Empathising and Systemising in Adults with and without Asperger Syndrome

  • John LawsonEmail author
  • Simon Baron-Cohen
  • Sally Wheelwright


An experiment was devised to test the empathising–systemising (E–S) theory of autism. Three groups of participants took part in the study: males with Asperger Syndrome (AS) (n = 18), males without AS, (n = 44) and females from the general population (n = 45). Each participant completed two tasks: one that involved empathising and another that involved systemising. On the empathising task, females scored significantly higher than control males who in turn scored higher than males with AS. Conversely, females scored significantly lower than both male groups on the systemising task, who did not differ significantly from each other. These results are in line with both the E–S theory of autism and the ‘extreme male brain’ theory of autism. Alternative explanations of the results are also explored, including an interpretation through the idea of open and closed systems.

Empathising systemising autism asperger syndrome theory of mind 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. APA. (1994). DSM-IV diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, (4th ed.). Washington DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
  2. Argyle, M., & Cook, M. (1976). Gaze and mutual gaze Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Asperger, H. (1944). Die “Autistischen Psychopathen” im Kindesalter. Archiv fur Psychiatrie und Nervenkrankheiten, 117, 76-136.Google Scholar
  4. Banerjee, M. (1997). Hidden emotions: Pre-schoolers' knowledge of appearance-reality and emotion display rules. Social Cognition, 15, 107-132.Google Scholar
  5. Baron-Cohen, S. (1997). Are children with autism superior at folk physics? In H. Wellman & K. Inagaki (Ed.), Children's theories New direction for child development series. Jossey-Bass Inc.Google Scholar
  6. Baron-Cohen, S. (1999). The extreme male-brain theory of autism In H. Tager-Flusberg (Ed.), Neurodevelopmental disorders. MIT Press.Google Scholar
  7. Baron-Cohen, S. (2002). The extreme male brain theory of autism. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(6), 248-254.Google Scholar
  8. Baron-Cohen, S., & Hammer, J. (1997). Is autism an extreme form of the male brain? Advances in Infancy Research, 11, 193-217.Google Scholar
  9. Baron-Cohen, S., Jolliffe, T., Mortimore, C., & Robertson, M. (1997). Another advanced test of theory of mind: Evidence from very high functioning adults with autism or Asperger Syndrome. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 38, 813-822.Google Scholar
  10. Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A. M., & Frith, U. (1985). Does the autistic child have a ‘theory of mind’? Cognition, 21, 37-46.Google Scholar
  11. Baron-Cohen, S., O'Riordan, M., Stone, V., Jones, R., & Plaisted, K. (1999). Recognition of faux pas by normally developing children and children with Asperger Syndrome or high-functioning autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 29, 407-418.Google Scholar
  12. Baron-Cohen, S., Richler, J., Bisarya, D., Gurunathan, N., & Wheelwright, S. (2003). The Systemising Quotient (SQ): An investigation of adults with Asperger Syndrome or High Functioning Autism and normal sex differences. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, Series B. Special issue on “Autism: Mind and Brain”, 358, 361-374.Google Scholar
  13. Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Lawson, J., Griffin, R., & Hill, J. (2002). The exact mind: Empathising and systemising in autism spectrum conditions. In U. Goswami (Ed.), Handbook of cognitive development. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  14. Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Spong, A., Scahill, V., & Lawson, J. (2001). Are intuitive physics and intuitive psychology independent? Journal of Developmental and Learning Disorders, 5(1), 47-78.Google Scholar
  15. Bhaskar, R. (1978). A realist theory of science. Harvester Press.Google Scholar
  16. Bosacki, S., & Astington, J. W. (1999). Theory of mind in preadolescence: Relations between social understanding and social competence. Social Development, 8, 237-255.Google Scholar
  17. Charman, T., Ruffman, T., & Clements, W. (2002). Is there a gender difference in false belief development? Social Development, (11), 1-10.Google Scholar
  18. Connellan, J., Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Ba'tki, A., & Ahluwalia, J. (2001). Sex differences in human neonatal social perception. Infant Behavior and Development, 23, 113-118.Google Scholar
  19. Crawford, J. R., Stewart, L. E., Parker, D. M., Besson, J. A. O., & DeLacy, G. (1989). Prediction of WAIS IQ with the National Adult Reading Test: Cross-validation and extension. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 28, 267-273.Google Scholar
  20. Cutting, A. L., & Dunn, J. (1999). Theory of mind, emotion understanding, language and family background: Individual differences and interrelations. Child Development, 70(4), 853-865.Google Scholar
  21. Dennett, D. (1987). The intentional stance. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press/Bradford Books.Google Scholar
  22. Eisenberg, N., & Lennon, R. (1983). Sex differences in empathy and related capacities. Psychological Bulletin, 94, 100-131.Google Scholar
  23. Frith, U. (1989). Autism: explaining the enigma. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  24. Gillberg, C. (1989). Asperger syndrome in 23 Swedish children. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 31, 520-531.Google Scholar
  25. Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Hall, J. A. (1985). Nonverbal sex differences: Communication accuracy and expressive style Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Halpern, D. (1992). Sex differences in cognitive ability. Laurence Erlbaum Assoc.Google Scholar
  28. Halpern, D. F., & Wright, T. M. (1996). A process-oriented model of cognitive sex differences. Learning and Individual Differences, 8, 3-24.Google Scholar
  29. Happe, F. (1996). Studying weak central coherence at low levels: Children with autism do not succumb to visual illusions. A research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 37, 873-877.Google Scholar
  30. Hyde, J. S. (1990). Meta-analysis and the psychology of sex differences. Signs, 16, 55-73.Google Scholar
  31. ICD-10 (1994). International classification of diseases (10th ed.). Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organisation.Google Scholar
  32. Jarrold, C., Butler, D. W., Cottington, E. M., & Jimenez, F. (2000). Linking theory of mind and central coherence bias in autism and in the general population. Developmental Psychology, 36(1), 126-138.Google Scholar
  33. Kanner, L. (1943). Autistic disturbance of affective contact. Nervous Child, 2, 217-250.Google Scholar
  34. Kimura, D. (1999). Sex and cognition Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  35. Lawson, J. (2003). Depth accessibility difficulties: An alternative conceptualisation of autism spectrum conditions. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 33(2), 189-202.Google Scholar
  36. Lutchmaya, S., Baron-Cohen, S., & Raggett, P. (2002). Foetal testosterone and eye contact at 12 months. Infant Behaviour and Development, 25, 327-335.Google Scholar
  37. Nelson, H. E., & Willison, J. (1991). The national adult reading test (NART) (2nd ed.). Berkshire, Windsor: N.E.F.R.–Nelson.Google Scholar
  38. NIIP, N.I.o.I.P. (n.d.). vincent mechanical diagrams test: NFER Publishing.Google Scholar
  39. Ozonoff, S., Pennington, B., & Rogers, S. (1991). Executive function deficits in high-functioning autistic children: Relationship to theory of mind. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 32, 1081-1106.Google Scholar
  40. Richardson, J. T. E. (1997). Introduction to the study of gender differences in cognition. InP. J. Caplan, M. Crawford, J. Shibley Hyde & J. T. E. Richardson (Eds.), Gender differences in human cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Russell, J. (Ed.). (1997). Autism as an executive disorder. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Schopler, E. (1985). Convergence of learning disability, higher-level autism, and Asperger's syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 15, 359.Google Scholar
  43. Stanley, J. C., Benbow, C. P., Brody, L. E., Dauber, S., & Lupkowski, A. E. (1991). Gender differences on eighty-six nationally standardized aptitude and achievement tests. InN. Colangelo, S. G. Assouline & D. L. Ambroson (Eds.), Talent development. New York: Trillium Press.Google Scholar
  44. Stone, V. E., Baron-Cohen, S., & Knight, R. T. (1998). Frontal lobe contributions to theory of mind. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 640-656.Google Scholar
  45. Voyer, D., Voyer, S., & Bryden, M. (1995). Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: A meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 250-270.Google Scholar
  46. Wechsler, D. (1997). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-III (WAIS-III). The psychological corporation. San Antonio TX.Google Scholar
  47. Wechsler, D. (1999). Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence (WASI). The psychological corporation. San Antonio TX.Google Scholar
  48. Wing, L. (1981). Asperger Syndrome: A clinical account. Psychological Medicine, 11, 115-130.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • John Lawson
    • 1
    Email author
  • Simon Baron-Cohen
    • 1
  • Sally Wheelwright
    • 1
  1. 1.Autism Research Centre, Departments of Experimental Psychology and PsychiatryUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations