, Volume 527, Issue 1, pp 99–112 | Cite as

Resistance and Resilience of Macroinvertebrate Assemblages to Drying and Flood in a Tallgrass Prairie Stream System

  • Ken M. Fritz
  • Walter K. Dodds


Intermittent streams are common worldwide, and the ability of invertebrates to recover from floods and drought is a key feature of communities from these highly disturbed ecosystems. The macroinvertebrate assemblages of Kings Creek in northeastern Kansas were sampled regularly from four intermittent and two perennial sites over 2 years (1995–1996) to investigate the response and recovery to seasonal drying and floods. A ≈9mo drying period reduced taxa richness and density to 14% and 3% of pre-drying assemblages, respectively, in 1995–1996, whereas a 2mo drying period reduced richness by half and density to 4% of pre-drying assemblages in 1996. Floods at intermittent sites reduced densities and richness by 95% and ≈50%, respectively. A >50 y-flood reduced macroinvertebrate richness by 97% and density by >99% at a downstream perennial site. Resistance and resilience of total macroinvertebrate density was typically greater to floods than to drying, whereas resilience of taxa richness did not differ between disturbance types. The time required for recovery to pre-flood conditions (richness and density) was half as long (27 vs. 76 day) for intermittent sites compared to perennial sites. Colonization of intermittent sites was a function of distance from upstream refugia. Floods were a more important disturbance on assemblages in a downstream reach as compared to upstream reaches. In contrast, upstream reaches were more likely to dry. Recovery following flood and drought was dominated by colonization as opposed to tolerance, thus resilience is more important than resistance in regulating macroinvertebrate communities in these streams, and relative position in the landscape affects disturbance type, intensity, and ability of communities to recover from disturbance.

intermittent streams prairie streams macroinvertebrates disturbance floods drying 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anderson, N. H. & D. M. Lehmkuhl,1968.Catastrophic drift of insects in a woodland stream.Ecology 49:198–206.Google Scholar
  2. Angradi, T. R.,1997.Hydrologic context and macroinverte-brate community response to floods in an Appalachian headwater stream.American Midland Naturalist 138:371–386.Google Scholar
  3. Borchardt, D.,1993.Effects of flow and refugia on drift loss of benthic macroinvertebrates:implications for habitat restoration in lowland streams.Freshwater Biology 29:221–227.Google Scholar
  4. Boulton, A. J.,1989.Over-summering strategies of aquatic macroinvertebrates in two intermittent streams in central Victoria.Transactions of the Royal Society of South Australia 113:23–34.Google Scholar
  5. Boulton, A. J. & P. S. Lake,1992a.The ecology of two inter-mittent streams in Victoria,Australia. II. Comparisons of faunal composition between habitats,rivers and years.Freshwater Biology 27:99–121.Google Scholar
  6. Boulton, A. J. & P. S. Lake,1992b.The ecology of two inter-mittent streams in Victoria,Australia. III. Temporal changes in faunal composition.Freshwater Biology 27:123–138.Google Scholar
  7. Boulton, A. J. & P. J. Suter,1986.Ecology of temporary streams-an Australian perspective. In de Deckker, P. & W. D. Williams (eds),Limnology in Australia.Dr W.Junk Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands:313–327.Google Scholar
  8. Chessman, B. C. & D. P. Robinson,1987.Some Effects of the 1982-1983 drought on water quality and macroinvertebrate fauna in the lower LaTrobe River,Victoria.Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 38:289–299.Google Scholar
  9. Clinton, S. M.,N. B. Grimm & S. G. Fisher,1996.Response of a hyporheic invertebrate assemblage to drying disturbance in a desert stream.Journal of the North American Benthological Society 15:700–712.Google Scholar
  10. Covich, A. P.,S. C. Fritz, P. J. Lamb, R. D. Marzolf, W. J. Matthews, K. A. Poiani, E. E. Prepas, M. B. Richman & T. C. Winter,1997.Potential Effects of climate changes on aquatic ecosystems of the Great Plains of North America.Hydrological Processes 11:993–1021.Google Scholar
  11. Death, R. G.,1996.Predicting the impacts of biological and physical disturbances:does theoretical ecology hold any answers?New Zealand Journal of Ecology 20:17–26.Google Scholar
  12. Dieterich, M. & N. H. Anderson,1995.Life cycles and food habits of mayflies and stoneflies from temporary streams in western Oregon. Freshwater Biology 34:47–60.Google Scholar
  13. Delucchi, C. M.,1988.Comparison of community structure among streams with different temporal flow regimes.Canadian Journal of Zoology 66:579–586.Google Scholar
  14. Delucchi, C. M.,1989.Movement patterns of invertebrates in temporary and permanent streams.Oecologia 78:199–207.Google Scholar
  15. Denslow, J. S.,1980.Patterns of plant species diversity during succession under different disturbance regimes.Oecologia 46:18–21.Google Scholar
  16. Dodds, W. K.,1997.Distribution of runo.and rivers related to vegetative characteristics,latitude,and slope: a global perspective.Journal of the North American Benthological Society16:162–168.Google Scholar
  17. Dodds W. K., Hutson, A. C., Evans, M. A., Gudder, D. A., Fritz, K. M. Gray, L.,1996.The relationship of floods, drying,flow and light to primary production and producer biomass in a prairie stream.Hydrobiologia333:151–169.Google Scholar
  18. Elliot, J. M.,1971.Some methods for the statistical analysis of samples of benthic invertebrates.Freshwater Biological Association Scienti c Publication No.25, 148 p.Google Scholar
  19. Extence, C. A.,1981.The effect of drought on benthic inver-tebrate communities in a lowland river.Hydrobiologia 83: 217–224.Google Scholar
  20. Feminella, J. W.,1996.Comparison of benthic macroinverte-brate assemblages in small streams along a gradient of flow permanence.Journal of the North American Benthological Society 15:651–669.Google Scholar
  21. Fritz, K. M.,1997.The Effects of natural disturbances on lotic fauna of a pristine tallgrass prairie stream.M.S.Thesis, Kansas State University.Google Scholar
  22. Fritz, K. M. & W. K. Dodds,2002.Macroinvertebrate assemblage structure across a tallgrass prairie stream land-scape.Archiv fü r Hydrobiologie 154:79–102.Google Scholar
  23. Gray, L. J.,1989.Emergence,production and export of aquatic insects from a tallgrass prairie stream.Southwestern Naturalist 34:313–318.Google Scholar
  24. Gray, L. J. & W. K. Dodds,1998.Structure and dynamics of aquatic communities.In Knapp, A. K., Briggs, J. M., Hartnett, D. C. andS. Collins (eds),Grassland Dynamics: Long Term Ecological Research in Tallgrass Prairie.Oxford University Press, New York,NY:177–189.Google Scholar
  25. Gray, L. J.,G. L. Macpherson, J. K. Koelliker & W. K. Dodds, 1998.Hydrology and aquatic chemistry.In Knapp, A. K., Briggs, J. M., Hartnett, D. C.andS. Collins (eds),Grassland Dynamics:Long Term Ecological Research in Tallgrass Prairie.Oxford University Press, New York,NY:159–176.Google Scholar
  26. Grimm, N. B. & S. G. Fisher,1989.Stability of periphyton and macroinvertebrates to disturbance by flash floods in a desert stream.Journal of the North American Benthological Society 8:293–307.Google Scholar
  27. Imhof, J. G. A. & A. D. Harrison,1981.Survival of Diplectrona modesta Banks (Trichoptera:Hydropsychidae)during short periods of desiccation.Hydrobiologia 77:61–63.Google Scholar
  28. Jewell, M. E.,1927.Aquatic biology of the prairie.Ecology.8: 289–298.Google Scholar
  29. Johnson, S. L., & C. C. Vaughn,1995.A hierarchical study of macroinvertebrate recolonization of disturbed patches along a longitudinal gradient in a prairie river.Freshwater Biology 34:531–540.Google Scholar
  30. Lake, P. S.,2000.Disturbance,patchiness,and diversity in streams.Journal of the North American Benthological Society 19:573–592.Google Scholar
  31. Lake, P. S.,T. J. Doeg & R. Marchant,1989.Effects of multiple disturbance on macroinvertebrate communities in the Acheron River,Victoria.Australian Journal of Ecology 14:507–514.Google Scholar
  32. Langton, P. H. & J. Casas,1999.Changes in chironomid assemblage composition in two Mediterranean mountain streams over a period of extreme hydrological conditions.Hydrobiologia 390:37–49.Google Scholar
  33. MacArthur, R. H. & E. O. Wilson,1967.The Theory of Island Biogeography.Princeton University Press, Princeton,NJ, 203 p.Google Scholar
  34. Mackay, R. J.,1992.Colonization by lotic macroinvertebrates: A review of processes and patterns.Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 49:617–628.Google Scholar
  35. Matthews, W. J.,1988.North American prairie streams as systems for ecological study.Journal of the North American Benthological Society 7:387–409.Google Scholar
  36. Matthews, W. J. & E. G. Zimmerman,1990.Potential Effects of global warming on native shes of the southwestern Great Plains and the southwest.Fisheries 15:26–32.Google Scholar
  37. Merrit, R. W.,K. W. Cummins & V. H. Resh,1996.Design of aquatic insect studies:Collecting,sampling and rearing 111.procedures.In Merritt, R. W. & K. W. Cummins (eds),An Introduction to the Aquatic Insects of North America,3rd edn.Kendall/Hunt, Dubuque,IA.Google Scholar
  38. Meyer, A. & E. I. Meyer,2000.Discharge regime and the effect of drying on macroinvertebrate communities in a temporary karst stream in East Westphalia (Germany).Aquatic Sciences62:216–231.Google Scholar
  39. Miller, A. M. & S. W. Golladay,1996.Effects of spates and drying on macroinvertebrate assemblages of an intermittent and a perennial prairie stream.Journal of the North American Benthological Society 15:670–689.Google Scholar
  40. Ott, R. L.,1993.An Introduction to Statistical Methods and Data Analysis.Duxbury Press, Belmont,CA,1051 p.Google Scholar
  41. Paltridge, R. M.,P. L. Dostine, C. L. Humphrey & A. J. Boulton,1997.Macroinvertebrate recolonization after re-wetting of a tropical seasonally-flowing stream (Magela Creek,Northern Territory,Australia).Marine and Fresh-water Research 48:633–645.Google Scholar
  42. Peckarsky, B. L.,1983.Biotic interactions or abiotic limita-tions?A model of lotic community structure.In Fontaine, T. D.andS. M. Bartell (eds),Dynamics of Lotic Ecosystems.Ann Arbor Science, Ann Arbor,MI:303–323.Google Scholar
  43. Poff, N. L.,1992.Why disturbances can be predictable:a per-spective on the definition of disturbance in streams.Journal of the North American Benthological Society 11:86–92.Google Scholar
  44. Poff, N. L. & J. V. Ward,1989.Implications of stream flow variability and predictability for lotic community structure:a regional analysis of stream flow patterns.Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 46:1805–1818.Google Scholar
  45. Reice, S. R.,R. C. Wissmar & R. J. Naiman,1990.Disturbance regimes,resilience,and recovery of animal communities and habitats in lotic ecosystems.Environmental Management 14: 647–659.Google Scholar
  46. Resh, V. H.,A. V. Brown, A. P. Covich, M. E. Gurtz, H. W. Li, G. W. Minshall, S. R. Reice, A. L. Sheldon, J. B. Wallace & R. C. Wissmar,1988.The role of disturbance in stream ecology.Journal of the North American Benthological Society 7:433–455.Google Scholar
  47. Robinson, C. T.,G. W. Minshall, L. V. Every,1993.Seasonal trends and colonization patterns of macroinvertebrate assemblages in two streams with contrasting flow regimes.Great Basin Naturalist 53:321–331.Google Scholar
  48. Ross, H. H.,1963.Stream communities and terrestrial biomes.Archiv fü r Hydrobiologie 59:235–242.Google Scholar
  49. Rosario, R. B. & V. H. Resh,2000.Invertebrates in intermittent and perennial streams:is the hyporheic zone a refuge from drying?Journal of the North American Benthological Society 19:680–696.Google Scholar
  50. SAS Institute Inc.,2001. SAS /STAT Software:Changes and Enhancement.Cary, NC.Google Scholar
  51. Slobodkin, L. B. & H. L. Sanders,1969 On the contribution of environmental predictability to species diversity.Brookhaven Symposium on Biology 22:82–95.Google Scholar
  52. Smock, L. A.,L. C. Smith, J. B. Jones,Jr. & S. M. Hooper, 1994.Effects of drought and a hurricane on a coastal headwater stream.Archiv fü r Hydrobiologie 131:25–38.Google Scholar
  53. Southwood, T. R. E.,1977.Habitat,the templet for ecological strategies?Journal of Animal Ecology 46:337–365.Google Scholar
  54. Stagliano, D. M. & M. R. Whiles,2002.Macroinvertebrate production and trophic structure in a tallgrass prairie headwater stream.Journal of the North American Benthological Society 21:97–113.Google Scholar
  55. Stanley, E. H. & S. G. Fisher,1992.Intermittency,disturbance, and stability in stream ecosystems.In Robarts, R. D. & M. L. Bothwell (eds),Aquatic Ecosystems in Semi-arid Regions: Implications for Resource Management.N. H. R. I. Symposium Series 7,Environment Canada,Saskatoon, Saskatchewan,Canada.Google Scholar
  56. Stanley, E. H.,D. L. Buschman, A. J. Boulton, N. B. Grimm & S. G. Fisher,1994.Invertebrate resistance and resilience to intermittency in a desert stream.American Midland Naturalist 131:288–300.Google Scholar
  57. Townsend, C. R. & A. G. Hildrew,1994.Species traits in relation to a habitat templet for river systems.Freshwater Biology 31:265–275.Google Scholar
  58. Ward, D. & L. Blaustein,1994.The overriding in.uence of.ash.oods on species-area curves in ephemeral Negev Desert pools:a consideration of the value of island biogeography theory.Journal of Biogeography21:595–603.Google Scholar
  59. Whitman, R. L.,J. M. Inglis, W. J. Clark & R. W. Clary,1983.An inexpensive and simple elutriation device for separation of invertebrates from sand and gravel.Freshwater Invertebrate Biology 2:159–163.Google Scholar
  60. Wiggins, G. B.,R. J. Mackay & I. M. Smith,1980.Evolutionary and ecological strategies of animals in annual temporary pools.Archiv fü r Hydrobiologie Suppl.58:97–206.Google Scholar
  61. Williams, D. D.,1996.Environmental constraints in temporary fresh waters and their consequences for the insect fauna.Journal of the North American Benthological Society 15: 634–650.Google Scholar
  62. Williams, D. D.,1998.The role of dormancy in the evolution and structure of temporary water invertebrate communities.Archiv fü r Hydrobiologie Special Issues Advances in Limnology 52:109–124.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ken M. Fritz
    • 1
    • 2
  • Walter K. Dodds
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Biology, Ackert HallKansas State UniversityManhattanUSA
  2. 2.National Exposure Research LaboratoryU.S. Environmental Protection AgencyCincinnatiUSA (Tel.:

Personalised recommendations