Abstract
In thermal characterization tests of polymethylmethacrylate bone cement performed according to the ASTM Standard Specification for Acrylic Bone Cement, time–temperature profiles of bone cement were observed to be sensitive to the thickness of the cement patty and the mold material. Due to the heat transfer from cement to the surrounding mold, such tests might underestimate the exothermic temperature of bone cement. Developing test methods to better characterize cement thermal behavior is necessary for accurate cement curing simulations. In this paper, the effects of the mold material and geometry on experimental measurements of bone cement setting temperature and setting time were evaluated by conducting the polymerization in different test molds. Finite element (FE) numerical simulations were also performed to provide a further understanding of these effects. It was found that the mold material and geometry significantly influence the values of the parameters measured using the ASTM standard. Results showed that the setting temperature measured was about 50 °C lower in a polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) mold than in a polyurethane (PU) foam mold for the 6 mm thickness cement. The measured peak temperature using PTFE molds varied about 75 °C for different mold heights (6 mm vs. 40 mm), but only by 28 °C with PU molds. The measured setting time with PTFE molds varied by about 740 s for different mold heights (6 mm vs. 40 mm), while only by about 130 s for PU molds. Using PU foam materials for the test mold decreases cement heat transfer effects due to the poor heat conductivity of PU foam and provides more consistent measured results. FE parametric studies also support these observations. Poor conductivity materials, like PU foam, make better molds for the characterization of bone cement thermal behavior.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
J. Charnley, J. Bone Joint Surg. (Br) 42 (1960) 28.
J. Charnley, Clin. Orthop. Rel. Res. 111 (1975) 105.
K. Kuhn, in “Bone Cements: Up-to-Date Comparison of Physical and Chemical Properties of Commercial Materials” (Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2000) pp. 21-34.
R. Huiskes, Acta Orthopaedica Scand. (Suppl. 185) (1980) 43.
I. Revie, M. Wallace and J. Orr, Proc. Instn. Mech. Engrs. 208 (1994) 45.
C. G. Nelson, E. C. Krishnan and J. R. Neff, Med. Phys. 13 (1986) 482.
ASTM Standard, ASTM F451: Standard Specification for Acrylic Bone Cement, in “Annual Book of ASTM Standards”, vol. 13.01, (West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM, 2000) pp. 55-61.
C. Li, S. Kotha, C. Huang, S. Schmid, D. Yakimicki, M. Hawkins and J. Mason, Finite element simulation of thermal behavior of prosthesis-cement—3-bone system, ASME Bioengineering Conference 2001 BED —3-vol. 50, pp. 235-236.
C. Li, S. Kotha, C. Huang, S. Schmid, D. Yakimicki, M. Hawkins and J. Mason, J. Biomech. Eng. 125 (2003) 315.
A. Borzacchiello, L. Ambrosio, L. Nicolais, E. Harper, E. Tanner and W. Bonfield, J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Med. 9 (1998) 317.
A. Maffezzoli, D. Ronca, G. Guida, I. Pochini and L. Nicolais, ibid. 8 (1997) 75.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Li, C., Mason, J. & Yakimicki, D. Thermal characterization of PMMA-based bone cement curing. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine 15, 85–89 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JMSM.0000010101.45352.d1
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JMSM.0000010101.45352.d1