Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of Double-Gate MOSFETs and FinFETs with Monte Carlo Simulation

  • Published:
Journal of Computational Electronics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A full-band Monte Carlo simulator has been used to analyze and compare the performance of n-channel double-gate MOSFETs and FinFETs. Size quantization effects were accounted for by using a quantum correction based on Schrödinger equation. FinFETs are a variation of typical double-gate devices with the gate surrounding the channel on three sides. From our simulations, we observed that the quantization effects in double-gate devices are less significant as compared to bulk MOSFETs. The total sheet charge density drops only slightly as the depletion of charge at the interface is counterbalanced by the increased volume inversion effect. We also observed an appreciable drop in average velocity distribution when quantum corrections were applied. For FinFETs, the fin extension lengths on either side of the gate affect the device performance significantly. These underlap regions have low carrier concentration and behave as large resistors. The current drops non-linearly with increasing fin extension lengths.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Semiconductor Industry Association. (2001). International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors. Online at: http:// public.itrs.net/Files/2001ITRS/Home.htm.

  2. Y. Choi, N. Lindert, P. Xuan, S. Tang, D. Ha, E. Anderson, T. King, J. Bokor, and C. Hu, IEDM Tech. Dig., 421 (2001).

  3. G. Pei, J. Kedzierski, P. Oldiges, M. Ieong, and E.C. Kan, IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, 49, 1411 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  4. H. Tsuchiya and T. Miyoshi, IEICE Trans. Electron, E82-C, 880 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  5. D. K. Ferry, Superlattice Microstructures, 27, 61 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  6. M.V. Fischettiand S.F. Laux, Physical Review B, 48, 2344 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  7. S. Yamakawa, H. Ueno, K. Taniguchi, C. Hamaguchi, K. Miyatsuji, K. Masaki, and U. Ravaioli, J.Appl. Physics, 79, 911 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  8. A.S. Spinelli, A. Benvenuti, and A. Pacelli, IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, 45, 1342.

  9. S.A. Hareland, S. Krishnamurthy, S. Jallepalli, C.-F. Yeap, K. Hasnat, A.F Tasch,and C.M. Maziar, IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, 43, 90 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  10. B. Winstead and U. Ravaioli, IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, 50, 440 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  11. A. Duncan, U. Ravaioli, and J. Jakumeit, IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, 45, 867 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kathawala, G.A., Mohamed, M. & Ravaioli, U. Comparison of Double-Gate MOSFETs and FinFETs with Monte Carlo Simulation. Journal of Computational Electronics 2, 85–89 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JCEL.0000011404.60973.8a

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JCEL.0000011404.60973.8a

Navigation