Economic Effects of Taxing Different Organizational Forms under the Nordic Dual Income Tax
- 251 Downloads
This paper analyzes the economic effects of income splitting rules for closely held corporations and sole proprietorships/partnerships under the Nordic dual income tax. Income is split by imputing a return to capital, but the methods used for this differ between the Nordic countries. With a few notable exceptions, income splitting does well in the sense that the cost of capital is approximately the same in closely and widely held corporations. The special tax rules for sole proprietorships/partnerships manage to neutralize the impact of the high labor income tax on the cost of capital.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Auerbach, A. J. (1979). “Share Valuation and Corporate Equity Policy,” Journal of Public Economics 11(3), 291–305.Google Scholar
- Fuest, C. and A. J. Weichenrieder. (2002). “Tax Competition and Profit Shifting,” Ifo Studien 4, 611–632.Google Scholar
- Gordon, R. H. and J. Slemrod. (1998). “Are ‘Real’ Responses to Taxes Simply Income Shifting Between Corporate and Personal Tax Bases?” National Bureau of Economic Research WP 6576.Google Scholar
- Hagen, K. P. and P. B. Sørensen. (1998). “Taxation of Income from Small Businesses: Taxation Principles and Tax Reforms in the Nordic Countries.” In P. B. Sørensen (ed.), Tax Policy in the Nordic Countries. London: Macmillan Press Ltd.Google Scholar
- Kari, S. (1999). “Dynamic Behaviour of the Firm Under Dual Income Taxation,” Helsinki School of Economics and Business Administration.Google Scholar
- Lindhe, T., J. Södersten and A. Öberg (2002). “Economic Effects of Taxing Closed Corporations Under a Dual Income Tax,” Ifo Studien 4, 575–609.Google Scholar
- Sinn, H.-W. (1987). Capital Income Taxation and Resource Allocation, North-Holland.Google Scholar