Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Trouble Ahead: Predicting Antisocial Trajectories with Dynamic Systems Concepts and Methods

  • Commentary
  • Published:
Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper reviews and evaluates a set of studies that utilize dynamic systems (DS) principles, and in two cases dynamic systems methods, for predicting antisocial development and other behavioral outcomes. I suggest that the emphasis of DS approaches on process and nonlinear causation is very different from the emphasis in developmental psychopathology on prediction, yet the marriage of these approaches is necessary to capture the complex interactions that give rise to problematic trajectories. The studies reviewed do indeed uncover predictive relations that would have been difficult to conceptualize or impossible to find using more traditional strategies. In discussing these studies, I suggest DS interpretations of emerging individual differences, phase-specific change, sleeper effects, mediating variables, and behavioral rigidity versus malleability, in the context of developmental prediction. I also discuss the advantages of moving from DS concepts to DS methods in clinical-developmental research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

REFERENCES

  • Arrow, H., McGrath, J. E., & Berdahl, J. L. (2000). Small groups as complex system: Formation, coordination, development, and adaptation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camras, L. A. (1992). Expressive development and basic emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 6, 269-283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deater-Deckard, K., Atzaba-Poria, N., & Pike, A. (2004). Mother-and father-child mutuality in Anglo and Indian British families: A link with lower externalizing problems. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 32, 609-620.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dishion, T. J., Nelson, S. E., Winter, C. E., & Bullock, B. M. (2004). Adolescent friendship as a dynamic system: Entropy and deviance in the etiology and course of male antisocial behavior. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 32, 651-663.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fogel, A., Nwokah, E., Dedo, J. Y., Messinger, D., Dickson, K. L., Matusov, E., et al. (1992). Social process theory of emotion: A dynamic systems approach. Social Development, 1, 122-142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fogel, A., & Thelen, E. (1987). The development of early expressive and communicative action: Re-interpreting the evidence from a dynamic systems perspective. Developmental Psychology, 23, 747-761.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottman, J. M., Murray, J. D., Swanson, C. C., Tyson, R., & Swanson, K. R. (2002). The mathematics of marriage: Dynamic nonlinear models. Cambridge, MA: Bradfrod/MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granic, I., & Hollenstein, T. (2003). Dynamic systems methods for models of developmental psychopathology. Development and Psychopathology, 15, 641-669.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granic, I., & Hollenstein, T. (in press). A survey of dynamic systems methods for developmental psychopathology. In D. Cicchetti & D. J. Cohen (Eds.), Developmental Psychopathology (2nd ed.).

  • Granic, I., Hollenstein, T., Dishion, T. J., & Patterson, G. R. (2003). Longitudinal analysis of flexibility and reorganization in early adolescence: A dynamic systems study of family interactions. Developmental Psychology, 39, 606-617.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granott, N., & Parziale, J. (2002). Microdevelopment: Transition processes in development and learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollenstein, T., Granic, I., Stoolmiller, M., & Snyder, J. (2004). Rigidity in parent-child interactions and the development of externalizing and internalizing behavior in early childhood. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 32, 595-607.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, H.-C., & Fogel, A. (2003). Stability and transitions in mother-infant face-to-face communication during the first 6 months: A microhistorical approach. Developmental Psychology, 39, 1061-1082.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keating, D. P. (1990). Developmental processes in the socialization of cognitive structures. In Development and learning: Proceedings of a symposium in honour of Wolfgang Edelstein on his 60th birthday (pp.37-72). Berlin: Max Planck Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, M. D. (1995). Cognition-emotion feedback and the self-organization of developmental paths. Human Development, 38, 71-102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, M. D., & Granic, I. (1999). Who put the self in self-organization? A clarification of terms and concepts for developmental Psychopathology. Development and Psychopathology, 11, 365-374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, M. D., Lamey, A. V., & Douglas, L. (1999). A new dynamic systems method for the analysis of early socioemotional development. Developmental Science, 2, 458-476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, G. R., DeGarmo, D., & Forgatch, M. S. (2004). Systematic changes in families following prevention trials. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 32, 621-633.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L. B. (1995). Self-organizing processes in learning to learn words: Development is not induction. In C. A. Nelson (Ed.), New perspectives on learning and development: Minnesota symposia on child psychology (Vol.28, pp. 1–32). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, J., Prichard, J., Schrepferman, L., & Patrick, M. R. (2004). Child impulsiveness-inattention, early peer experiences, and the Development of early onset conduct problems. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 32, 579-594.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stormshak, E. A., Comeau, C. A., & Shepard, S. A. (2004). The relative contribution of sibling deviance and peer deviance in the prediction of substance use across middle childhood. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 32, 635-649.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thelen, E., & Smith, L. B. (1994). A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thelen, E., & Ulrich, B. D. (1991). Hidden skills: A dynamic systems analysis of treadmill stepping during the first year. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 56 (Serial No. 223).

  • Tschacher, W., & Scheier, C. (1997). Complex psychological systems: Synergetics and chaos. In F. Masterpasqua & P. A. Perna (Eds.), The psychological meaning of chaos (pp.273-298). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Maas, H. L. J., & Molenaar, P. C. M. (1992). Stagewise cognitive development: An application of catastrophe theory. Psychological Review, 99, 395-417.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Geert, P. (1991). Adynamic systems model of cognitive and language growth. Psychological Review, 98, 3-53.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Geert, P., & van Dijk, M. (2002). Focus on variability: New tools to study intra-individual variability in developmental data. Infant Behavior and Development, 25, 340-374.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

    Marc D. Lewis

Authors
  1. Marc D. Lewis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marc D. Lewis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lewis, M.D. Trouble Ahead: Predicting Antisocial Trajectories with Dynamic Systems Concepts and Methods. J Abnorm Child Psychol 32, 665–671 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JACP.0000047214.03516.8b

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JACP.0000047214.03516.8b

Search

Navigation