Skip to main content
Log in

Investigating cell–material interactions by monitoring and analysing cell migration

  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cell–material interactions can on one hand be characterised by assessing the functional state and or shape of the cells at one or different discrete periods of time, on the other hand by observing cell migration and spreading behaviour. The object of this study was to investigate the migration behaviour of fluorescently labelled cells, and to evaluate the software analysing this migration. In the present study, the behaviour of fibroblasts cells on differently structured surfaces was taken as example. In the first step, the influence of seven different lipophilic dyes (DiI, DiO, DiA, DiD, DiR, PKH2 and PKH26) on cell performance was determined taking biochemical parameters as indices. In the second step, the fluorescence characteristics of these dyes were compared regarding their applicability. In the third step, migration behaviour of DiI-labelled fibroblastic cells on plane and grooved surfaces were monitored and analysed using specific software. Our data suggest that most of the dyes have optimal characteristics for studying cell – cell interactions. Cell migration behaviour regarding migration direction and cell spreading was different on plane and grooved surfaces. It could be shown that computer-based image analysis represents a practical, quick and objective tool to quantify exactly cell migration behaviour.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. D. A. Lauffenburger and A. Horwitz, Cell 84 (1996) 359.

    Google Scholar 

  2. K. Webb, V. Hlady and P. A. Tresco, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 49 (2000) 362.

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. Curtis and C. Wilkinson, Biochem. Soc. Symp. 65 (1999) 15.

    Google Scholar 

  4. E. A. Cox, D. Bennin, A. T. Doan, T. O'Toole and A. Huttenlocher, Mol. Biol. Cell 14 (2003) 658.

    Google Scholar 

  5. B. Wojciak-Stothard, A. S. G. Curtis, W. Monaghan, M. McGrath, I. Sommer and C. D. W. Wilkinson, Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton 31 (1995) 147.

    Google Scholar 

  6. B. Chehroudi, T. R. Gould and D. M. Brunette, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 23 (1989) 1067.

    Google Scholar 

  7. C. M. Lo, H. B. Wang, M. Dembo and Y. L. Wang, Biophys. J. 79 (2000) 144.

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. Curtis, C. Wilkinson and B. Wojciak-Stothard, Cell Eng. Inc. Mol. Eng. 1 (1995) 35.

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. G. Honig and R. I. Hume, J. Cell Biol. 103 (1986) 171.

    Google Scholar 

  10. P. K. Horan, M. J. Melnicoff, B. D. Jensen and S. E. Slezak, Meth. Cell Biol. 33 (1990) 469.

    Google Scholar 

  11. A. Bruinink, in “The Brain in Bits and Pieces” (M. T. C. Verlag, Zollikon, CH) p. 23.

  12. D. M. Brunette, Exp. Cell Res. 167 (1986) 203.

    Google Scholar 

  13. E. T. Den Braber, J. E. De Ruijter, L. A. Ginsel, A. F. Recum and J. A. Jansen, Biomaterials 17 (1996) 2037.

    Google Scholar 

  14. A. Curtis and P. Clark, Crit. Rev. Biocomp. 5 (1990) 343.

    Google Scholar 

  15. S. Li, S. Bhatia, Y. L. Hu, Y. T. Shiu, Y. S. Li, S. Usami and S. Chien, Biorheology 8 (2001) 101.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Bruinink.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kaiser, JP., Bruinink, A. Investigating cell–material interactions by monitoring and analysing cell migration. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine 15, 429–435 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JMSM.0000021115.55254.a8

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JMSM.0000021115.55254.a8

Keywords

Navigation