Abstract
The thermal conductivity, thermal expansion, Young's Modulus, flexural strength, and brittle-plastic deformation transition temperature were determined for HfB2, HfC0.98, HfC0.67, and HfN0.92 ceramics. The mechanical behavior of αHf(N) solid solutions was also studied. The thermal conductivity of modified HfB2 exceeded that of the other materials by a factor of 5 at room temperature and by a factor of 2.5 at 820°C. The transition temperature of HfC exhibited a strong stoichiometry dependence, decreasing from 2200°C for HfC0.98 to 1100°C for HfC0.67 ceramics. The transition temperature of HfB2 was 1100°C. Pure HfB2 was found to have a strength of 340 MPa in 4 point bending, that was constant from room temperature to 1600°C, while a HfB2 + 10% HfC x had a higher room temperature bend strength of 440 MPa, but that dropped to 200 MPa at 1600°C. The data generated by this effort was inputted into finite element models to predict material response in internally heated nozzle tests. The theoretical model required accurate material properties, realistic thermal boundary conditions, transient heat transfer analysis, and a good understanding of the displacement constraints. The results of the modeling suggest that HfB2 should survive the high thermal stresses generated during the nozzle test primarily because of its superior thermal conductivity. The comparison the theoretical failure calculations to the observed response in actual test conditions show quite good agreement implying that the behavior of the design is well understood.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
H. OKAMOTO, Bull. Alloy Phase Diagr. 11(2) (1990) 146.
B. JOHANSSON, J. SUNDGREN and U. HELMERSON, J. Appl. Phys. 58(8) (1985) 3112.
O. RUANO and G. ELSSNER, J. Less Comm. Met. 52 (1977), 153.
E. RUDY and S. WINDISCH, Tech Rep. AFML-TR-65-2 (1966) p. 1.
O. KUBASCHEWSKI-VON GOLDBECK, “Phase Diagrams” (International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, 1981).
J. R. FENTER, SAMPE Quarterly 2(3) (1971) 1.
L. KAUFMAN and E. V. CLOUGHERTY, AFML-RTD-TDR-63-4096 (1963).
D. F. WILEY, W. R. MANNING and O. HUNTER, J. Less Comm. Met. 18 (1969) 149.
E. RUDY, AFML-TR-65-2 (1969).
J. B. BERKOWITZ-MATTUCK J. Electrochem. Soc. 113(9) (1968) 908.
W. C. TRIPP and H. C. GRAHAM, J. Electrochem. Soc. (Solid State Sc.) 118(7) (1971) 1195.
H. C. GRAHAM et al., in Proceedings of the Sixth University Conference on Ceramic Science, North Carolina State University at Raleigh Dec. 7/9, 1970, Materials Science Research, Vol. 5 (Plenum Press, New York, 1971) p. 35.
E. V. CLOUGHERTY, AFML-TR-68-190 (1968).
W. C. TRIPP, H. H. DAVIS and H. C. GRAHAM, Ceram. Bull. 52(8) (1973) 612.
D. J. RASKY, J. D. BULL and H. K. TRAN, in the 15th Conference on Metal Matrix, Carbon, and Ceramic Composites (1991) p. 153.
I. G. TALMY, E. J. WUCHINA and J. A. ZAYKOSKI, “Ceramic Matrix Composites” (Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, PA, 1994).
J. L. ROUTBORT, Acta Metall. 30 (1982) 663.
A. J. PERRY, Powder Metall. Intern. 19(1) (1987) 29.
J. P. HIRTH and J. LOTHE, “Theory of Dislocations” (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1968).
H. CARSLAW and J. JAEGER, “Conduction of Heat in Solids” (Oxford University Press, London, 1959) p. 112.
S. TIMOSHENKO, “Strength of Materials, Part II, Advanced Theory and Problems” (Kreiger, Huntington, NY, 1976).
H. SHAPIRO, “The Dynamics and Thermodynamics of Compressible Gas Flow” (Ronald Press, New York, 1953) p. 88.
D. BARTZ, Jet Propulsion 27 (1957) 49.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wuchina, E., Opeka, M., Causey, S. et al. Designing for ultrahigh-temperature applications: The mechanical and thermal properties of HfB2, HfC x , HfN x and αHf(N). Journal of Materials Science 39, 5939–5949 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JMSC.0000041690.06117.34
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JMSC.0000041690.06117.34