Skip to main content
Log in

How Ethical Are Ethical Purchasing Policies?

  • Published:
Journal of Academic Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In recent years ethical purchasing policies have been promoted as potentially effective and promising ways of combatting global inequality and oppressive labour practices in developing countries. These initiatives have been launched on university campuses with the hope of opening a new front for improving labour rights under conditions of neo-liberal globalization. This paper is an attempt to respond to the critics of these policies, and especially their claims that ethical purchasing may have the perverse effect of increasing job losses and undercutting economic development in poorer countries. Although it can be shown that these criticisms are misguided, it is important to acknowledge that ethical purchasing should not be seen as a full-blown alternative to the kind of progress that can be achieved through state-centred labour regulation. Nevertheless, the new role of universities as monitors of corporate responsibility remains a promising one.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Abrami, R. (2003). Worker Rights and Global Trade: The US-Cambodia Bilateral Textile Trade Agreement. Cambridge: Harvard Business School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aidt, T. & Tzannatos, Z. (2002). Unions and Collective Bargaining. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arroyo, A. (2001). Economia en crecimiento? In A. Arroyo (Ed.), Resultados del Trabajode Libre Comercio de America del Norte en Mexico. Mexico City: RMALC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balakrishnan, R. (2002). The Hidden Assembly Line: Gender Dynamics of Subcontracted Work in a Global Economy. Bloomfield, CT: Kumarian Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhagwati, J. (2001, 29 August). Break the link between trade and labour, Financial Times.

  • Birnbaum, D. (2002, 18 November). Marginal countries and marginal factories, just-style/ com.

  • Bonacich, E. & Appelbaum, R. (2000). Behind the Label: Inequality in the Los Angeles Apparel Industry. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, K. (2000). Uneasy Terrain: The Impact of Capital Mobility on Workers, Wages and Union Organizing, Research Paper, US Trade Deficit Review Commission, Washington, DC.

  • Brooke, J. (2004, 24 January). A year of worry for Cambodia's garment makers, New York Times.

  • CAFOD (2004). Clean up Your Computer: Working Conditions in the Electronics Sector. London, UK: CAFOD. Available: http://www.cafod.org.uk

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, A. (2001). China's Workers under Assault. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christian Aid (2004). Behind the Mask: The Real Face of Corporate Social Responsibility. London, UK: Christian Aid. Available: http://www.christianaid.org.uk

    Google Scholar 

  • Connor, T. (2002). We Are not Machines. Oxfam Community Aid Program.

  • Elliott, K. & Freeman, R. (2003). Can Labor Standards Improve under Globalization? Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fung, A. et al. (2001). Realizing Labor Standards. In A. Fung et al. (Eds.), Can We Put an End to Sweatshops? Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, A. & Scorse, J. (2003.) The Nike effect: Anti-sweatshop activists and labor market outcomes in Indonesia. Berkeley: University of California (unpublished paper).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hensman, R. (2001). World Trade and Workers' Rights, Antipode 33, 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Labour Organization (2000). Labour Practices in the Footwear, Leather, Textiles and Clothing Industries. Geneva: ILO.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Labour Organization (2001). Stopping Forced Labour. Geneva: ILO.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Labour Organization (2002a). Declaration on Fundamental Principles at Work. Geneva: ILO.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Labour Organization (2002b). A Future without Child Labour. Geneva: ILO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, J. (2004, 29 January). Workers face uphill battle on road to globalization, New York Times.

  • Kessler, A. (1999, Winter). The North American free Trade Agreement, emerging apparel production networks and industrial upgrading, Review of International Political Economy 6, 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, N. (2000). No Logo. Toronto: Vintage, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolk, A. & Van Tulder, R. (2004). Ethics in international business, Journal of World Business 39, 49-60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louie, M. (2001). Sweatshop Warriors: Immigrant Women Workers Take on the Global Factory. Cambridge, MA: South End Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maquila Solidarity Network and Honduran Independent Monitoring Team (2003). A Canadian Success Story? Gildan Activewear: T-shirts, Free Trade and Worker Rights. Toronto: Maquila Solidarity Network.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMaster University (2002). Code of Labour Practices for University Suppliers and Licensees and Fair Trade Purchasing Policy for University Suppliers and Retailers. Hamilton, ON: McMaster University. Available: http://www.mcmaster.ca/purchase/labour%20code/labour.htm

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. (2003). Why economists are wrong about sweatshops and the antisweatshop movement, Challenge 6(1), 93-122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittelman, J. (2000). The Globalization Syndrome. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Labor Committee (2000). Made in China: The Role of US Companies in Denying Human and Worker Rights. New York: National Labor Committee.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Labor Committee (2001). Worker Rights in the Americas? New York: National Labor Committee.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Labor Committee (2002). Toys of Misery "Made in China." New York: National Labor Commitee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nye, J., Jr. (2002). The Paradox of American Power. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxfam International (2004). Trading away Our Rights: Women Working in Global Supply Chains. Oxford, UK: Oxfam International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obrera, P. (2003). The struggle for justice in the maquiladoras. In T. Wise et al. (Eds.), Confronting Globalization. Bloomfield, CT: Kumarian.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, G. & Xaba, J. (2002). The Workers' Story: Labour Rights Violations at Hudson's Bay Supply Factories in Lesotho. Toronto: Ethical Trading Action Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollin, R. et al. (2001). Global apparel production and sweatshop labor, Political Economy Research Institute, Working Paper series, No. 19.

  • Rendon, T. & Salas, C. (2001). La Evolucion de Empleo. In A. Alcalde et al. (Eds.), Trabajo y Trabajadores en el Mexico Contemporaneo.Mexico City: Miguel Angel Prrua.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, F. & Rodrik, D. (2000). Trade policy and economic growth. In B. Bernanke & K. Rogoff (Eds.), National Bureau of Economic Research Annual. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, E. (2002). Making Sweatshops: Globalization and the US Apparel Industry. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, R. (2002). The New sweatshops in the United States. In G. Gereffi et al. (Eds.), Free Trade and Uneven Development, Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, R. & Chan, A. (2002). From North-South to South-South, Foreign Affairs 81(5).

  • Sen, A. (1999). Development as Freedom. New York: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sethi, S. (2003). Setting Global Standards. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, R. (1999). Reclaiming America. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tait, N. (2002, 15 April). Towards 2005: The survival of the fittest, just-style.com

  • Tsogas, G. (2001). Labor Regulation in a Global Economy. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe. United States International

    Google Scholar 

  • Trade Commission (2004). Textiles and Apparel: Assessment of the Competitiveness of Certain Foreign Suppliers to the US Market. Washington, DC: International Trade Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (1948). Universal Declaration of Human Rights. New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vahapassi, A. (2000). Workplace Monitoring in Asia to Combat Child Labor. Geneva: ILO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varangis, P. et al. (2003). Dealing with the coffee crisis in Central America, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 2993. Washington, DC: World Bank.

  • World Trade Organization (2002). Communication from China, Cuba, India, Kenya, Pakistan and Zimbabwe. Washington, DC: World Trade Organization, Working Group on the Relationship between Trade and Investment.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2003). East Asia Integrates: A Trade Policy for Shared Growth. Washington, DC: World Bank. Available: http://lnweb18.worldbank.org/eap/eap.nsf/Sectors/PREM/ 8D6C0ECF4EDA600285256C40007D32F9?OpenDocument

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2004). Global Economic Prospects. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wells, D. How Ethical Are Ethical Purchasing Policies?. Journal of Academic Ethics 2, 119–140 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JAET.0000039011.17896.05

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JAET.0000039011.17896.05

Navigation