Skip to main content
Log in

Testing the Adult Development Tower of Babel Hypothesis: Homogeneous by Perry Position Collaborative Learning Groups and Graduate Student Satisfaction

  • Published:
Journal of Adult Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this quasi-experimental study was to investigate what appears to be a grounding assumption in some adult developmental and educational research: persons of differing epistemologies who are grouped together will understand one another less well than persons who are grouped homogeneously. A robust effect is discussed within the context of adult development theory, research on collaborative learning groups, and Bruffee's social constructionist challenge (K. A. Bruffee, 1993) to Perry and to cognitive development theory. Collateral research questions relating to covariates of developmental position (according to the Perry scheme) are entertained; confirmatory qualitative data are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Aronson, E., & Patnoe, S. (1997). The jigsaw classroom: Building cooperation in the classroom. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baxter Magolda, M., & Porterfield, W. (1985). A new approach to assess intellectual development on the Perry scheme. Journal of College Student Personnel, 26, 343-351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belenky, M.F., Clinchy, B.M., Goldberger, N.R., & Tarule, J.M., (1986).Woman's ways of knowing.New York:Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruffee, K.A.(1993).Collaborative learning: Higher education, interdependence, and the authority of knowledge. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chickering, A (1969). Education and identity. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chickering, A (Ed.). (1981). The modern American college: Responding to the new realities of diverse students and a changing society. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commons, M.L., & Richards, F.A. (1984).A general model of stage theory. Applying the general stage model. In M. L. Commons, F.A. Richards, & C. Armon (Eds.), Beyond formal operations: Late adolescent and adult cognitive development (pp.120-157). New York:Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, J.L., Robinson, P, & McKinney, M (1994).Cooperative learning in the classroom. In Diane Halpern (Ed.), Changing college classrooms: New teaching and learning strategies for an increasingly complex world (pp.74-92). San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J.W. (1994).Research design: Qualitative & quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, K.P. (1998, July/August).Why learning communities? Why now? About Campus, 4-11.

  • Davidson, W.B., House, W.J., & Harm, O.J. (1993).The semantic profile technique for measuring students' impressions of psychology courses.Teaching of Psychology, 20(4),223-225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Endler, N.S. (1969).Changes in meaning during psychotherapy as measured by the semantic differential. In J. G. Snider, & C. E. Osgood (Eds.), Semantic differential technique: A sourcebook (pp.518-523). Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C (1982). In a different voice. Cambridge: Harvard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberger, N.R. (1996). Introduction: Looking backward, looking forward. In N. R. Goldberger J.M. Tarule, B.M. Clinchy, & M. F. Belenky (Eds.), Knowledge, difference, and power (pp.1-21). New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberger, N.R., Tarule, J.M., Clinchy, B.M., & Belenky, M.F. (Eds.). (1996). Knowledge, difference, and power. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, O.J.,Hunt, D, & Schroder, H (1961). Conceptual systems and personality organization. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heise, D.E. (1969). Some methodological issues in semantic differential research.Psychological Bulletin, 72(6), 406-422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, D.E. (1966). A conceptual systems change model and its application to education. In O. J. Harvey (Ed.), Experience, structure, and adaptability (pp.277-302). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacob, E (1999). Cooperative learning in context. Albany, NY: State University of New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D.W., & Johnson, R.T. (1989). Cooperation and competition: Theory and research. Edina, MN:Interaction Book.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D.W., & Johnson, R.T. (1992). Encouraging thinking through constructive controversy. In N. Davidson, & T. Worsham (Eds.), Enhancing thinking through cooperative learning (pp.120-137). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D.W., & Johnson, F.P. (2000).Joining together: Groups theory and group skills (7th ed.).Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T., & Smith, K (1991).Active learning: Cooperation in the college classroom.Edina, MN: Interaction Book.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kegan, R (1982). The evolving self: Problem and process in human development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kegan, R (1994). In over our heads: The mental demands of modern life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, P.M. (1978). William Perry's theory of intellectual and ethical development. In L. L. Knefelkamp, C. Widick, & C. A. Parker (Eds.), New directions for student services: Vol. 4. Applying new developmental findings (pp. 35-51). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitchener, R.F. (1986).Piaget's theory of knowledge: Genetic epistemology & scientific reason. New Haven: Yale University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knefelkamp, L.L. (1980).Faculty and student development in the 80's: Renewing the community of scholars. Current Issues in Higher Education, 2(5), 13-26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knefelkamp, L.L., & Slepitza, R (1978). A cognitive-developmental model of career development: An adaptation of the Perry scheme. In C. A. Parker (Ed.), Encouraging development in college students (pp. 135-150). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L (1984). The psychology of moral development: The nature and validity of moral stages. San Francisco: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeUnes, A, Bourgeois, A, & Grajales, R (1996). The effects of two types of exposure on attitudes towards aspects of juvenile delinquency. The Journal of Social Psychology, 136(6), 699-708.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loevinger, J (1976). Ego development: Conceptions and theories. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovell, C (2002). Development and disequilibration: Predicting gain and loss scores on the Supervisee Levels Questionnaire. Journal of Adult Development, 9(3), 235-240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, G.H. (1934/64). On social psychology. Chicago: University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melnick, J, & Woods, M (1976). Analysis of group composition research and theory for psychotherapeutic and growth-oriented groups. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 12, 493-512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minnich, E.K. (1990).Transforming knowledge. Philadelphia: Temple University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, W.S. (1987). The Learning Environment Preferences: Establishing preliminary reliability and validity for an objective measure of the Perry scheme of intellectual development. Dissertation Abstracts International, 49(6), 1186A(UMI No. 8808586).

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, W.S. (1989).The Learning Environment Preferences: Exploring the construct validity of an objective measure of the Perry scheme of intellectual development.Journal of College Student Development, 30, 504-514.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, W.S. (1990). Measure of intellectual development (MID) instrument manual. Olympia, WA: Center for the Study of Intellectual Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, W.S. (1995). My mind exploded: Intellectual development as a critical framework for understanding and assessing collaborative learning. In J. MacGregor, & K. Taylor (Eds.), Assessment in collaborative learning environments. Olympia, WA: Washington Center for Improving Undergraduate Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreland, R.L., & Levine, J.M. (1992). The composition of small groups. In E. J. Lawler, B. Markovsky, C. Ridgeway, & H. A. Walker (Eds.), Advances in group process (Vol. 9, pp.237-280). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nappo, L (1998). An evaluation of intellectual development in collaborative preclinical dental hygiene education. Dissertation Abstracts International, 59, 06A.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osgood, C.E.,Suci, G.J., & Tannenbaum, P.H. (1957).The measurement of meaning. Urbana, IL:University of Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascarella, E.T., & Terenzini, P.T. (1991).How college affects students. San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, W.G. (1970).Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years: A scheme. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, W.G. (1981). Cognitive and ethical growth: The making of meaning. In A. W. Chickering, & Associates (Eds.), The modern American college (pp.76-116). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharan, S (Ed.). (1990). Cooperative learning: Theory and research. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinnott, J.D. (1984). Postformal reasoning: The relativistic stage. In M. L. Commons, F.A. Richards, & C. Armon (Eds.),Beyond formal operations: Late adolescent and adult cognitive development (pp.298-325). New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinnott, J, & Johnson, L (1996). Reinventing the university. A radical proposal for a problem-focused university. Norwood, NJ: Norwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slavin, R.E. (1990).Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stake, R.E. (1985). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarule, J.M. (1996). Voices in dialogue. Collaborative ways of knowing. In N. Goldberger, J. Tarule, B. Clinchy, & M. Belenky (Eds.),Knowledge, difference, and power (pp. 274-304). New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thrasher, F, & Bloland, P (1989). Student development studies: A review of published empirical research, 1973–1987. Journal of Counseling and Development, 67(10), 547-554.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yalom, I. (1995). The theory and practice of group psychotherapy. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lovell, C.W., Nunnery, J. Testing the Adult Development Tower of Babel Hypothesis: Homogeneous by Perry Position Collaborative Learning Groups and Graduate Student Satisfaction. Journal of Adult Development 11, 139–150 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JADE.0000024546.27564.9c

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JADE.0000024546.27564.9c

Navigation