Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Age and Gender Differences in the Sources of Self-Evaluation Valued by Adult Athletes

  • Published:
Journal of Adult Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Researchers have demonstrated that competency judgments can vary depending on the source of self-evaluation used. This study investigated age and gender differences in 459 adult tennis players' importance ratings for ten different competence information sources. As predicted, younger adults were more likely than older adults to value temporal comparisons, both past-to-present (i.e., personal improvement) and present-to-future (i.e., comparisons with future selves). Younger adults were more likely to value feedback from family for self-evaluation. Older adults were slightly more likely to rate comparisons with agemates as important. Women more than men valued feedback from tennis others, effort, and liking for the sport. The findings are consistent with theoretical models and point to new areas of investigation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

REFERENCES

  • Alagna, S. W. (1982). Sex role identity, peer evaluation of competition, and the responses of women and men in a competitive situation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 546-554.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albert, S. (1977). Temporal comparison theory. Psychological Review, 84, 485-503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber, H. (1998). Examining gender differences in sources and levels of perceived competence in interscholastic coaches. The Sport Psychologist, 12, 237-252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297-334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebbeck, V. (1990). Sources of performance information in the exercise setting. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 12, 56-65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. A. (1954). A theory of social comparison process. Human Relations, 7, 117-140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, K. S., & Ruble, D. N. (1990). Strategies for comparative evaluation: Maintaining a sense of competence across the life span. In R. J. Sternberg & J. KolliganJr. (Eds.), Competence considered (pp. 167-189). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayflick, L. (1996). How and why we age. New York: Ballantine Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrald, M. M., & Lucker, G. W. (1995). Ethnic and gender variations in the sources of information used to evaluate performance in the exercise setting. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25, 2180-2191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, T. S., & Amorose, A. J. (1998). Sources of competence information. In J. L. Duda (Ed.), Advances in sport and exercise psychology measurement. Morgantown, WV: Fitness Information Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, T. S., Glenn, S. D., & Wentzell, A. B. (1993). Sources of information underlying personal ability judgments in high school athletes. Pediatric Exercise Science, 5, 263-274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, T. S., & Hasbrook, C. (1986). Informational components influencing children's perceptions of their physical competence. In M. R. Weiss & D. Gould (Eds.), Sport for children and youths. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, T. S., & Hasbrook, C. (1987). Psychological characteristics and the criteria children use for self-evaluation. Journal of Sport Psychology, 9, 208-221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, T. S., & Weiss, M. R. (1991). A developmental analysis of children's self-ability judgments in the physical domain. Pediatric Exercise Science, 3, 310-326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosnik, W., Winslow, L., Kline, D., Rasinski, K., & Sekuler, R. (1988). Visual changes in daily life. Journal of Gerontology, 5, 227-235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markus, H., Cross, S., & Wurf, E. (1990). The role of the self-system in competence. In R. J. Sternberg & J. Kolligan Jr. (Eds.), Competence considered (pp. 167-189). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedhazur, E. J. (1982). Multiple regression in behavioral research. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pomerantz, E. M., Saxon, J. L., & Kenney, G. A. (2001). Self-evaluation: The development of sex differences. In G. B. Moskowitz (Ed.), Cognitive social psychology: The Princeton symposium on the legacy and future of social cognition (pp. 59-73). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, T. (1991). Gender and the influence of evaluations on self-assessments in achievement settings. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 297-308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, T., & Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (1994). Gender comparisons in responsiveness to others' evaluations in achievement settings. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 221-240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruble, D. N., Boggiano, A. K., Feldman, N. S., & Loebl, J. H. (1980). Developmental analysis of the role of social comparison in self-evaluation. Developmental Psychology, 16, 105-115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruble, D. N., & Flett, G. L. (1988). Conflicting goals in self-evaluative information seeking: Developmental and ability level differences. Child Development, 59, 97-106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruble, D. N., & Frey, K. S. (1991). Changing patterns of comparative behavior as skills are acquired: A functional model of self-evaluation. In J. Suls (Ed.), Social comparison: Contemporary theory and research (pp. 79-113). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, R., & Curnow, C. (1988). Peak performance and age among super athletes: Track and field, swimming, baseball, tennis, and golf. Journal of Gerontology, 43, 113-120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwalbe, M. L., & Staples, C. L. (1991). Gender differences in sources of self-esteem. Social Psychology Quarterly, 54, 158-168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedikides, C., & Skowronski, J. J. (1995). On the sources of self-knowledge: The perceived primacy of self-reflection. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 14, 144-270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, D. (1989). Human growth after birth. New York: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stipek, D., & Mac Iver, D. (1989). Developmental change in children's assessment of intellectual competence. Child Development, 60, 521-538.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wayment, H. A., & Campbell, S. (2000). How are we doing? The impact of motives and information use on the evaluation of romantic relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 17, 31-52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, M. R., Ebbeck, V., & Horn, T. S. (1997). Children's self-perceptions and sources of physical competence information: A cluster analysis. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 19, 52-70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, L. (1994). Goal orientations and athletes' preferences for competence information sources. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 16, 416-430.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Behavioral Sciences, University of Michigan – Dearborn, Dearborn, Michigan, 48128

    Jane P. Sheldon

Authors
  1. Jane P. Sheldon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jane P. Sheldon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sheldon, J.P. Age and Gender Differences in the Sources of Self-Evaluation Valued by Adult Athletes. Journal of Adult Development 11, 47–53 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JADE.0000012527.43815.e5

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JADE.0000012527.43815.e5

Search

Navigation