Skip to main content
Log in

Are Small Recipients Overlooked by Sponsors? An Empirical Note

  • Published:
Journal of Cultural Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This note presents an analysis of data collected on the revenue structure of cultural institutions in Berlin and Hamburg, with a focus on sponsoring. Ex ante there are some reasons why firms, when giving to the arts, might favour large recipients, but also some why they could favour smaller ones. For our sample we find that income from sponsoring per visitor is larger for smaller cultural institutions. Finally, we argue that these results can be considered as evidence for a at least partly altruistic motivation of sponsors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Abbing, Hans (2002) Why Are Artists Poor? Amsterdam University Press.

  • Andreoni, James and Payne, A. Abigail (2001) Government Grants to Private Charities: Do They Crowd Out Giving or Fundraising. Mimeo: http://econwpa.wustl.edu:8089/eps/pe/papers/0111/0111001.pdf.

  • Brooks, Arthur C. (2000) “Is There a Dark Side to Government Support for Nonprofits?” Public Administration Review 60: 211-218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burlingame, Dwight F. and Frishkoff, Patricia A. (1996) “How Does Firm Size Affect Corporate Philanthropy?”, in Dennis R. Young and Dwight F. Burlingame (eds.), Corporate Philanthropy at the Crossroads. Indiana University Press, Bloomington and Indianapolis, pp. 86-104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cave,Martin (1989) “An Introduction to Television Economics”, in Gordon Hughes and David Vines (eds.), Deregulation and the Future of Commercial Television. Aberdeen University Press, pp. 9-37.

  • Frank, Björn, Geppert, Kurt, Vesper, Dieter, Schneider, Bernhard, and Cicéron, Christiane (2002) Kultur als Wirtschaftsfaktor in Berlin. IHK, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galaskiewicz, Joseph (1997) “An Urban Grants Economy Revisited: Corporate Charitable Contributions in the Twin Cities, 1979-81, 1987-89”. Administrative Science Quarterly 42: 445-471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geppert, Kurt, Henne, Claudia, Jeschek,Wolfgang, Neckermann, Gerhard, Seidel, Bernhard, Seufert, Wolfgang, and Vesper, Dieter (1992) Kultur als Wirtschaftsfaktor in Berlin. Vistas, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitters, Erik (1996) “Art Support as Corporate Responsibility in the Postindustrial City of Rotterdam, The Netherlands”, in Rosanne Martorella (ed.), Art and Business. Praeger, Westport, CT and London, pp. 159-168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoek, Janet (1998) “Sponsorship: An Evaluation of Management Assumptions and Practices”. Marketing Bulletin 10: 1-10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoek, Janet A., Gendall, Philip J., and West, Rohan D. (1990) “The Role of Sponsorship in Marketing Planning Selected New Zealand Companies [sic]”. New Zealand Journal of Business 12: 87-95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Orace (1966) “Corporate Philanthropy: An Analysis of Corporate Contributions”. Journal of Business 39: 489-504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koenker, Roger and Hallock, Kevin F. (2001) “Quantile Regression”. Journal of Economic Perspectives 15 (4): 143-156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotler, Philip and Scheff, Joanne (1997) Standing Room Only. Strategies for Marketing the Performing Arts. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leclair, Mark S. and Gordon, Kelly (2000) “Corporate Support for Artistic and Cultural Activities: What Determines the Distribution of Corporate Giving?” Journal of Cultural Economics 24: 225-241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lidström, Bengt (2002) “Arts and Business-Attitudes towards Sponsorship”, Paper presented at the Association for Cultural Economics International Conference, June 13-15, Rotterdam.

  • O'Hagan, John and Harvey, Denice (2000) “Why Do Companies Sponsor Arts Events? Some Evidence and a Proposed Classification”. Journal of Cultural Economics 24: 205-224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maaß , Frank and Clemens, Reinhard (2002) Corporate Citizenship. Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag, Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martorella, Rosanne (1996a) “Introduction”, in Rosanne Martorella (ed.), Art and Business. Praeger, Westport, CT and London, pp. 3-14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martorella, Rosanne (1996b) “Corporate Patronage of the Arts in the United States: A Review of the Research”, in Rosanne Martorella (ed.), Art and Business. Praeger, Westport, CT and London, pp. 17-31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, Bruce M. and Wildman, Steven S. (1992) Video Economics. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA and London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuster, J. Mark Davidson (1988) “Government Leverage of Private Support: Matching Grants and the Problem with 'New' Money”, in Margaret Jane Wyszomirski and Pat Clubb (eds.), The Cost of Culture: Patterns and Prospects of Private Arts Patronage. ACA Books, New York, pp. 63-97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwaiger, Manfred (2001) Messung der Wirkung von Sponsoringaktivitäten im Kulturbereich. Zwischenbericht über ein Projekt im Auftrag des AKS/Arbeitskreis Kultursponsoring. Mimeo: Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, http://www.efoplan.bwl.uni-muenchen.de/pdf/AP0301_Kultursponsoring_AKS.pdf.

  • Sen, Amartya (1970). “The Impossibility of a Paretian Liberal”. Journal of Political Economy 78: 152-157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, Michelle and Galaskiewicz, Joseph (1997) “Corporate-Nonprofit Partnerships: Varieties and Covariates”. New York Law School Review 41: 1059-1090.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, Richard (1993) “Does Government Spending Crowd Out Donations? Interpreting the Evidence”, in Avner Ben-Ner and Benedetto Gui (eds.), The Nonprofit Sector in the Mixed Economy. The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, pp. 99-15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ullrich, Wolfgang (2000) Mit dem Rücken zur Kunst. Die neuen Statussymbole der Macht. Wagenbach, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Useem, Michael (1988) “Market and Institutional Factors in Corporate Contributions”. California Management Review 30: 77-88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Useem, Michael (1989) “Corporate Support for Culture and the Arts”, in Margaret Jane Wyszomirski and Pat Clubb (eds.), The Cost of Culture: Patterns and Prospects of Private Arts Patronage. ACA Books, New York, pp. 45-62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Useem, Michael (1991) “Corporate Funding of the Arts in a Turbulent Environment”. Non-Profit Management and Leadership 1: 329-343.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, Halbert (1980) “A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity”. Econometrica 48: 817-838.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, Chin-Tao (2002) Privatising Culture. Corporate Art Intervention since the 1980s. Verso, London and New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, Dennis R. and Burlingame, Dwight F. (1996) “Paradigm Lost: Research toward a New Understanding of Corporate Philanthropy”, in Dennis R. Young and Dwight F. Burlingame (eds.), Corporate Philanthropy at the Crossroads. Indiana University Press, Bloomington and Indianapolis, pp. 158-176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann, Rainer and von Schmeling, Alexandra (1997) Kulturinvest Top 500. Kothes and Klewes, Düsseldorf.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Frank, B., Geppert, K. Are Small Recipients Overlooked by Sponsors? An Empirical Note. Journal of Cultural Economics 28, 143–156 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JCEC.0000019574.70428.c7

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JCEC.0000019574.70428.c7

Navigation