Abstract
In an ethnoarchaeological case study, we take a gendered perspective on the house as a locus of political life in Conambo, a village of about 200 Achuar- and Quichua-speaking peoples in the Ecuadorian Amazon. In this small-scale society, women and men engage actively in political practice in independent yet complementary ways, and the domestic context is a place where political life is conducted on a daily basis. In this article, the house is examined as a politicized context at three scales of materiality: the organization of settlement in the community, the spatial relationships in the house, and the scale of painted designs on pottery bowls used in the house. At each scale, we identify material correlates of women's and men's participation. Our goal is to bring attention to potential archaeological correlates of women's political involvement in past societies, to question assumptions about women's political lives and domestic spaces, and to expand the ways in which anthropological archaeology may contribute to understanding cross-cultural variation in women's and men's domains of power.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Ashmore W. (2002). Decisions and dispositions: Socializing spatial archaeology. American Anthropologist 104(4): 1172–1183.
Bourdieu P. (1973). The Berber house. In Douglas, M. (ed.), Rules and Meaning, Penguin Education, Harmondsworth, England, pp. 98–110.
Bourdieu P. (1989). Social space and symbolic power. Sociological Theory 7(1): 14–25.
Bourdieu P. (1998). Practical Reason, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA. (Original work published 1994)
Bowser, B. J. (2000). From pottery to politics: An ethnoarchaeological case study of political factionalism, ethnicity, and domestic pottery style in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 7(3): 219–248.
Bowser, B. J. (2002). The Perceptive Potter: An Ethnoarchaeological Study of Pottery, Ethnicity, and Political Action in Amazonia, PhD Dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of California, Santa Barbara. University Microfilms, Ann Arbor.
Bowser, B. J. (2003). The perceptive potter: Beer bowls and political action in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Paper presented at The 68th Annual Meetings of the Society for American Archaeology, Milwaukee, WI.
Bustard, W. (2003). Pueblo Bonito: When a house is not a home. In Neitzel, J. (ed.), Pueblo Bonito: Center of the World, Smithsonian Books, WA, pp. 80–93.
Conkey, M., and Spector, J. D. (1984). Archaeology and the study of gender. In Schiffer, M. B. (ed.), Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, Academic Press, New York, pp. 1–38.
Cosmides, L, and Tooby, J. (1992). Cognitive adaptations for social exchange. In Barkow, J. H., Cosmides, L., and Tooby, J. (eds.), The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture, Oxford University Press, NY, pp. 163–228.
Descola, P. (1996). In the Society of Nature: A Native Ecology in Amazonia, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Descola, P. (1994). In the Society of Nature: A Native Ecology in Amazonia, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Ferguson, T. J. (1996). Historic Zuni Architecture and Society: An Archaeological Application of Space Syntax, Anthropological Papers No. 80, University of Arizona, Tucson.
Giddens, A. (1979). Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure, and Contradiction in Social Analysis, University of California Press, Berkeley.
Grøn, O. (2003). Mesolithic dwelling places in south Scandanavia: Their definition and social interpretation. Antiquity 77:685–708.
Hall, E. T. (1966). The Hidden Dimension, Doubleday, Garden City, New York.
Hall, E. T. (1972). The Silent Language, Anchor Press, Garden City, New York.
Hill, K., and Hurtado, A. M. (1999). Ache Life History: The Ecology and Demography of a Foraging People, Aldine de Gruyter, New York.
Hodder, I. and Cessford, C. (2004). Daily practice and social memory atÇ atalhöyük. American Antiquity 69(1): 17–40.
Hugh-Jones, S. (1995). Inside-out and back to front: The androgenous house in Northwest Amazonia. In Carsten, J., and Hugh-Jones, S. (eds.), About the House, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 226–252.
Ingold, T. (1993). The temporality of the landscape. World Archaeology 25(2): 152–174.
Joyce, R. A. (2000). Heirlooms and houses: Materiality and social memory. In Joyce, R. A., and Gillespie, S. D. (eds.), Beyond Kinship: Social and Material Reproduction in House Societies, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, pp. 189–212.
Joyce, R. A., and Gillespie, S. D. (eds.). (2000). Beyond Kinship: Social and Material Reproduction in House Societies, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia.
Kohler, T. A. (1992). Field houses, villages, and the tragedy of the commons in the early northern Anasazi Southwest. American Antiquity 57(4): 617–635.
Kus, S., and Raharijaona, V. (2000). House to palace, village to state: Scaling up architecture and ideology. American Anthropologist 102:98–113.
Low, B. (1992). Sex, coalitions, and politics in preindustrial societies. Politics and the Life Sciences 11(1): 63–80.
Lucero, L. (2003). The politics of ritual: The emergence of Classic Maya rulers. Current Anthropology 44(4): 523–558.
Meskell, L., Gosden, C., Hodder, I. R., Joyce, R. A., and Preucel, R. (2001). Editorial statement. Journal of Social Archaeology 1(1): 5–12.
Moore, H. (1986). Space, Text, and Gender: An Anthropological Study of the Marakwet of Kenya, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Moore, J. (1996). Architecture and Power in the Ancient Andes, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Nelson, S. (1997). Gender in Archaeology: Analyzing Power and Prestige, Altamira Press, Walnut Creek, CA.
Neupert, M. A. (1999). Potters and Politics: Factionalism and the Organization of Ceramic Production in Paradijon, the Philippines, PhD Dissertation, University of Arizona, Tucson. University Microfilms, Ann Arbor.
Patton, J. Q. (1996). Thoughtful Warriors: Status, Warriorship, and Alliance in the Ecuadorian Amazon, PhD Dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of California, Santa Barbara. University Microfilms, Ann Arbor.
Patton, J. Q. (2000). Reciprocal altruism and warfare: A case study from the Ecuadorian Amazon. In Cronk, L., Chagnon, N., and Irons,W. (eds.), Adaptation and Human Behavior: An Anthropological Perspective, Aldine de Gruyter, New York, pp. 417–436.
Patton, J. Q. (2004). Coalitional effects on reciprocal fairness in the ultimatum game: A case from the Ecuadorian Amazon. In Heinrich, J., Boyd, R., Bowles, S., Camerer, C., Fehr, E., and Gintis, H. (eds.), Foundations of Human Sociality: Economic Experiments and Ethnographic Evidence From Fifteen Small-Scale Societies, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 96–124.
Ramsey, C., and Sleeper, H. (1988). Architectural Graphic Standards, Wiley, New York.
Rapoport, A. (1961). House Form and Culture, Prentice-Hall, Englewood, NJ.
Rapoport, A. (1982). The Meaning of the Built Environment: A Nonverbal Communication Approach, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.
Ross, M. H. (1983). Political decision-making and conflicts: Additional cross-cultural codes and scales. Ethnology XXII(2): 169–192.
Ross, M. H. (1986). Female political participation: A cross-cultural explanation. American Anthropologist 88:843–858.
Smith, A., and David, N. (1995). The production of space and the house of Xidi Sukur. Current Anthropology 36(3): 441–471.
Strathern, M. (1972). Women in Between. Female Roles in a Male World: Mount Hagen, New Guinea, Seminar Press, London.
Sweely, T. L. (1999a). Gender, space, people, and power at Ceren, El Salvador. In Sweely, T. L. (ed.), Manifesting Power: Gender and the Interpretation of Power in Archaeology, Routledge, London, pp. 155–172.
Sweely, T. L. (ed.). (1999b). Manifesting Power: Gender and the Interpretation of Power in Archaeology, Routledge, London.
Weller, S. C., and Romney, A. K. (1988). Systematic Data Collection, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
Whitten, N. (1976). Sacha Runa, University of Illinois Press, Urbana.
Widlok, T. (1999). Mapping spatial and social permeability. Current Anthropology 40(3): 392–400.
Yates, T. (1989). Habitus and social space: Some suggestions about meaning in the Saami (Lapp) tent ca. 1700-1900. In Hodder, I. (ed.), The Meaning of Things: Material Culture and Symbolic Expression, Harper Collins, London, pp. 249–262.
Zedeño, M. N. (2000). On what people make of places: A behavioral cartography. In Schiffer, M. B. (ed.), Social Theory in Archaeology, University of Utah Press, Salt Lake, pp. 98–111.
Zeidler, J. (1983). La etnoarqueología de una vivienda Achuár y sus implicaciónes arqueológicas. Miscelánea Antropológica Ecuatoriana 3:155–193.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bowser, B.J., Patton, J.Q. Domestic Spaces as Public Places: An Ethnoarchaeological Case Study of Houses, Gender, and Politics in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 11, 157–181 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JARM.0000038065.43689.75
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JARM.0000038065.43689.75