Abstract
This paper examines the consequences of introducing mobile number portability (MNP). We show that if the sole effect of introducing MNP is the abolishment of switching costs, MNP unambiguously benefits mobile customers. However, if MNP also causes consumer ignorance, as telephone numbers no longer identify networks, mobile operators will increase termination charges, with ambiguous net effect on the surplus of mobile customers. We examine how extensions such as MNP based on call-forwarding, termination fee regulation, and alternative means of carrier identification affect these findings and discuss policy implications.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
References
Aoki, R. and Small, J., “The economics of number portability: switching costs and two-part tariffs,” Working paper, University of Auckland, November 1999.
Armstrong, M., “Network interconnection in telecommunications,” Econ. J., vol. 108, pp. 545–564, 1998.
European Commission, Eighth Report from the Commission on the Implementation of the Telecommunications Regulatory Package, COM(2002) 695, Brussels, December 2002.
Gans, J.S. and King, S.P., “Mobile network competition, customer ignorance and fixed-to-mobile call prices,” Inform. Econ. Policy, vol. 12, pp. 301–327, 2000.
Gans, J.S., King, S.P., and Woodbridge, G., “Numbers to the people: Regulation, ownership, and local number portability,” Inform. Econ. Policy, vol. 13, pp. 167–180, 2001.
Haucap, J., “Telephone number allocation: a property rights approach,” Euro. J. Law Econ., vol. 15, pp. 91–109, 2003.
INTUG, “Mobile number portability,” International Telecommunications User Group (INTUG), [www. intug.net/mnp], 2003.
Laffont, J.J., Rey, P., and Tirole, J., “Network competition I: Overview and nondiscriminatory pricing,” RAND J. Econ., vol. 29, pp. 1–37, 1998.
Laffont, J.J., and Tirole, J., Competition in Telecommunications. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, 2000.
NERA/Smith, “Feasibility Study and Cost Benefit Analysis of Number Portability for Mobile Services in Hong Kong, Final Report to OFTA,” NERA/Smith: London, May 1998.
Oftel, “Economic evaluation of number portability in the U.K. mobile telephony market,” Oftel: London, July 1997.
Ovum, “Mobile Numbering and Number Portability in Ireland,” A Report to the ODTR, Ovum: London, October 2000.
Reinke, T.H., “Local number portability and local loop competition,” Telecommunications Policy, vol. 22 no. 1, pp. 73–87, 1998.
Schwarz-Schilling, C. and Stumpf, U., “NetzbetreiberportabilitaÈt im Mobilfunkmarkt: Auswirkungen auf Wettbewerb und Verbraucherinteressen,” Discussion Paper No. 199, WIK: Bad Honnef, December 1999.
Wright, J., “Access pricing under competition: an application to cellular networks,” J. Ind. Econ., vol. 50, pp. 289–315, 2002.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Buehler, S., Haucap, J. Mobile Number Portability. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade 4, 223–238 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JICT.0000047299.13443.5a
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JICT.0000047299.13443.5a
- number portability
- switching costs
- telecommunications
- network competition