Skip to main content
Log in

Social, Economic, and Attitudinal Characteristics of Cohabitation in Israel

  • Published:
Journal of Family and Economic Issues Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article examines cohabitation in Israel. Since the 1980s cohabitation has been on the rise, with heterosexual couples living together without being legally married. The purpose of this article is to address the following questions: What are the characteristics of cohabitation; what economic circumstances affect cohabitation; why is cohabitation chosen over “family” and is it becoming a threat to the family institution? The sample consisted of 50 couples. Our major findings were that cohabitation does not seem to be an alternative to marriage, but a prelude to it. We found a high correlation between the cohabitants' willingness to marry and their willingness to have children in the future. Cohabitants live in rented apartments, usually do not share a bank account, and have no formal economic agreement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ben-David, A., & Lavee, Y. (1994). Migration and marital distress: The case of Soviet immigrants. Journal of Divorce and Remarriage, 21(3/4), 133-145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, B. (1988). Marriage without a certificate. Future, 24-27.

  • Brines, J., & Joyner, K. (1999). The ties that bind: principles of cohesion in cohabitation and marriage. American Sociological Review, 64, 333-355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bumpass, L. L., & Lu, H. H. (2000). Trends in cohabitation and implications for children's family contexts in the United States. Population Studies, 54, 29-41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buunk, R. W., & Driel, V. B. (1989). Variant lifestyles and relationships. Newburg Park, London, New Delhi: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Central Bureau of Statistics. (1999). Statistical abstract of Israel. Jerusalem: Central Bureau of Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Central Bureau of Statistics. (2001). Statistical abstract of Israel. Jerusalem: Central Bureau of Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohan, C. L., & Kleinbaum, S. (2002). Toward a greater understanding of the cohabitation effect: Premarital cohabitation and marital communication. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 64(1), 180-192.

    Google Scholar 

  • DellaPergula, S. (1993). Demographic changes in the state of Israel in the early nineties. In Y. Koff (Ed.), Allocation of resources to social services 1992–1993 (pp. 63-108). Jerusalem: Center for the Study of Social Policy in Israel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duvander, A. E. (1999). The transition from cohabitation to marriage. Journal of Family Issues, 20(5), 698-717.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekert, J. O., & Solaz, A. (2001). Unemployment, marriage and cohabitation in France. Journal of Socio-Economics, 30(1), 75-98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elizabeth, V. (2000). Cohabitation, marriage, and the unruly consequences of difference. Gender & Society, 4(1), 87-110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eriksen, J., & Lindsay, J. (1999). Unmarried cohabitation and family policy. Comparative Social Research, 18, 79-103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falah, S. (2000). The Druze in the Middle East. Jerusalem: Ministry of Defence.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horwitz, V. A., & White, R. H. (1998). The relationship of cohabitation and mental health: A study of a young adult cohort. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 505-514.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, R. (2001). Effects of migration, ethnicity, and religiosity on cohabitation. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 32(4), 587-600.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, R., & Peres, Y. (1986). The sociology of the family in Israel: An outline of its development from the 1950's to the 1980's. European Sociological Review, 2(2), 148-159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiernan, K. (2000). European perspectives on union formation. In L. J. Waite (Ed.), The ties that bind. Perspectives on marriage and cohabitation (pp. 40-58). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krauss, V. (1977). Social scale of professions in Israel. Jerusalem, Israel: Hebrew University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macklin, D. E. (1974). Students who live together: Trail marriage or going very steady. Psychology Today, 11, 53-59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning, W. D., & Landale, N. S. (1996). Racial and ethnic differences in the role of cohabitation in premarital childbearing. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58, 63-77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, M. (2000). The evolution of cohabitation in Britain, 1960–95. Population Studies, 54, 43-56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oropesa, R. S. (1996). Normative beliefs about marriage and cohabitation: A comparison of non-Latino Whites, Mexican American, and Puerto Ricans. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58, 49-62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peres Y. (1998). Cohabitation: A contemporary alternative to marriage? International Sociological Association (ISA), asp Association Paper.

  • Peres, Y., and Katz, R. (1991). The family in Israel: Change and continuity. In L. Shamgar-Handelman & R. Bar-Yosef (Eds.), Families in Israel (pp. 9-32). Jerusalem: Academon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raley, R. K. (2000). Recent trends and differentials in marriage and cohabitation: The United States. In L. J. Waite (Ed.), The ties that bind. Perspectives on marriage and cohabitation (pp. 19-39). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seltzer, J. A. (2000). Families formed outside of marriage. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62(4), 1247-1268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shachar, R. (1991). His and her marital satisfaction: The double standard. Sex Roles, 25(7/8), 451-467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, S., & Lindsay, J. (1996). Money in heterosexual relationships. ANZJS, 32(3), 57-69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smock, J. P. (2000). Cohabitation in the United States: An appraisal of research themes, findings, and implications. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 1-20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stack, S., & Eshleman, R. J. (1998). Marital status and happiness: A 17-nation study. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 527-536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steir, H., Oren, A., & Lewin-Epstein, N. (1998). Gender roles, family, and women's participation in the labor force: Attitudes of veteran Israeli and newcomers in a comparative perspective. Tel-Aviv: The Institute for Social Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treas, J., & Giesen, D. (2000). Sexual infidelity among married and cohabiting Americans. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 48-60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trost, J. (1980). The Family in Change. Vasteras: International Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiersma, E. G. (1983). Cohabitation an alternative to marriage: A cross national study. The Hague: Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, Z., & Pollard, M. S. (2000). Economic circumstances and the stability of nonmarital cohabitation. Journal of Family Issues, 21(3), 303-328.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baloush-Kleinman, V., Sharlin, S.A. Social, Economic, and Attitudinal Characteristics of Cohabitation in Israel. Journal of Family and Economic Issues 25, 255–269 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JEEI.0000023641.81143.43

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JEEI.0000023641.81143.43

Navigation