Abstract
The Government of Egypt is mandated toplan, construct, operate, manage, andmaintain the water system. However, withthe growing water demands over supplies inthe country, water management became a verydifficult task. This has led Egypt toreform policies, technologies,institutions, and development strategies tomanage water more effectively. One of thesestrategies is the irrigation managementtransfer (IMT) that has been a majorstrategy adopted to encourage farmers toplay a more important role in irrigationmanagement and related water services andalso share the cost of O&M of irrigationand drainage systems. IMT policy islaunched in Egypt as a pilot phase toexpand water users' participation atsecondary levels of the irrigation anddrainage systems. Four pilot areas (5,000–8,000 acre) representing all categories andgeographical locations of agriculturallands of Egypt were selected to implementthis policy.
This study was conducted in these pilotareas prior to the start of any IMTactivities to describe, analyze, andexplain farmers' attitudes towardirrigation maintenance and implementationof IMT process. Socio-economicquestionnaires were designed and used asthe main tool for data collection. Afterthe field pre-test of the surveyinstrument, a sample of 240 farmers, 60from each pilot area, was selected usingthe sampling frame of multi-tiered process,and the statistical data analysis was doneusing SpssWin software.
The major result of this study is that,without proper education and interface withfarmers, there is widespread resistance tothe idea farmers assuming management andmaintenance responsibilities beyond theon-farm level. It would have to proceedvery cautiously, and yield responsiveresults if it were to survive in the faceof the attitudes the farmers have shown,with their strong belief in the necessityof the role of the government. Meanwhile,farmers expressed great confidence in theIMT process and its objectives.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.References
APRP. 1998. Egypt's irrigation improvement program, performance assessment, Report No. 7.
APRP. 2001. MWRI Policy on Irrigation Management Transfer. Report No. 47, Main Document.
Cagil, M. 1995. Gradual and intensive transfer program of irrigation management to users, Turkish experience. Bangkok: FAO/IWMI Expert Consultation on Irrigation Management Transfer, 25-29 September 1995.
FAO. 1999. Transfer of irrigation management services guidelines. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 58, Rome.
Johnson III, S.H. 1999. Changing the guard in Mexico: Transferring irrigation management to water user associations. 17th International Commission of Irrigation and Drainage, Granada, Spain, pp 213-226.
Maurya, P.R. 1993. Partial turnover of management of Nigerian large scale irrigation project to farmers: Constraints and solutions. 15thCongress of ICID, The Hague, The Netherlands, pp 51-65.
Miskovsky, J. and Runstuk, K. 1999. Privatisation of irrigation systems in the Czech Republic. 17th International Commission of Irrigation and Drainage, Granada, Spain, pp 143-153.
National Survey 2001. Knowledge, attitudes and practices of Egyptian farmers towards water resources, EPIQ, Agricultural Policy Reform Project, Report No. 54.
Moustafa, M. and Cardinalli, R. 2002. Irrigation management transfer in Egypt. The 18th ICID Congress, Q51, July 21-28, 2002, Montreal, Canada.
Navalawala, B.N. 1993. Indian experience in irrigation management and farmers' participation. 15thCongress of ICID, The Hague, The Netherlands, pp 181-200.
Nelson, D.E. 1999. The role of the irrigation system manager in maintenance and modernization. 17th International Commission of Irrigation and Drainage, Granada, Spain, pp 227-237.
Sahin, L. 1993. Farmers and governmental organizations involved in irrigation in Turkey. 15thCongress of ICID, The Hague, The Netherlands, pp 43-50.
Samad, M. and Smidt, P. 1999. Management transfer in irrigation systems in Asia: A review of selected country experiences. 17th International Commission of Irrigation and Drainage, Granada, Spain, pp 177-196.
Svendsen, M. and Gladys, N. 1999. Irrigation Management Transfer in Turkey: Process and outcomes, EDI Participatory Irrigation Management Case Studies Series.
Valdes, C.O.R., Pimentel, L.R., De Leon, E.E., Spinola, J.A., Arvizu, I.G. and Capiterucho, A.D. 1999. Users in modernization of Mexico's irrigation districts. 17th International Commission of Irrigation and Drainage, Granada, Spain, pp 237-247.
Vermillion, D.L. and Garces-Restrepo, C. 1998. Impacts of Colombia's current irrigation management transfer program, Research Report 25, InternationalWaterManagement Institute, Colombo, Sri Lanka, p 38.
Wijedasa, H.A. 1999. Irrigation management by beneficiers: A Sri Lanka experience. 17th International Commission of Irrigation and Drainage, Granada, Spain, pp 167-176.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Moustafa, M.M. Can Farmers in Egypt Shoulder the Burden of Irrigation Management?. Irrigation and Drainage Systems 18, 109–125 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:IRRI.0000040249.12754.c8
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:IRRI.0000040249.12754.c8