Skip to main content
Log in

Child Care Use and Parental Desire to Switch Care Type Among a Low-Income Population

  • Published:
Journal of Family and Economic Issues Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigates the use of and satisfaction with child care among low-income families, who are those likely to be affected by recent changes in public policy that emphasize increased work effort. Data from the Survey of Wisconsin Works Families portray differences in the use of center-based care depending on whether or not the family received a child care subsidy. A multivariate analysis of a measure of parental satisfaction, whether a parent would switch child care sources if all care were available at no charge, suggests that parents tend to be more satisfied with center-based care than with alternative forms of care. The analysis also suggests that mothers who received a child care subsidy were significantly more likely to have their children in center-based care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acs, G., & Loprest, P. (2001). Initial synthesis report of the findings from ASPE's 'leavers' grants. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, D. (2000). The production of quality in child care centers: Another look. Applied Developmental Science, 4, 136-148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burkhardt, S., Golden, O., Karolak, E., & Stoney, L. (2002, December). Child care development fund report of state plans FY2002–2003. Paper presented for the Child Care Bureau, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC.

  • Ehrle, J., Adams, G., & Tout, K. (2001, January). Who's caring for our youngest children? Child care patterns of infants and toddlers. (Urban Institute Occasional Paper 42). Washington, DC.

  • Fuller, B., Holloway, S. D., & Liang, L. (1996). Family selection of child-care centers: The influence of household support, ethnicity, and parental practices. Child Development, 67(6), 3320-3337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, B., Kagan, S. L., Caspary, G. L., & Gauthier, C. A. (2002). Welfare reform and child care options for low-income families. Future of Children, 12, 97-119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giannarelli, L., & Barsimantov, J. (2000, December). Child care expenses of America's families. (Urban Institute Occassional Paper 40). Washington, DC.

  • Karoly, L. A., Greenwood, P. W., Everingham, S. S., Houbé, J., Kilburn, M. R., Rydell, P. R., et al. (1998). Investing in our children: What we know and don't know about the costs and benefits of early childhood interventions. Santa Monica, CA: RAND. (Report MR-898).

  • LeRoy, B., & Johnson, D. (2002). Open road or blind alley? Welfare reform, mothers, and children with disabilities. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 23(4), 323-337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, D. R., & Cancian, M. (2001). W-2 Child support demonstration evaluation, phase 1: Final report. Madison, WI: Institute for Research on Poverty, University of Wisconsin–Madison.

    Google Scholar 

  • NICHD Early Child Care Research Network. (2000). The relation of child care to cognitive and language development. Child Development, 71(4), 960-980.

    Google Scholar 

  • NICHD Early Child Care Research Network. (2002). Early child care and children's development prior to school entry: Results from the NICHD study of early child care. American Educational Research Journal, 39(1, Spring), 133-164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, M., Stark, E., & Valdez, B. (1998). Barriers to Medi-Cal enrollment and ideas for improving enrollment: Findings from eight focus groups in California with parents of potentially eligible children. Menlo Park, CA: Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, Number 1436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulman, K., Blank, H., & Ewen, D. (2001). A fragile foundation: State child care assistance policies. Washington, DC: Children's Defense Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Department of Health and Human Services (2004). Introduction to the child care bureau. Retrieved January, 2004. from www.acf.dhhs.gov/programs/ccb/geninfo/index.htm

  • Vandell, D. L., Henderson, V. K., & Wilson, K. S. (1988). A longitudinal study of children with day-care experiences of varying quality. Child Development, 59, 1286-1292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandell, D. L., & Powers, C. (1983). Daycare quality and children's free play activities. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 53, 493-500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandell, D., & Wolfe, B. (2000). Child care quality: Does it matter and does it need to be improved? (Special Report No. 78). Madison, WI: Institute for Research on Poverty, University of Wisconsin–Madison.

  • Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development. (2002). Child care co-payment schedule for licensed and certified care, 2002. Retrieved April, 2003, from www.dwd.state.wi.us/dws/programs/childcare/wishares/pdf/cc2002fpl.pdf

  • Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development. (2003). Statewide child care costs, December 2002. Retrieved April, 2003, from www.dwd.state.wi.us/dws/programs/childcare/wishares/sfscc.htm

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wolfe, B., Scrivner, S. Child Care Use and Parental Desire to Switch Care Type Among a Low-Income Population. Journal of Family and Economic Issues 25, 139–162 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JEEI.0000023635.67750.fd

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JEEI.0000023635.67750.fd

Navigation