Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Model of the Early Development of Thalamo-Cortical Connections and Area Patterning via Signaling Molecules

  • Published:
Journal of Computational Neuroscience Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The mammalian cortex is divided into architectonic and functionally distinct areas. There is growing experimental evidence that their emergence and development is controlled by both epigenetic and genetic factors. The latter were recently implicated as dominating the early cortical area specification. In this paper, we present a theoretical model that explicitly considers the genetic factors and that is able to explain several sets of experiments on cortical area regulation involving transcription factors Emx2 and Pax6, and fibroblast growth factor FGF8. The model consists of the dynamics of thalamo-cortical connections modulated by signaling molecules that are regulated genetically, and by axonal competition for neocortical space. The model can make predictions and provides a basic mathematical framework for the early development of the thalamo-cortical connections and area patterning that can be further refined as more experimental facts become known.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bishop KM, Goudreau G, O'Leary DD (2000) Regulation of area identity in the mammalian neocortex by Emx2 and Pax6. Science 288: 344–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop KM, Rubenstein JLR, O'Leary DD (2002) Distinct actions of Emx1, Emx2 and Pax6 in regulating the specification of areas in the developing neocortex. J. Neurosci. 22: 7627–7638.

    Google Scholar 

  • CohenTannoudji M, Babinet C, Wassef M (1994) Early determination of a mouse somatosensory cortex marker. Nature 368: 460–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldheim DA, et al. (2000) Genetic analysis of ephrinA2 and ephrinA5 shows their requirement in multiple aspects of retinocollicular mapping. Neuron, 25: 563–574.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finlay BL, Darlington RB (1995) Linked regularities in the development and evolution of mammalian brains. Science 268: 1578–1584.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser SE, Hunt RK (1980) Retinotectal specificity: Models and experiments in search of a mapping function. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 3: 319–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • FukuchiShimogori T, Grove EA (2001) Neocortex patterning by the secreted signaling molecule FGF8. Science 294: 1071–1074.

    Google Scholar 

  • FukuchiShimogori T, Grove EA(2003) Emx2 patterns the neocortex by regulating FGF positional signaling. Nature Neurosci. 6: 825–831.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garel S, Huffman KJ, Rubenstein JLR (2003) Molecular regionalization of the neocortex is disrupted in FGF8 hypomorphic mutants. Development 130: 1903–1914.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gierer A (1983) Model for the retinotectal projection. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 218: 77–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodhill GJ, Richards LJ (1999) Retinotectal maps: Molecules, models and misplaced data. Trends Neurosci. 22: 529–534.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grove EA, FukuchiShimogori T (2003) Generating the cerebral cortical area map. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 26: 355–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofman MA (1989) On the evolution and geometry of the brain in mammals. Prog. Neurobiol. 32: 137–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karbowski J (2003) How does connectivity between cortical areas depend on brain size? Implications for efficient computation. J. Comput. Neurosci. 15: 347–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz LC, Shatz CJ (1996) Synaptic activity and the construction of cortical circuits. Science 274: 1133–1138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knoll B, Drescher U (2002) EphrinAs as receptors in topographic projections. Trends Neurosci. 25: 145–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krubitzer L (1995) The organization of neocortex in mammals: Are species differences really so different? Trends Neurosci. 18: 408–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krubitzer L, Huffman KJ (2000) Arealization of the neocortex in mammals: Genetic and epigenetic contributions to the phenotype. Brain Behav. Evol. 55: 322–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • LopezBendito G, Molnar Z (2003) Thalamocortical development: How are we going to get there? Nature Rev. Neurosci. 4: 276–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackarehtschian K, Lau CK, Caras I, McConnel SK (1999) Regional differences in the developing cerebral cortex revealed by Ephrin-A5 expression. Cereb. Cortex 9: 601–610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallamaci A, Muzio L, Chan CH, Parnavelas J, Boncinelli E (2000) mutant mice. Nature Neurosci. 3: 679–686.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann F, Peuckert C, Dehner F, Zhou R, Bolz J (2002) Ephrins regulate the formation of terminal axonal arbors during the development of thalamocortical projections. Development 129: 3945–3955.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin T, Hindges R, O'Leary DDM (2003) Regulation of axonal patterning of the retina and its topographic mapping in the brain. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 13: 57-69

    Google Scholar 

  • MiyashitaLin EM, Hevner R, Wassarman KM, Martinez S, Rubenstein JLR (1999) Early neocortical regionalization in the absence of thalamic innervation. Science 285: 906–909.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray JD (1993) Mathematical Biology.Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 109–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muzio L et al. (2002) Emx2 and Pax6 control regionalization of the preneuronogenic cortical primordium. Cereb. Cortex 12: 129–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakagawa Y, Johnson JE, O'Leary DDM (1999). Graded and areal expression patterns of regulatory genes and cadherins in embryonic neocortex independent of thalamocortical input. J. Neurosci. 19: 10877–10885.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nauta WJH, Feirtag M (1986) Fundamental Neuroanatomy. (Freeman, New York)

  • Northcutt RG, Kaas JH (1995) The emergence and evolution of mammalian neocortex. Trends Neurosci. 18: 373–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Leary DDM (1989) Do cortical areas emerge from a protocortex? Trends Neurosci. 12: 400–406

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Leary DDM, Yates PA, McLaughlin T (1999) Molecular development of sensory maps: Representing sights and smells in the brain. Cell 96: 255–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Leary DDM, Nakagawa Y (2002) Patterning centers, regulatory genes and extrinsic mechanisms controlling arealization of the neocortex. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 12: 14-25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prestige MC, Willshaw DJ (1975) On a role for competition in the formation of patterned neural connexions. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 190: 77-98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rakic P (1988) Specification of cerebral cortical areas. Science 241: 170–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon DK, O'Leary DDM (1992) Development of topographic order in the mammalian retinocollicular projection. J. Neurosci. 12: 1212–1232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperry RW (1963) Chemoaffinity in the orderly growth of nerve fibers patterns and connections. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 50: 703–710.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takemoto M et al. (2002) EphrinB3EphA4 interactions regulate the growth of specific thalamocortical axon populations in vitro. Eur. J. Neurosci. 16: 1168–1172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uziel D et al. (2002) Miswiring of limbic thalamocortical projections in the absence of ephrinA5. J. Neurosci. 22: 9352–9357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanderhaeghen P et al. (2000) A mapping label required for normal scale of body representation in the cortex. Nature Neurosci. 3: 358–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitelaw VA, Cowan JD (1981) Specificity and plasticity of retinotectal connections: A computational model. J. Neurosci. 1: 1369–1387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolpert L (1969). Positional information and spatial pattern of cellular differentiation. J. Theor. Biol. 25: 1–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolpert L (1996). One hundred years of positional information. Trends Genet. 12: 359–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yates PA, Roskies AL, McLaughlin T, O'Leary DDM (2001) Topographicspecific axon branching controlled by ephrinAs is the critical event in retinotectal map development. J. Neurosci. 21: 8548–8563.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yates PA, Holub AD, McLaughlin T, Sejnowski TJ, O'Leary DDM (2004) Computational modeling of retinotopic map development to define contributions of EphAEphrinA gradients, axonaxon interactions, and patterned activity. J. Neurobiol. 59: 95–113.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Sloan-Swartz Center for Theoretical Neurobiology, Division of Biology 216-76, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, 91125, USA

    Jan Karbowski

  2. Department of Mathematics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15260, USA

    G.B. Ermentrout

Authors
  1. Jan Karbowski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. G.B. Ermentrout
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Karbowski, J., Ermentrout, G. Model of the Early Development of Thalamo-Cortical Connections and Area Patterning via Signaling Molecules. J Comput Neurosci 17, 347–363 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JCNS.0000044876.28268.18

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JCNS.0000044876.28268.18

Search

Navigation