Abstract
Surgical implants often show different types of localized corrosion such as corrosion fatigue cracking, pitting and crevice corrosion on the same part. Interactions of these different corrosion phenomena were investigated. This was done by cyclic loading of electropolished tensile specimens at different constant and changing potentials. Material investigated was a surgical implant steel X2CrNiMo18-15-3 which was immersed in physiological NaCl solution. Pitting and repassivation potentials were determined. Samples with and without artificial cracks as well as masked specimens were tested. Incubation period for first damage, density and size of pits by coulometric and volumetric method were determined. The fracture surfaces were then investigated by SEM. Results show that not in all cases pitting corrosion was the cause for corrosion fatigue cracking. Also pitting is favoured by crack formation. Density of pits increases by a factor of 5 without any change to pitting potential. There are primary pits formed prior to crack initiation and secondary pits formed after crack initiation. At samples without crack there is almost no difference between the optically measured value of total pit volume and the coulometrically determined value. At samples with cracks coulometric volume of pits is much larger than optical one. This proves that there is a significant amount of crevice corrosion in the crack. The corrosion current density in the crack increases by two orders of magnitude when comparing it to electropolished surface of the sample. Results of laboratory experiments are confirmed by failure of a real implant.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
H. Zitter, Mater. Corr. 22 (1971) 598.
H. Zitter and D. Schaschl-Outschar, ibid. 32 (1981) 324.
H. Zitter, ibid. 42 (1991) 455.
T. K. Christman, Corrosion 46 (1990) 450.
S. R. Novak, in “Proceedings of Corrosion Fatigue: Mechanics Metallurgy, Electrochemistry and Engineering, St. Louis, 1981” (ASTM, Philadelphia, 1983) p. 26.
C. Patel, V. Rollins and T. Pyle, Nature 266 (1977) 517.
R. Ebra and Y. Yamada, in “Proceeding of Corrosion Fatigue: Mechanics Metallurgy, Electrochemistry and Engineering, St. Louis, 1981” (ASTM, Philadelphia, 1983) p. 135.
H. Speckhardt, in “Proceeding of Corrosion Fatigue” (NACE, Houston, Texas, 1972) p. 557.
S. J. Lennon, F. P. A. Robinson and G. G. Garrett, Corrosion 40 (1984) 409.
S. Suresh, in “Proceedings of Fatigue of Materials” (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1991) p. 120.
J. Q. Wang, J. Li, Z. F. Wang, Z. Y. Zhu, W. Ke, Z. G. Wang and Q. S. Zang, Script. Metall. Mater. 31 (1994) 1561.
K. Komai and K. Minoshima, Trans. Jap. Inst. Met. 27 (1986) 23.
H. Wiegand, H. Speckhardt and H. Spähn, Stahl Eisen 88 (1968) 726.
M. Nakajima and K. Tokaji, Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct. 18 (1995) 345.
X. Y. Zhou, D. L. Chen, W. Ke, Q. S. Zang and Z. G. Wang, Mater. Lett. 7 (1989) 473.
J. Wang and J. Li, Scr. Metall. Mater. 29 (1993) 1415.
D. Chastell and P. Doig, Corr. Sci. 19 (1979) 335.
J. I. Dickson and L. Shiqiong, Mater. Charact. 28 (1992) 327.
F. W. Hirth, O. Michel and H. Speckhardt, Werkst. Korr. 23 (1972) 356.
H. Wieser, PhD thesis, University of Leoben, Austria (1997).
H. Zitter, G. Mori, G. Hochörtler and H. Wieser, Mater. Corr. 53 (2002) 37.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mori, G., Dösinger, H. Interactions of different types of localized corrosion in surgical implants. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine 15, 249–254 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JMSM.0000015484.79006.06
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JMSM.0000015484.79006.06