Religion, Dialogue, and Non-Violent Actions in Palestinian-Israeli Conflict

  • Mohammed Abu-Nimer
Article

Abstract

This article examines the potential constructive role that religious peace builders can play in contributing to Palestinian-Israeli reconciliation and peace. An interfaith setting is a space in which believers from various faith groups come together to explore not only their similarities and differences, but also how they can promote peace in the harsh reality of violence. In such encounters, there is a wide range of interfaith dialogue activities and possibilities that can be deployed. Based on applied training and interfaith dialogue workshops and experiences, this article proposes a framework for conducting interfaith dialogue among Muslims, Christians, and Jews in Palestine and Israel.

Interfaith dialogue reconciliation nonviolence religiocentrism religiorelativism religion and peace process Rabbis for Human Rights 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Abu-Amr, Ziad. 1994. Islamic Fundamentalism in the West Bank and Gaza: Muslim Brotherhood and Islamic Jihad. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Abu-Nimer, Mohammed. 1999. Dialogue, Conflict Resolution and Change: Arab–Jewish Encounters in Israel. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  3. Abu-Nimer, Mohammed. 2001 “Conflict Resolution and Religion: Toward a Training Model of Interreligious Peacebuilding.” Journal of Peace Research 38(6): 685–704.Google Scholar
  4. Abu-Nimer, Mohammed. 2002. “The Miracles of Transformation Through Interfaith Dialogue: Are You a Believer?” pp. 15–32 in David Smock, ed., Interfaith Dialogue and Peacebuilding. Washington, DC: USIP.Google Scholar
  5. Abu-Nimer, Mohammed. 2003. Nonviolence and Peacebuilding in Islamic Communities. Gainesville: University Press of Florida.Google Scholar
  6. Appleby, Scott. 1998. The Ambivalence of the Sacred: Religion, Violence, and Reconciliation. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  7. Arian, Asher, and Michal Shamir, eds. 1999. The Elections in Israel. Albany: State University of New York Press (with Israel Democracy Institute).Google Scholar
  8. Bennett, Milton. 1993. “Towards Ethnorelativism: A Developmental Model of Intercultural Sensitivity.” pp. 21–71 in Michael Paige, ed., Cross Cultural Orientation: New Conceptualization and Applications. New York: University Press of America.Google Scholar
  9. Diamond, Louise, and John McDonald, eds. 1996. Multi-Track Diplomacy: A Systems Approach to Peace. West Hartford, CT: Kumarian Press.Google Scholar
  10. Gopin, Marc. 2000. Between Eden and Armageddon: The Future of World Religions, Violence, and Peacemaking. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Hroub, Khaled. 2000. Hamas: Political Thought and Practice. Washington, DC: Institute for Palestine Studies.Google Scholar
  12. Johnston, Douglas, and Cynthia Sampson, eds. 1994. Religion: The Missing Dimension of Statecraft. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Kasimow, Harold, and Sherwin Byron. 1991. No Religion Is an Island: Abraham Joshua Heschel and Interreligious Dialogue. New York: Maryknoll.Google Scholar
  14. Kimball, Charles. 2002. When Religion Becomes Evil. San Francisco: Harper.Google Scholar
  15. Kimmerling, Baruch. 2001. The Invention and Decline of Israeliness: State, Society, and the Military. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  16. Kimmerling, Baruch, and Joel S. Migdal. 2003. The Palestinian People: A History. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Landau, Yehezkel. 2003. Healing the Holy Land: Religious Peacebuilding in Israel Palestine. Washington, DC: Peaceworks Series of United States Institute of Peace (USIP).Google Scholar
  18. Masters, Bruce. 2001. Christians and Jews in the Ottoman Arab World: The Roots of Sectarianism. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Volkan, Vamik. 1997. Bloodlines: From Ethnic Pride to Ethnic Terrorism. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
  20. Volkan, Vamik, and Norman Itzkowitz. 1994. Turks and Greeks: Neighbours in Conflict. Huntingdon: Eothen Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mohammed Abu-Nimer
    • 1
  1. 1.School of International Service, International Peace and Conflict Resolution ProgramAmerican University

Personalised recommendations