Skip to main content
Log in

A comparative assessment of creep property predictions for a 1CrMoV rotor steel using the CRISPEN, CDM, Omega and Theta projection techniques

  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper assesses the relative accuracy of a number of techniques that are capable of predicting a wide range of creep properties. The techniques studied in this paper include the 4-Θ, 6-θ, CRISPEN, Omega and CDM methodologies. The parameters of these models were estimated from short-term creep property data on 1CrMoV steel and these estimated models were then used to predict the known longer-term creep properties of this steel. It was found that the CDM approach yielded predicted times to failure that were wholly inadequate. The 6-θ approach was best for predicting long term times to failure. The best minimum creep rate predictions came from using either the 4-Θ, or the CRISPEN or the Omega technique. Finally, times to small strains were best predicted using the 6-θ and CRISPEN techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R. W. Evans, Mater. Sci. Techn. 5 (1989) 699.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Idem., ibid. 16 (2000) 6.

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. W. Evans and P. J. Scharning, ibid. 17 (2001) 487.

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. Evans, J. Mater. Sci. 35 (2000) 2937.

    Google Scholar 

  5. L. M. Kachanov, “The Theory of Creep” (National Lending Library, Boston Spa, UK, 1967).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Y. N. Rabotnow, “Creep Problems in Structural Members” (North Holland, Amsterdam, 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  7. A. M. Othman and D. R. Hayhurst, Int. J. Mech. Sci. 32(1) (1990) 35.

    Google Scholar 

  8. M. Prager, J. Press. Vess. Techn. 122 (2000) 273.

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. E. Keeble, “Investigation into the Accuracy and Applicability of the MPC Omega Method of Creep Life Prediction in Relation to Other Lifing Methods,” Thesis (M.Phil.), University of Wales Swansea, 1996.

  10. J. C. Ion, A. Barbosa, M. F. Ashby, B. F. Dyson and M. Mclean, “The Modelling of Creep for Engineering Design,” I. NPL report DMA A115, 1986.

  11. F. R. Larson and J. Miller, Trans. ASME 174(5) (1952) 765.

    Google Scholar 

  12. R. W. Evans, M. R. Willis, B. Wilshire, S. Holdsworth, B. Senior, A. Fleming, M. Spindler and J. A. Williams, in Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on “Creep and Fracture of Materials and Structures,” Swansea, 1993, edited by B. Wilshire and R. W. Evans (The Institute of Materials, London, 1993) p. 633.

    Google Scholar 

  13. R. W. Evans and B. Wilshire, “Creep of Metals and Alloys” (The Institute of Materials, London, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  14. D. Wang and R. W. Evans, in “Uniaxial Creep Modelling by Continuum Damage Mechanics, CRISPEN and the Theta Projection Concept,” in “COMPASS” 1999, edited by W. J. Evans, R. W. Evans and M. Bache (Engineering Advisory Services Ltd., London, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  15. R. W. Evans, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 456 (2000) 835.

    Google Scholar 

  16. M. Evans, J. Strain Anal. 37 (2002) 169.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Evans, M. A comparative assessment of creep property predictions for a 1CrMoV rotor steel using the CRISPEN, CDM, Omega and Theta projection techniques. Journal of Materials Science 39, 2053–2071 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JMSC.0000017768.59276.3f

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JMSC.0000017768.59276.3f

Keywords

Navigation