Abstract
The purpose of this quasi-experimental study was to investigate what appears to be a grounding assumption in some adult developmental and educational research: persons of differing epistemologies who are grouped together will understand one another less well than persons who are grouped homogeneously. A robust effect is discussed within the context of adult development theory, research on collaborative learning groups, and Bruffee's social constructionist challenge (K. A. Bruffee, 1993) to Perry and to cognitive development theory. Collateral research questions relating to covariates of developmental position (according to the Perry scheme) are entertained; confirmatory qualitative data are presented.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Aronson, E., & Patnoe, S. (1997). The jigsaw classroom: Building cooperation in the classroom. New York: Longman.
Baxter Magolda, M., & Porterfield, W. (1985). A new approach to assess intellectual development on the Perry scheme. Journal of College Student Personnel, 26, 343-351.
Belenky, M.F., Clinchy, B.M., Goldberger, N.R., & Tarule, J.M., (1986).Woman's ways of knowing.New York:Basic Books.
Bruffee, K.A.(1993).Collaborative learning: Higher education, interdependence, and the authority of knowledge. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins.
Chickering, A (1969). Education and identity. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Chickering, A (Ed.). (1981). The modern American college: Responding to the new realities of diverse students and a changing society. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Commons, M.L., & Richards, F.A. (1984).A general model of stage theory. Applying the general stage model. In M. L. Commons, F.A. Richards, & C. Armon (Eds.), Beyond formal operations: Late adolescent and adult cognitive development (pp.120-157). New York:Praeger.
Cooper, J.L., Robinson, P, & McKinney, M (1994).Cooperative learning in the classroom. In Diane Halpern (Ed.), Changing college classrooms: New teaching and learning strategies for an increasingly complex world (pp.74-92). San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
Creswell, J.W. (1994).Research design: Qualitative & quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
Cross, K.P. (1998, July/August).Why learning communities? Why now? About Campus, 4-11.
Davidson, W.B., House, W.J., & Harm, O.J. (1993).The semantic profile technique for measuring students' impressions of psychology courses.Teaching of Psychology, 20(4),223-225.
Endler, N.S. (1969).Changes in meaning during psychotherapy as measured by the semantic differential. In J. G. Snider, & C. E. Osgood (Eds.), Semantic differential technique: A sourcebook (pp.518-523). Chicago: Aldine.
Gilligan, C (1982). In a different voice. Cambridge: Harvard.
Goldberger, N.R. (1996). Introduction: Looking backward, looking forward. In N. R. Goldberger J.M. Tarule, B.M. Clinchy, & M. F. Belenky (Eds.), Knowledge, difference, and power (pp.1-21). New York: Basic Books.
Goldberger, N.R., Tarule, J.M., Clinchy, B.M., & Belenky, M.F. (Eds.). (1996). Knowledge, difference, and power. New York: Basic Books.
Harvey, O.J.,Hunt, D, & Schroder, H (1961). Conceptual systems and personality organization. New York: Wiley.
Heise, D.E. (1969). Some methodological issues in semantic differential research.Psychological Bulletin, 72(6), 406-422.
Hunt, D.E. (1966). A conceptual systems change model and its application to education. In O. J. Harvey (Ed.), Experience, structure, and adaptability (pp.277-302). New York: Springer.
Jacob, E (1999). Cooperative learning in context. Albany, NY: State University of New York.
Johnson, D.W., & Johnson, R.T. (1989). Cooperation and competition: Theory and research. Edina, MN:Interaction Book.
Johnson, D.W., & Johnson, R.T. (1992). Encouraging thinking through constructive controversy. In N. Davidson, & T. Worsham (Eds.), Enhancing thinking through cooperative learning (pp.120-137). New York: Teachers College Press.
Johnson, D.W., & Johnson, F.P. (2000).Joining together: Groups theory and group skills (7th ed.).Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T., & Smith, K (1991).Active learning: Cooperation in the college classroom.Edina, MN: Interaction Book.
Kegan, R (1982). The evolving self: Problem and process in human development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard.
Kegan, R (1994). In over our heads: The mental demands of modern life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard.
King, P.M. (1978). William Perry's theory of intellectual and ethical development. In L. L. Knefelkamp, C. Widick, & C. A. Parker (Eds.), New directions for student services: Vol. 4. Applying new developmental findings (pp. 35-51). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Kitchener, R.F. (1986).Piaget's theory of knowledge: Genetic epistemology & scientific reason. New Haven: Yale University.
Knefelkamp, L.L. (1980).Faculty and student development in the 80's: Renewing the community of scholars. Current Issues in Higher Education, 2(5), 13-26.
Knefelkamp, L.L., & Slepitza, R (1978). A cognitive-developmental model of career development: An adaptation of the Perry scheme. In C. A. Parker (Ed.), Encouraging development in college students (pp. 135-150). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Kohlberg, L (1984). The psychology of moral development: The nature and validity of moral stages. San Francisco: Harper & Row.
LeUnes, A, Bourgeois, A, & Grajales, R (1996). The effects of two types of exposure on attitudes towards aspects of juvenile delinquency. The Journal of Social Psychology, 136(6), 699-708.
Loevinger, J (1976). Ego development: Conceptions and theories. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Lovell, C (2002). Development and disequilibration: Predicting gain and loss scores on the Supervisee Levels Questionnaire. Journal of Adult Development, 9(3), 235-240.
Mead, G.H. (1934/64). On social psychology. Chicago: University of Chicago.
Melnick, J, & Woods, M (1976). Analysis of group composition research and theory for psychotherapeutic and growth-oriented groups. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 12, 493-512.
Minnich, E.K. (1990).Transforming knowledge. Philadelphia: Temple University.
Moore, W.S. (1987). The Learning Environment Preferences: Establishing preliminary reliability and validity for an objective measure of the Perry scheme of intellectual development. Dissertation Abstracts International, 49(6), 1186A(UMI No. 8808586).
Moore, W.S. (1989).The Learning Environment Preferences: Exploring the construct validity of an objective measure of the Perry scheme of intellectual development.Journal of College Student Development, 30, 504-514.
Moore, W.S. (1990). Measure of intellectual development (MID) instrument manual. Olympia, WA: Center for the Study of Intellectual Development.
Moore, W.S. (1995). My mind exploded: Intellectual development as a critical framework for understanding and assessing collaborative learning. In J. MacGregor, & K. Taylor (Eds.), Assessment in collaborative learning environments. Olympia, WA: Washington Center for Improving Undergraduate Education.
Moreland, R.L., & Levine, J.M. (1992). The composition of small groups. In E. J. Lawler, B. Markovsky, C. Ridgeway, & H. A. Walker (Eds.), Advances in group process (Vol. 9, pp.237-280). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Nappo, L (1998). An evaluation of intellectual development in collaborative preclinical dental hygiene education. Dissertation Abstracts International, 59, 06A.
Osgood, C.E.,Suci, G.J., & Tannenbaum, P.H. (1957).The measurement of meaning. Urbana, IL:University of Illinois.
Pascarella, E.T., & Terenzini, P.T. (1991).How college affects students. San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
Perry, W.G. (1970).Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years: A scheme. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Perry, W.G. (1981). Cognitive and ethical growth: The making of meaning. In A. W. Chickering, & Associates (Eds.), The modern American college (pp.76-116). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Sharan, S (Ed.). (1990). Cooperative learning: Theory and research. New York: Praeger.
Sinnott, J.D. (1984). Postformal reasoning: The relativistic stage. In M. L. Commons, F.A. Richards, & C. Armon (Eds.),Beyond formal operations: Late adolescent and adult cognitive development (pp.298-325). New York: Praeger.
Sinnott, J, & Johnson, L (1996). Reinventing the university. A radical proposal for a problem-focused university. Norwood, NJ: Norwood.
Slavin, R.E. (1990).Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Stake, R.E. (1985). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
Tarule, J.M. (1996). Voices in dialogue. Collaborative ways of knowing. In N. Goldberger, J. Tarule, B. Clinchy, & M. Belenky (Eds.),Knowledge, difference, and power (pp. 274-304). New York: Basic Books.
Thrasher, F, & Bloland, P (1989). Student development studies: A review of published empirical research, 1973–1987. Journal of Counseling and Development, 67(10), 547-554.
Yalom, I. (1995). The theory and practice of group psychotherapy. New York: Basic Books.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lovell, C.W., Nunnery, J. Testing the Adult Development Tower of Babel Hypothesis: Homogeneous by Perry Position Collaborative Learning Groups and Graduate Student Satisfaction. Journal of Adult Development 11, 139–150 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JADE.0000024546.27564.9c
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JADE.0000024546.27564.9c