Abstract
This article examines cohabitation in Israel. Since the 1980s cohabitation has been on the rise, with heterosexual couples living together without being legally married. The purpose of this article is to address the following questions: What are the characteristics of cohabitation; what economic circumstances affect cohabitation; why is cohabitation chosen over “family” and is it becoming a threat to the family institution? The sample consisted of 50 couples. Our major findings were that cohabitation does not seem to be an alternative to marriage, but a prelude to it. We found a high correlation between the cohabitants' willingness to marry and their willingness to have children in the future. Cohabitants live in rented apartments, usually do not share a bank account, and have no formal economic agreement.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ben-David, A., & Lavee, Y. (1994). Migration and marital distress: The case of Soviet immigrants. Journal of Divorce and Remarriage, 21(3/4), 133-145.
Berg, B. (1988). Marriage without a certificate. Future, 24-27.
Brines, J., & Joyner, K. (1999). The ties that bind: principles of cohesion in cohabitation and marriage. American Sociological Review, 64, 333-355.
Bumpass, L. L., & Lu, H. H. (2000). Trends in cohabitation and implications for children's family contexts in the United States. Population Studies, 54, 29-41.
Buunk, R. W., & Driel, V. B. (1989). Variant lifestyles and relationships. Newburg Park, London, New Delhi: Sage.
Central Bureau of Statistics. (1999). Statistical abstract of Israel. Jerusalem: Central Bureau of Statistics.
Central Bureau of Statistics. (2001). Statistical abstract of Israel. Jerusalem: Central Bureau of Statistics.
Cohan, C. L., & Kleinbaum, S. (2002). Toward a greater understanding of the cohabitation effect: Premarital cohabitation and marital communication. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 64(1), 180-192.
DellaPergula, S. (1993). Demographic changes in the state of Israel in the early nineties. In Y. Koff (Ed.), Allocation of resources to social services 1992–1993 (pp. 63-108). Jerusalem: Center for the Study of Social Policy in Israel.
Duvander, A. E. (1999). The transition from cohabitation to marriage. Journal of Family Issues, 20(5), 698-717.
Ekert, J. O., & Solaz, A. (2001). Unemployment, marriage and cohabitation in France. Journal of Socio-Economics, 30(1), 75-98.
Elizabeth, V. (2000). Cohabitation, marriage, and the unruly consequences of difference. Gender & Society, 4(1), 87-110.
Eriksen, J., & Lindsay, J. (1999). Unmarried cohabitation and family policy. Comparative Social Research, 18, 79-103.
Falah, S. (2000). The Druze in the Middle East. Jerusalem: Ministry of Defence.
Horwitz, V. A., & White, R. H. (1998). The relationship of cohabitation and mental health: A study of a young adult cohort. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 505-514.
Katz, R. (2001). Effects of migration, ethnicity, and religiosity on cohabitation. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 32(4), 587-600.
Katz, R., & Peres, Y. (1986). The sociology of the family in Israel: An outline of its development from the 1950's to the 1980's. European Sociological Review, 2(2), 148-159.
Kiernan, K. (2000). European perspectives on union formation. In L. J. Waite (Ed.), The ties that bind. Perspectives on marriage and cohabitation (pp. 40-58). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
Krauss, V. (1977). Social scale of professions in Israel. Jerusalem, Israel: Hebrew University.
Macklin, D. E. (1974). Students who live together: Trail marriage or going very steady. Psychology Today, 11, 53-59.
Manning, W. D., & Landale, N. S. (1996). Racial and ethnic differences in the role of cohabitation in premarital childbearing. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58, 63-77.
Murphy, M. (2000). The evolution of cohabitation in Britain, 1960–95. Population Studies, 54, 43-56.
Oropesa, R. S. (1996). Normative beliefs about marriage and cohabitation: A comparison of non-Latino Whites, Mexican American, and Puerto Ricans. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58, 49-62.
Peres Y. (1998). Cohabitation: A contemporary alternative to marriage? International Sociological Association (ISA), asp Association Paper.
Peres, Y., and Katz, R. (1991). The family in Israel: Change and continuity. In L. Shamgar-Handelman & R. Bar-Yosef (Eds.), Families in Israel (pp. 9-32). Jerusalem: Academon.
Raley, R. K. (2000). Recent trends and differentials in marriage and cohabitation: The United States. In L. J. Waite (Ed.), The ties that bind. Perspectives on marriage and cohabitation (pp. 19-39). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
Seltzer, J. A. (2000). Families formed outside of marriage. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62(4), 1247-1268.
Shachar, R. (1991). His and her marital satisfaction: The double standard. Sex Roles, 25(7/8), 451-467.
Singh, S., & Lindsay, J. (1996). Money in heterosexual relationships. ANZJS, 32(3), 57-69.
Smock, J. P. (2000). Cohabitation in the United States: An appraisal of research themes, findings, and implications. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 1-20.
Stack, S., & Eshleman, R. J. (1998). Marital status and happiness: A 17-nation study. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 527-536.
Steir, H., Oren, A., & Lewin-Epstein, N. (1998). Gender roles, family, and women's participation in the labor force: Attitudes of veteran Israeli and newcomers in a comparative perspective. Tel-Aviv: The Institute for Social Research.
Treas, J., & Giesen, D. (2000). Sexual infidelity among married and cohabiting Americans. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 48-60.
Trost, J. (1980). The Family in Change. Vasteras: International Library.
Wiersma, E. G. (1983). Cohabitation an alternative to marriage: A cross national study. The Hague: Nijhoff.
Wu, Z., & Pollard, M. S. (2000). Economic circumstances and the stability of nonmarital cohabitation. Journal of Family Issues, 21(3), 303-328.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Baloush-Kleinman, V., Sharlin, S.A. Social, Economic, and Attitudinal Characteristics of Cohabitation in Israel. Journal of Family and Economic Issues 25, 255–269 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JEEI.0000023641.81143.43
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JEEI.0000023641.81143.43