Abstract
In this paper, we summarize some of our findings from a series of three meta-analyses and discuss their implications for autism research. In the first meta-analysis, we examined studies addressing the theory of mind hypothesis in autism. This analysis revealed that theory of mind disabilities are not unique to autism, although what may be unique is the severity of the dysfunction in this group. Variables such as the chronological and mental age of the participants, and the matching procedures that the researchers employed, were found to be significant moderator variables. In the next two meta-analyses, data regarding siblings and parents of individuals with autism were analyzed. Type of comparison group (e.g., siblings or parents of individuals with Down syndrome or learning disabilities) and type of outcome measure (cognitive, psychiatric, language) were found to be important moderator variables. Furthermore, method of assessing the psychiatric difficulties (e.g., self-report, clinical measures) was found to be a moderator variable in parents' meta-analysis. Suggestions for future research are discussed, high-lighting variables such as type of comparison group, matching procedures, chronological and mental ages, gender, and birth order.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Reference
American Psychiatric Association. (1980). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A. M., & Frith, U. (1985). Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind”? Cognition, 21, 37-46.
Beeghly, M., Weiss-Perry, B., & Cicchetti, D. (1990). Beyond sensorimotor functioning: Early communicative and play development of children with Down syndrome. In D. Cichetti & M. Deeghly (Eds.), Children with Down syndrome: A developmental approach (pp. 329-368). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Burack, J. A., Charman, T., Yirmiya, N., & Zelazo, P. R. (2001). Development and autism: Messages from developmental psychopathology. In The development of autism: Perspectives from theory and research (pp. 3-16). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Capps, L., Yirmiya, N., & Sigman, M. (1992). Understanding of simple and complex emotions in non-retarded children with autism. Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 33, 1169-1182.
Frith, U., & Happe, F. (1999). Theory of mind and self-consciousness: What is it like to be autistic? Mind and Language, 14, 1-22.
Hill, E. L., & Frith, U. (2003). Understanding autism: Insights from mind and brain. Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences, Vol. 358, no. 1430, pp. 281-289. The Royal Society: UK.
Lainhart, J. E., Ozonoff, S., Coon, H., Krasny, L., Dinh, E., Nice, J., & McMahon, W. (2002). Autism, regression, and the broader autism phenotype. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 113, 231-237.
Leboyer, M., Plumet, M. H., Goldblum, M. C., Perez-Diaz, F., & Marchaland, C. (1995). Verbal versus visuospatial abilities in relatives of autistic females. Developmental Neuropsychology, 11, 139-155.
Mundy, P., Sigman, M., Kasari, C., & Yirmiya, N. (1988). Nonverbal communication skills in Down syndrome children. Child Development, 59, 235-249.
Pilowsky, T., Yirmiya, N., Arbelle, S., & Moses, T. (2000). Theory of mind abilities of children with schizophrenia, children with autism, and normally developing children. Schizophrenia Research, 42, 145-155.
Piven, J. (2001). The broad autism phenotype: A complementary strategy for molecular genetic studies of autism. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 105, 34-35.
Piven, J., Palmer, P., Jacobi, D., Childress, D., & Arndt, S. (1997). Broader autism phenotype: Evidence from a family history study of multiple-incidence autism families. American Journal of Psychiatry, 154, 185-190.
Sigman, M. (1994). What are the core deficits in autism? In S. H. Berman & J. Gould (Eds.), Atypical cognitive deficits in developmental disorders: Implications for brain functioning (pp. 139-157). New Jersey & London: Erlbaum.
Sigman, M. (1996). Behavioral research in childhood autism. In M. Lenzenwager & J. Hougaard (Eds.), Frontiers of developmental psychopathology (pp. 190-206). New York: Oxford University Press.
Sigman, M., & Ruskin, E. (1999). Continuity and change in the social competence of children with autism, Down syndrome, and developmental delays. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 64, 1-114.
Szatmari, P., MacLean, J. E., Jones, M. B., Bryson, S. E., Zwaigenbaum, L., Bartolucci, G., Mahoney, W. J., & Tuff, L. (2000). The familial aggregation of the lesser variant in biological and nonbiological relatives of PDD probands: A family history study. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 41, 579-586.
Wadsworth, S. J., DeFries, J. C., Fulker, D. W., & Plomin, R. (1995). Cognitive ability and academic achievement in the Colorado Adoption Project: A multivariate genetic analysis of parentoffspring and sibling data. Behavior Genetics, 25, 1-15.
Wagner, S., Ganiban, J. M., & Cicchetti, D. (1990). Attention, memory and perception in infants with Down syndrome: A review and commentary. In D. Cicchetti and M. Beeghly (Eds.), Children with Down syndrome: A developmental perspective (pp. 147-179). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Yirmiya, N., Erel, O., Shaked, M., & Solomonica-Levi, D. (1998). Meta-analyses comparing theory of mind abilities of individuals with autism, individuals with mental retardation, and normally developing individuals. Psychological Bulletin, 2, 283-307.
Yirmiya, N., Shaked, M., & Erel, O. (2001). Comparison of siblings of individuals with autism and siblings of individuals with diagnoses other than autism: An empirical summary. In E. Schopler, N. Yirmiya, C. Shulman, & L. M. Marcus (Eds.), The research basis for autism intervention (pp. 59-74). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
Yirmiya, N., & Shaked, M. (in press). Psychiatric disorders in parents of children with autism: A meta-analysis. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry.
Zelazo, P. D., Burack, J., Benedetto, E., & Frye, D. (1996). Theory of mind and rule use in individuals with Down syndrome: A test of the uniqueness and specificity claims. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 37, 479-484.
Zelazo, P. D., Burack, J. A., Boseivski, J. J., Jacques, S., & Frye, D. (2001). A cognitive complexity and control framework for the study of autism. In J. A. Burack, T. Charman, N. Yirmiya, and P. R. Zelazo (Eds.), The development of autism: Perspectives from theory and research (pp. 195-218). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shaked, M., Yirmiya, N. Matching Procedures in Autism Research: Evidence from Meta-Analytic Studies. J Autism Dev Disord 34, 35–40 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JADD.0000018072.42845.83
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JADD.0000018072.42845.83