Empathising and Systemising in Adults with and without Asperger Syndrome

Abstract

An experiment was devised to test the empathising–systemising (E–S) theory of autism. Three groups of participants took part in the study: males with Asperger Syndrome (AS) (n = 18), males without AS, (n = 44) and females from the general population (n = 45). Each participant completed two tasks: one that involved empathising and another that involved systemising. On the empathising task, females scored significantly higher than control males who in turn scored higher than males with AS. Conversely, females scored significantly lower than both male groups on the systemising task, who did not differ significantly from each other. These results are in line with both the E–S theory of autism and the ‘extreme male brain’ theory of autism. Alternative explanations of the results are also explored, including an interpretation through the idea of open and closed systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. APA. (1994). DSM-IV diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, (4th ed.). Washington DC: American Psychiatric Association.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Argyle, M., & Cook, M. (1976). Gaze and mutual gaze Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Asperger, H. (1944). Die “Autistischen Psychopathen” im Kindesalter. Archiv fur Psychiatrie und Nervenkrankheiten, 117, 76-136.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Banerjee, M. (1997). Hidden emotions: Pre-schoolers' knowledge of appearance-reality and emotion display rules. Social Cognition, 15, 107-132.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Baron-Cohen, S. (1997). Are children with autism superior at folk physics? In H. Wellman & K. Inagaki (Ed.), Children's theories New direction for child development series. Jossey-Bass Inc.

  6. Baron-Cohen, S. (1999). The extreme male-brain theory of autism In H. Tager-Flusberg (Ed.), Neurodevelopmental disorders. MIT Press.

  7. Baron-Cohen, S. (2002). The extreme male brain theory of autism. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(6), 248-254.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Baron-Cohen, S., & Hammer, J. (1997). Is autism an extreme form of the male brain? Advances in Infancy Research, 11, 193-217.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Baron-Cohen, S., Jolliffe, T., Mortimore, C., & Robertson, M. (1997). Another advanced test of theory of mind: Evidence from very high functioning adults with autism or Asperger Syndrome. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 38, 813-822.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A. M., & Frith, U. (1985). Does the autistic child have a ‘theory of mind’? Cognition, 21, 37-46.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Baron-Cohen, S., O'Riordan, M., Stone, V., Jones, R., & Plaisted, K. (1999). Recognition of faux pas by normally developing children and children with Asperger Syndrome or high-functioning autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 29, 407-418.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Baron-Cohen, S., Richler, J., Bisarya, D., Gurunathan, N., & Wheelwright, S. (2003). The Systemising Quotient (SQ): An investigation of adults with Asperger Syndrome or High Functioning Autism and normal sex differences. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, Series B. Special issue on “Autism: Mind and Brain”, 358, 361-374.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Lawson, J., Griffin, R., & Hill, J. (2002). The exact mind: Empathising and systemising in autism spectrum conditions. In U. Goswami (Ed.), Handbook of cognitive development. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Spong, A., Scahill, V., & Lawson, J. (2001). Are intuitive physics and intuitive psychology independent? Journal of Developmental and Learning Disorders, 5(1), 47-78.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bhaskar, R. (1978). A realist theory of science. Harvester Press.

  16. Bosacki, S., & Astington, J. W. (1999). Theory of mind in preadolescence: Relations between social understanding and social competence. Social Development, 8, 237-255.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Charman, T., Ruffman, T., & Clements, W. (2002). Is there a gender difference in false belief development? Social Development, (11), 1-10.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Connellan, J., Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Ba'tki, A., & Ahluwalia, J. (2001). Sex differences in human neonatal social perception. Infant Behavior and Development, 23, 113-118.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Crawford, J. R., Stewart, L. E., Parker, D. M., Besson, J. A. O., & DeLacy, G. (1989). Prediction of WAIS IQ with the National Adult Reading Test: Cross-validation and extension. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 28, 267-273.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Cutting, A. L., & Dunn, J. (1999). Theory of mind, emotion understanding, language and family background: Individual differences and interrelations. Child Development, 70(4), 853-865.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Dennett, D. (1987). The intentional stance. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press/Bradford Books.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Eisenberg, N., & Lennon, R. (1983). Sex differences in empathy and related capacities. Psychological Bulletin, 94, 100-131.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Frith, U. (1989). Autism: explaining the enigma. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Gillberg, C. (1989). Asperger syndrome in 23 Swedish children. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 31, 520-531.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hall, J. A. (1985). Nonverbal sex differences: Communication accuracy and expressive style Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Halpern, D. (1992). Sex differences in cognitive ability. Laurence Erlbaum Assoc.

  28. Halpern, D. F., & Wright, T. M. (1996). A process-oriented model of cognitive sex differences. Learning and Individual Differences, 8, 3-24.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Happe, F. (1996). Studying weak central coherence at low levels: Children with autism do not succumb to visual illusions. A research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 37, 873-877.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Hyde, J. S. (1990). Meta-analysis and the psychology of sex differences. Signs, 16, 55-73.

    Google Scholar 

  31. ICD-10 (1994). International classification of diseases (10th ed.). Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organisation.

  32. Jarrold, C., Butler, D. W., Cottington, E. M., & Jimenez, F. (2000). Linking theory of mind and central coherence bias in autism and in the general population. Developmental Psychology, 36(1), 126-138.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Kanner, L. (1943). Autistic disturbance of affective contact. Nervous Child, 2, 217-250.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Kimura, D. (1999). Sex and cognition Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Lawson, J. (2003). Depth accessibility difficulties: An alternative conceptualisation of autism spectrum conditions. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 33(2), 189-202.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Lutchmaya, S., Baron-Cohen, S., & Raggett, P. (2002). Foetal testosterone and eye contact at 12 months. Infant Behaviour and Development, 25, 327-335.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Nelson, H. E., & Willison, J. (1991). The national adult reading test (NART) (2nd ed.). Berkshire, Windsor: N.E.F.R.–Nelson.

    Google Scholar 

  38. NIIP, N.I.o.I.P. (n.d.). vincent mechanical diagrams test: NFER Publishing.

  39. Ozonoff, S., Pennington, B., & Rogers, S. (1991). Executive function deficits in high-functioning autistic children: Relationship to theory of mind. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 32, 1081-1106.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Richardson, J. T. E. (1997). Introduction to the study of gender differences in cognition. InP. J. Caplan, M. Crawford, J. Shibley Hyde & J. T. E. Richardson (Eds.), Gender differences in human cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Russell, J. (Ed.). (1997). Autism as an executive disorder. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Schopler, E. (1985). Convergence of learning disability, higher-level autism, and Asperger's syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 15, 359.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Stanley, J. C., Benbow, C. P., Brody, L. E., Dauber, S., & Lupkowski, A. E. (1991). Gender differences on eighty-six nationally standardized aptitude and achievement tests. InN. Colangelo, S. G. Assouline & D. L. Ambroson (Eds.), Talent development. New York: Trillium Press.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Stone, V. E., Baron-Cohen, S., & Knight, R. T. (1998). Frontal lobe contributions to theory of mind. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 640-656.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Voyer, D., Voyer, S., & Bryden, M. (1995). Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: A meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 250-270.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Wechsler, D. (1997). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-III (WAIS-III). The psychological corporation. San Antonio TX.

  47. Wechsler, D. (1999). Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence (WASI). The psychological corporation. San Antonio TX.

  48. Wing, L. (1981). Asperger Syndrome: A clinical account. Psychological Medicine, 11, 115-130.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Lawson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lawson, J., Baron-Cohen, S. & Wheelwright, S. Empathising and Systemising in Adults with and without Asperger Syndrome. J Autism Dev Disord 34, 301–310 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JADD.0000029552.42724.1b

Download citation

  • Empathising
  • systemising
  • autism
  • asperger syndrome
  • theory of mind