Skip to main content

A Comparison of Bayesian and Belief Function Reasoning

Abstract

The goal of this paper is to compare the similarities and differences between Bayesian and belief function reasoning. Our main conclusion is that although there are obvious differences in semantics, representations, and the rules for combining and marginalizing representations, there are many similarities. We claim that the two calculi have roughly the same expressive power. Each calculus has its own semantics that allow us to construct models suited for these semantics. Once we have a model in either calculus, one can transform it to the other by means of a suitable transformation.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Bogler PL. Shafer-Dempster reasoning with applications to multisensor target identification systems. IEEE Transactions on System, Man, and Cybernetics 1987;SMC-17(6):968-977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black PK, Laskey KB. Hierarchical evidence and belief functions. In: Shachter RD, Levitt TS, Lemmer JF, Kanal LF eds. Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, 1990;4:207-215.

  • Cobb BR, Shenoy PP. On transforming belief function models to probability models. Working Paper No. 293, University of Kansas School of Business, Lawrence, KS, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawid AP. Conditional independence in statistical theory (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, 1979;41(1):1-31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dempster AP. New methods of reasoning toward posterior distributions based on sample data. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1966;37:355-374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D, Prade H. The principle of minimum specificity as a basis for evidential reasoning. In: Bouchon B, Yager RR eds. Uncertainty in Knowledge-Based Systems, Lecture Notes in Computer Science No. 286, 1986:75-84.

  • Ellsberg D. Risk, ambiguity and the Savage axioms. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1961;75(4):643-669.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffray JY. Linear utility theory for belief functions. O. R. Letters 1989;8:107-112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen FV, Lauritzen SL, Olesen KG. Bayesian updating in causal probabilistic networks by local computation. Computational Statistics Quarterly, 1990;4:269-282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauritzen SL, Dawid AP, Larsen BN, Leimer HG. Independence properties of directed Markov fields. Networks, 1990;20(5):491-505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauritzen SL, Spiegelhalter DJ. Local computation with probabilities on graphical structures and their application to expert systems (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, 1988;20(5):157-224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearl J. Fusion, propagation, and structuring in belief networks. Artificial Intelligence, 1986;29:241-288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearl J. Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage LJ. The Foundation of Statistics. New York, NY: JohnWiley & Sons, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafer G. A Mathematical Theory of Evidence. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafer G. Belief functions and parametric models (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, 1982;44(3):322-352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafer G. The combination of evidence. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 1986;1:155-179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafer G, Srivastava R. The Bayesian and belief-function formalisms: A general perspective for auditing. In: Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory (1990). Reprinted in Pearl J, Shafer G, eds. Readings in Uncertain Reasoning. n Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann, 1990:482-521.

  • Shenoy PP. Valuation-based systems: A framework for managing uncertainty in expert systems. In: Zadeh LA, Kacprzyk J, eds. Fuzzy Logic for the Management of Uncertainty, NewYork: Wiley, 1992:83-104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shenoy PP. Conditional independence in valuation-based systems. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 1994a;10(3):203-234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shenoy PP. Representing Conditional Independence Relations by Valuation Networks. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 1994b;2(2):143-165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shenoy PP, Shafer G. Axioms for probability and belief function propagation. In: Shachter RD, Levitt TS, Lemmer JF, Kanal LF, eds. Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, 1990;4:169-198. Reprinted in Pearl J, Shafer G, eds. Readings in Uncertain Reasoning. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann 1990:575-610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smets P. Un modéle mathématico-statistique stimulant le processus du diagnostic médical. Doctoral dissertation, Universit´e Libre de Bruxelles, 1978.

  • Smets P. Belief functions: The disjunctive rule of combination and the generalized Bayesian theorem. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 1993a;9:1-35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiegelhalter DJ, Dawid AP, Lauritzen SL, Cowell RG. Bayesian analysis in expert systems. Statistical Science, 1993;8(3):219-283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava RP. Audit decisions using belief functions:Areview. Control and Cybernetics, 1997;26(2):135-160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strat, TM. Decision analysis using belief functions. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 1990;4:391-418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zarley DK, Hsia YT, Shafer G. Evidential reasoning using DELIEF. In: Proceedings of the Seventh National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 1988;1:205-209.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cobb, B.R., Shenoy, P.P. A Comparison of Bayesian and Belief Function Reasoning. Information Systems Frontiers 5, 345–358 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ISFI.0000005650.63806.03

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ISFI.0000005650.63806.03

  • Bayesian networks
  • Dempster-Shafer belief functions
  • valuation-based systems