Skip to main content
Log in

Hydrophilicity of 3-D biomaterials: The Washburn equation

  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Characterisation and quantification of the surface energy of biomaterials used as tissue engineering scaffolds is important, but many of the techniques available to examine these properties are only applicable to smooth flat samples, not porous materials. This paper describes the application of the Washburn equation to measure the surface energy of a range of porous polyether polyurethane scaffolds with three test liquids; n-Hexane was used to measure a material constant, whilst ethanol and xylene were used to measure contact angles. The results show that the Washburn equation is not applicable in its current form, reasons for this could be that the voids in the materials are too wide for effective capillarity; absorption of the solvents into the polymer matrix may further complicate the measured imbibition profile. Another possible reason is the differences between the sizes of the interconnecting pores in scaffolds with varying void sizes; this could affect the capillary effect of the test liquids through the material. The repeatability of the results and the similar patterns observed with the different liquids suggest that if these issues could be quantified and incorporated into the Washburn equation, it may be possible to generate useful results for similar materials.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. D. Andrade, in “Surface and Interfacial Aspects of Biomedical Polymers, Vol. 1: Surface Chemistry and Physics” (Plenum Publishers, New York, 1985) p. 272

    Google Scholar 

  2. F. Rupp, D. Axmann, C. Ziegler and J. Geisgerstorfer, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 62 (2002) 4.

    Google Scholar 

  3. S. Agathopoulos and P. Nikolopoulos, ibid. 29 (1995) 4.

    Google Scholar 

  4. E. W. Washburn, Phys. Rev. 17 (1921) 3.

    Google Scholar 

  5. E. Chibowski and L. Holysz, J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 11 (1997) 10.

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. Hamraoui and T. Nylander, J. Colloid Interfac. Sci. 250 (2002) 60.

    Google Scholar 

  7. L. Zhaohui and R. F. Giese, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 77 (1994) 8.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. Troger, K. Lunkwitz, K. Grundke and W. Burger, Colloids Surf. A: Physcochem. Eng. Aspects 134 (1998) 299.

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. Schoelkopf, P. A. C. Gane, C. J. Ridgeway and G. P. Matthews, ibid. 206 (2002) 445.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Y. W. Yang, G. Zografi and E. E. Miller, J. Colloid Interfac. Sci. 122 (1988) 24.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Y. W. Yang, G. Zografi and E. E. Miller, ibid. 122 (1988) 35.

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. Siebold, A. Walliser, M. Nardin, M. Oppliger and J. Schultz, ibid. 186 (1997) 60.

    Google Scholar 

  13. “CDCA-100 Manual” (Camtel Ltd, Royston, UK, 1999) Appendix 2.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. V. Jackson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jackson, P.V., Hunt, J.A., Doherty, P.J. et al. Hydrophilicity of 3-D biomaterials: The Washburn equation. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine 15, 507–511 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JMSM.0000021129.60818.ca

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JMSM.0000021129.60818.ca

Keywords

Navigation