pheromone component of DFTM, (Z)6-heneicosen-11-one (Z6), Z6E8 was the only synergistic dienone and the mixture was highly attractive. Because Z6 by itself attracts seven species of tussock moths (two sympatric with DFTM), a blend of Z6 and Z6E8 may impart specificity to DFTM pheromone communication. In commercial lures, this binary blend may facilitate species-specific, sensitive monitoring and efficacious control by mating disruption of this important forest defoliator.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • ARN, H., STÄDLER, E., and RAUSCHER, S. 1975. The electroantennographic detector-A selective and sensitive tool in the gas chromatographic analysis of insect pheromones. Z. Naturforsch. 30c:722–725.

    Google Scholar 

  • ARN, H., TÓTH, M., and PRIESNER E. 1992. List of sex pheromones of Lepidoptera and related attractants, 2nd ed. International Organization for Biological Control, Monfavet.

    Google Scholar 

  • BUSER, H. R., GUERIN, P. M., TÓTH, M., SZÖCS, G., SCHMID, A., FRANCKE, W., and ARN, H. 1995. Nonadecadien-3-one and (Z,Z,Z)-3,6,9-nonadecatriene: Identification and synthesis of sex pheromone components of Peribatodes rhomboidaria. Tetrahedron Lett. 26:403–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • CHANG, Y.-H., UANG, B.-J., WU, C.-M., and YU, T.-H. 1990. A simple and inexpensive synthesis of 2-alkenals. Synthesis 1033–1034.

  • DATERMAN, G. E. 1978. Monitoring and early detection, pp. 99–102, in M. H. Brooks, R. W. Stark, and R. W. Campbell (eds.). The Douglas-Fir Tussock Moth: a Synthesis. U.S. Forest Serv. Tech. Bull. 1585

  • DATERMAN, G. E. 1980. Pheromone responses of forest Lepidoptera; Implications for dispersal and pest management, pp. 251–265, in A. A. Berryman and L. Safranyik (eds.). Dispersal of forest insects: evaluation, theory and management implications. Proceedings of second IUFRO conference.

  • DATERMAN, G. E. 1982. Monitoring insects with pheromones: trapping objectives and bait formulations, pp. 195–212, in A. F. Kydonieus and M. Beroza (eds.). Insect suppression with controlled release pheromone systems. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • DATERMAN, G. E., PETERSON, C. J., ROBBINS, R. G., SOWER, L. L., DAVES, G. D., JR., and SMITH, R. G. 1976. Laboratory and field bioassay of the Douglas-fir tussock moth pheromone, (Z)-6-heneicosen-11-one. Environ. Entomol. 5:1187–1190.

    Google Scholar 

  • DATERMAN, G. E., LIVINGSTON, R. L., WENZ, J. M., and SOWER, L. L. 1979. How to use pheromone traps to determine outbreak potentials, Douglas-Fir Tussock Moth Handbook. U.S. Dept. Agr.

  • GRANT, G. G. 1977. Interspecific pheromone responses of tussock moths and some isolating mechanisms of eastern species. Environ. Entomol. 6:739–742.

    Google Scholar 

  • GRANT, G. G., FRECH, G., and GRISDALE, D. 1975. Tussock moths: Cross stimulation, calling behaviour, and effect of hybridization. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 68:519–524.

    Google Scholar 

  • GRAY, T. G., SLESSOR, K. N., SHEPHERD, R. F., GRANT, G. G., and MANVILLE, J. F. 1984. European pine shoot moth, Rhyacionia buoliana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae): Identification of additional pheromone components resulting in an improved lure. Can. Entomol. 116:1525–1532.

    Google Scholar 

  • HULME, M., and GRAY, T. G. 1994. Mating disruption of Douglas-fir tussock moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) using a sprayable formulation of Z-6-heneicosen-11-one. Envion. Entomol. 23:1097–1100.

    Google Scholar 

  • MASON, R. R., and WICKMAN, B. E. 1988. The Douglas-fir tussock moth in the interior pacific Northwest, pp. 179–209, in A. A. Berryman (ed.). Dynamics of Forest Insect Populations. Plenum, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • MATSUDA, M., MURAKAMI, K., MIZUNO, K., HOSHIKAWA, K., OKAMOTO, T., and MIAKE, N. 1989. Study of hydroxy alkenes by carbon-13 NMR, Kiyo-Suzuka Kogyo Koto Senmon Gakko 22:103–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • RACHLIN, A. I., WASYLIW, N., and GOLDBERG, M. W. 1961. A synthesis of arachidonic acid. J. Org. Chem. 26:2688–2693.

    Google Scholar 

  • RICARD, R., SAUVAGE, P., WAN, C. S. K., WEEDON, A. C., and WONG, D. F. 1986. Photochemical enolization of acyclic β-alkyl-α,β-unsaturated ketones. J. Org. Chem. 51:62–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS/STAT. 1988. User's Guide, Release 6.03 Edition. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • SHEPHERD, R. F., and OTVOS, I. S. 1986. Pest Management of Douglas-fir tussock moth: Procedures for insect monitoring, problem evaluation and control actions. Can. For. Serv. Pac. For. Centre, BC-X-270.

  • SMITH, L. M., SMITH R. G., LOEHR T. M., DAVES, G. D., JR., DATERMAN, G. E., and WOHLEB, R. H. 1978. Douglas-fir tussock moth pheromone: Identification of a diene analogue of the principal attractant and synthesis of stereochemically defined 1,6-, 2,6-, and 3,6-heneicosadien-11-ones. J. Org. Chem. 43:2361–2366.

    Google Scholar 

  • SMTIH, R. G., DATERMAN, G. E., and DAVES, G. D., JR., 1975. Douglas-fir tussock moth: Sex pheromone identification and synthesis. Science 188:63–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • SOWER, L. L., WENZ, J. M., DAHLSTEN, D. L., and DATERMAN, G. E. 1990. Field testing of pheromone disruption on preoutbreak populations of Douglas-fir tussock moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 83:1487–1491.

    Google Scholar 

  • STILL, W. C., KAHN, M., and MITRA, A. 1978. Rapid chromatographic technique for preparative separation with moderate resolution. J. Org. Chem. 43:2923–2925.

    Google Scholar 

  • VERKRUIJSSE, H. D., and HASSELAAR, M. 1979. An improved synthesis of 1,4-diynes. Synth. Commun. 4:292–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • WICKMAN, B. E. 1978. Tree injury, pp. 66–75, in M. H. Brookes, R. W. Stark, and R. W. Campbell (eds.). The Douglas-Fir Tussock Moth: A Synthesis, U.S. Forest Serv. Tech. Bull. 1585.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gries, G., Slessor, K.N., Gries, R. et al. (Z)6, (E)8-Heneicosadien-11-One: Synergistic Sex Pheromone Component of Douglas-Fir Tussock Moth, Orgyia pseudotsugata (McDunnough) (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae). J Chem Ecol 23, 19–34 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOEC.0000006343.38471.c7

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOEC.0000006343.38471.c7

Navigation