Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Essential Features of Technology and Technology Education: A Conceptual Framework for the Development of OBE (Outcomes Based Education) Related Programmes in Technology Education

  • Published:
International Journal of Technology and Design Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It appears that programme development in technology education is emerging from an atheoretical perspective. This could be attributed to the absence/neglect of conceptual frameworks (philosophical underpinning) in the development of programmes in technology education. This article explores the role of the content dimension of the 'essential features' of technology and technology education in OBE (Outcomes Based Education) related programme development. An instructional programme was developed using criteria derived from the essential features of technology and technology education. In order to gauge learners' experience, in relation to these essential features, a qualitative case study involving 20 learners was undertaken at a College of Education. Engagement with theprogramme proved to be an empowering experience for the learners who had hitherto not had the opportunity to experience a formal programme in technology education. Although it could not be proved conclusively that cognitive development had occurred, positive inter-dependence,shared responsibility, social skills and enhanced learning were evident. The study has shown that criteria derived from the 'essential features' of technology and technology education could serve as a reliable yardstick to measure the extent of learning in relation to these essential features

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Ankiewicz, P., Myburg, C. P. H., van Rensburg, S. J.: 2001, ‘Assessing the Attitudinal Technology Profile of South African Learners: A Pilot Study’, International Journal of Technology and Design Education 11, 93–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, M.: 1994, ‘Designing the Future? Technology, Values and Choice’, International Journal of Technology and Design Education 4(1), 51–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biehler, R. F. & Snowman, J.: 1993, Psychology Applied to Teaching, Houghton Mifflin, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burges, R. G. (ed.): 1988, Strategies of Educational Research, The Falmer Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coetsee, L. D.: 1992, in J. Kroon & P. L. Moolman (eds.), Psychological Characteristics of Entrepreneurs, Central Publications, Potchefstroom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W.: 1994, Research Design. Qualitative and Quantitative Approach, Sage Publications, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeLuca, V. W.: 1992, ‘Survey of Technology Education. Problem-solving Activities’, The Technology Teacher 51(5), 26–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. K.: 1988, in J. P. Keeves (ed.), Educational Research, Methodology and Measurement: An International Yearbook, Pergamon Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education: 1996, Curriculum Framework for General Education and Training, Pretoria.

  • Department of Education: 1997, Senior Phase (Grades 7 to 9) Policy Document, Pretoria.

  • De Swardt, A. E.: 1998, Technology Education and the Development of Thinking Skills: A Case Study, M.Ed. Mini-dissertation, Rand Afrikaans University, Johannesburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, E.: 1996, Essential Features of Technology Education, PATT (South Africa) Conference Proceedings, 36-38, 14-17 October 1996.

  • Gauteng Department of Education (GDE) and Gauteng Institute of Curriculum Development (GICD): 1999, Technology Progress Maps, 5-6, Johannesburg.

  • Givens, N. & Barlex, D.: 2001, ‘The Role of Published Materials in Curriculum Development and Implementation for Secondary School Design and Technology in England and Wales’, International Journal of Technology and Design Education 11, 137–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glover, P.: 1996, What Are the Inescapable Features of Technology Education and What Do They Tell Us about the Development of a Technology Education Curriculum?, PATT (South Africa) Conference Proceedings, 12-15, 14-17 October 1996.

  • Henak, D. A.: 1992, ‘Enhancing Motivation with Experiential Learning’, in G. A. Edminson 1995 (ed.), Delivery Systems: Instructional Strategies for Technology Education, Reston, International Technology Education Association (ITEA).

  • Hammer, D.: 1997, ‘Discovery Learning and Discovery Teaching’, Cognition and Instruction 15(4), 485–529.

    Google Scholar 

  • HEDCOM (Heads of Education Departments Committee): 1996, Draft National Framework for Curriculum Development in Technology Education, A report by the Technology 2005 Project Committee, Pretoria.

  • HEDCOM (Heads of Education Departments Committee): 1997, Technology 2005 Project: Curriculum Framework for Teacher Education, Pretoria.

  • ITEA (International Technology Education Association): 2000, Standards for Technological Literacy: Content for the Study of Technology, Reston, VA.

  • Johnson, S. D.: 1997, ‘Learning Technological Concepts and Developing Intellectual Skills’, International Journal of Technology and Design Education 7(3), 161–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S. D. & Thomas, R.: 1992, ‘Technology Education and the Cognitive Revolution’, The Technology Teacher 51(4), 7–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Y. S. & Guba, E. G.: 1985, Naturalistic Inquiry, SAGE Publishers, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCormick, R.: 1997 ‘Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge’, International Journal of Technology and Design Education 7(1-2), 141–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCormick, R., Murphy, P. & Hennessy, S.: 1994, ‘Problem-solving Processes in Technology Education: A Pilot Study’, International Journal of Technology and Design Education 4(1), 5–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merriam, S. B.: 1988, Case Study Research in Education. A Qualitative Approach, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreland, J & Jones, A.: 2000, ‘Emerging Assessment Practices in the Emergent Curriculum: Implications for Technology’, International Journal of Technology and Design Education 10(3), 283–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlich, D. C., Harder, R. J., Callahan, R. C., Kauchak, D. P. & Gibson, H. W.: 1994, Teaching Strategies. A Guide to Better Instruction, Fourth Edition, D. C. Heath and Company, Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, K.: 2001, The Education of Pre-service Teachers in Technology Education, D.Ed. Thesis, Rand Afrikaans University, Johannesburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe, D. B.: 1996, ‘Out with the Old, in with the New’, Journal of Design and Technology Education 1(1), 24–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swart, N. J.: 1992, ‘Opportunities’, in J. Kroon & P. L. Moolman (eds.), Entrepreneurship, Central Publications, Potchefstroom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Technology 2005: 1996, The HEDCOM Technology Education Project, Discussion Document, Pretoria.

  • Tesch, R.: 1990, Qualitative Research: Analysis Types and Soft-ware Tools, Falmer Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Rensburg, S. & Ankiewicz, P.: 1999, ‘Assessing South African Learners' Attitudes towards Technology by using the PATT (Pupils' Attitudes Towards Technology) Questionnaire’, International Journal of Technology and Design Education 9, 137–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waks, L. J.: 1994, ‘Value Judgement and Social Action in Technology Studies’, International Journal of Technology and Design Education 4(1), 35–50.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Curriculum Studies, Rand Afrikaans University (RAU), P.O. Box 524, Auckland Park 2006, Johannesburg, South Africa

    Vassy Reddy

  2. Department of Curriculum Studies, Rand Afrikaans University (RAU), P.O. Box 524, Auckland Park 2006, Johannesburg, South Africa. E-mail:

    Piet Ankiewicz

  3. Department of Curriculum Studies, Rand Afrikaans University (RAU), P.O. Box 524, Auckland Park 2006, Johannesburg, South Africa. E-mail:

    Estelle de Swardt

  4. Department of Curriculum Studies, Rand Afrikaans University (RAU), P.O. Box 524, Auckland Park 2006, Johannesburg, South Africa. E-mail:

    Elna Gross

Authors
  1. Vassy Reddy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Piet Ankiewicz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Estelle de Swardt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Elna Gross
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reddy, V., Ankiewicz, P., de Swardt, E. et al. The Essential Features of Technology and Technology Education: A Conceptual Framework for the Development of OBE (Outcomes Based Education) Related Programmes in Technology Education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education 13, 27–45 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ITDE.0000039568.05480.c3

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ITDE.0000039568.05480.c3

Search

Navigation