Skip to main content
Log in

Linkages among land-use, water quality, physical habitat conditions and lotic diatom assemblages: A multi-spatial scale assessment

  • Published:
Hydrobiologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We assessed the importance of spatial scales (catchment, stream network, and sample reach) on the effects of agricultural land-use on lotic diatom assemblages along a land-use gradient in the agricultural Willamette Valley Ecoregion of Oregon. Periphyton, water chemistry, and physical habitat conditions were characterized for 25 wadeable streams during a dry season (July to September, 1997). Additional water chemistry samples were collected in the following wet season (February 1998) to assess seasonal effects of land-use on stream water chemistry. Percent agricultural land-use in the study catchments ranged from 10% to 89% with an average of 52%. Partial canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) with the first axis constrained by % agricultural land-use showed that % agricultural land-use at 3 spatial scales explained between 3.7%–6.3% of variability in the diatom species dataset. Monte Carlo Permutation tests indicated that the variance explained by % agricultural land-use was only significant at the spatial scale of the stream network with 10- and 30-m band width (p<0.05, 999 permutations). In addition to the effects of % agricultural land-use, partial CCAs with a forward selection option showed that water chemistry (e.g., SiO2), reach-scale stream channel dimensions (e.g., width, depth, and slope), reach-scale in-stream habitats (substrates and filamentous algal cover in stream beds), and riparian vegetative buffer were all important with relation to diatom species assemblages. Percent of obligately nitrogen-heterotrophic taxa was the only diatom autecological metric that showed a significant but weak correlation with % agricultural land-use along the stream network (r=0.50), but not at catchment or sample reach scale. Correlation between % agricultural land-use and water chemistry variables varied among the spatial scales and between seasons. Physical habitat variables (log10 erodible substrate diameters and stream reach slope) were significantly correlated with % agricultural land-use along the stream network but not at catchment or sample reach scale. Our data suggest that spatial scales are important in assessing effects of land-use on stream conditions but the spatial scale effects may vary between seasons. Direct linkages between agricultural land-use and lotic diatom assemblages were weak during summer base-flow time regardless of the spatial scales. Summer sampling may underestimate the effects of catchment land-use on stream conditions in areas where seasonal patterns are so distinctive as in the Willamette Valley.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allan, J. D., D. L. Erickson & J. Fay, 1997. Influence of catchment land-use on stream integrity across multiple spatial scales. Freshwater Biology 37: 149–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, T. F. H., S. M. Bartell & J. F. Koonce, 1977. Multiple stable configurations in ordination of phytoplankton community change rates. Ecology 58: 1076–1084.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. R., E. E. Hardy, J. T. Roach & R. E. Witmer, 1976. A land-use and land cover classification system for use with remote sensor data. Professional Paper 964, U.S. Geological Survey, 28 p.

  • Arheimer, B. & R. Liden, 2000. Nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations from agricultural catchments-influence of spatial and temporal variables. Journal of Hydrology 227: 140–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bahls, L. L., 1993. Periphyton Bioassessment Methods for Montana Streams. Water Quality Bureau, Department of Health and Environmental Sciences, Helena, Montana. (Available from: Water Quality Bureau, Department of Health and Environmental Sciences, Room A-206 Cogswell Building, 1400 Broadway, Helena, Montana 59620, U.S.A.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, B. J. F. & R. A. Smith, 2002. Taxonomic richness of stream benthic algae: effects of flood disturbance and nutrients. Limnology and Oceanography 47: 1175–1186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, P. E. & R. N. Lerch, 2000. Watershed vulnerability to losses of agricultural chemicals: interactions of chemistry, hydrology, and land-use. Environmental Science and Technology 34: 3315–3322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolstad, P. V. & W. T. Swank, 1997. Cumulative impacts of landuse on water quality in a southern Appalachian watershed. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 33: 519–533.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonn, B. A., S. R. Hinkle, D. A. Wentz & M. A. Uhrich, 1995. Analysis of nutrient and ancillary water quality data for surface and ground water of the Willamette Basin, Oregon, 1980-90. U.S. Geological Survey, Water-Resources Investigations Report 95-4036. 88 pp.

  • Burkholder, J. M., 1996. Interactions of benthic algae with their substrata. In Stevenson, R. J., M. Bothwell & R. Lowe (eds.), Algal Ecology: Freshwater Benthic Ecosystems. Academic Press, California: 253–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, K. D. & I. R. Waite, 2000. Relations of habitatspecific algal assemblages to land use and water chemistry in the Willamette Basin, Oregon. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 64: 247–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattaneo, A. & M.C. Amireault, 1992. How artificial are artificial substrata for periphyton? Journal of North American Benthological Society 11: 244–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, S. E., D. White & A. L. Schaedel, 1991. Oregon, USA, ecological regions and subregions for water quality management. Environmental Management 15: 847–856.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frissell, C. A., W. J. Liss, C. E. Warren & M. D. Hurley, 1986. A hierarchical framework for stream habitat classification: viewing streams in a watershed context. Environmental Management 10: 199–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonthier, J. B., 1985. Oregon ground-water resources. In U.S. Geological Survey, National Water Summary 1984-Hydrological Events, Selected Water-Quality Trends, and Ground-water Resources. U.S. Geological Survey, Water-Supply Paper 2275: 355–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, J. S., E. F. Benfield, P. V. Bolstad, G. S. Helfman & E. B. D. Jones III, 1998. Stream biodiversity: the ghost of landuse past. Proceedings of National Academy Sciences U.S.A. 95: 14843–14847.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, B. H., 1998. Periphyton. In Lazorchak, J. M., D. J. Klemm & D. V. Peck (eds.), Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program-Surface Waters: Field Operations and Methods for Measuring the Ecological Condition of Wadeable Streams. EPA/620/R-94/004F. US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.: 119–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, L. B., C. Richards, G. E. Host & J. W. Arthur, 1997. Landscape influences on water chemistry in Midwestern stream ecosystems. Freshwater Biology 37: 193–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karr, J.R. & E.W. Chu, 1999. Restoring Life in Running Waters: Better Biological Monitoring. Island Press, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, P. R. & E. G. Robison, 1998. Physical habitat characterization. In Lazorchak, J. M., D. J. Klemm & D. V. Peck (eds), Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program-Surface Waters: Field Operations and Methods for Measuring the Ecological Condition of Wadeable Streams. EPA/620/R-94/004F. US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Washington, D.C.: 77–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, P. R., P. R. Levine, E. G. Robison, C. Seeliger & D. V. Peck, 1999. Quantifying Physical Habitat in Wadeable Streams. EPA/620/R-99/003. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kehmeier, J. W., 2001. A Spatially Explicit Method for Determining the Effects of Watershed Scale Land Use on Stream Conditions. MS thesis, Oregon State University.

  • Kelly, M. G. & B. A. Whitton, 1995. The trophic diatom index: a new index for monitoring eutrophication in rivers. Journal of Applied Phycology 7: 433–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krammer, K. & H. Lange-Bertalot, 1986. Bacillariophyceae, Teil 1. Naviculaceae. VEB Gustav Fisher Verlag, Jena.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krammer, K. & H. Lange-Bertalot, 1988. Bacillariophyceae, Teil 2. Epithemiaceae, Bacillariaceae, Surirellaceae. VEB Gustav Fisher Verlag, Jena.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krammer, K. & H. Lange-Bertalot, 1991a. Bacillariophyceae, Teil 3. Centrales, Fragilariaceae, Eunotiaceae, Achnanthaceae. VEB Gustav Fisher Verlag, Jena.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krammer, K. & H. Lange-Bertalot, 1991b. Bacillariophyceae, Teil 4. Achnanthaceae, Kritische Erganzungen zu Navicula (Lineolatae) und Gomphonema. VEB Gustav Fisher Verlag, Jena.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kutka, F. J. & C. Richards, 1996. Relating diatom assemblage structure to stream habitat quality. Journal of North American Benthological Society 15: 469–480.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lammert, M. & J. D. Allan, 1999. Assessing biotic integrity of streams: effects of scale in measuring the influence of landuse/ cover and habitat structure on fish and macroinvertebrates. Environmental Management 23: 257–270.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lange-Bertalot, H., 1979. Pollution tolerance of diatoms as a criterion for water quality estimation. Nova Hedwigia 64: 285–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leland, H.V., 1995. Distribution of phytobenthos in the Yakima River basin, Washington, in relation to geology, land use, and other environmental factors. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 52: 1108–1129.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFarland, W. D., 1983. A Description of Aquifer Units in Western Oregon. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 82-165, 35 pp.

  • Moser, T. J., D. R. Lindeman, P. J. Wigington, Jr., M. J. Schuft & J. van Sickle, 2000. Methods for multi-spatial scale characterization of riparian corridors. In Wigington Jr., P. J. & R. L. Beschta (eds), Proceedings AWRA's 2000 Summer Specialty Conference: Riparian Ecology and Management in Multi-land-use Watersheds, Portland, OR.: 511-516.

  • Munn, M. D., R. W. Black & A. J. Gruber, 2002. Response of benthic algae to environmental gradients in an agriculturally dominated landscape. Journal of North American Benthological Society 21: 221–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Omernik, J. M., 1987. Ecoregions of the conterminous United States. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 77: 118–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pan, Y., R. J. Stevenson, B. Hill, P. Kaufmann & A. Herlihy, 1999. Spatial patterns and ecological determinants of benthic algal assemblages in the Mid-Atlantic streams. Journal of Phycology 35: 460–468.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pan, Y., R. J. Stevenson, B. Hill & A. Herlihy, 2000. Ecoregions and benthic diatom assemblages in Mid-Atlantic Highlands streams, USA. Journal of North American Benthological Society 19: 518–540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patrick, R. & C. W. Reimer, 1966. The Diatoms of the United States. Vol. 1. Monographs of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, No. 13.

  • Patrick, R. & C.W. Reimer, 1975. The Diatoms of the United States. Vol. 2, Part 1. Monographs of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia. No. 13.

  • Richards, C., R. J. Haro, L. B. Johnson & G. E. Host, 1997. Catchment and reach-scale properties as indicators of macroinvertebrate species traits. Freshwater Biology 37: 219–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, N. E., J. D. Allan & D. L. Erickson, 1996. Landscape influences on stream biotic integrity assessed at multiple spatial scales. Landscape Ecology 11: 141–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuft, M. J., T. J. Moser, P. J. Wigington, Jr., D. L. Stevens, Jr., L. S. McAlllster, S. S. Chapman & T. L. Ernst, 1999. Development of landscape metrics for characterizing riparian-stream networks. Photogrammetric Engineer & Remote Sensing 65: 1157–1167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, R. J., 1997. Scale-dependent determinants and consequences of benthic algal heterogeneity. Journal of North American Benthological Society 16: 248–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • ter Braak, C. J. F., 1995. Ordination. In Jongman, R. H. G., C. J. F. ter Braak & O. F. R. van Tongeren (eds.), Data Analysis in Community and Landscape Ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.: 91–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • ter Braak, C. J. F.& P. Smilauer, 1998. CANOCO Reference Manual and User's Guide to Canoco for Windows: Software for Canonical Community Ordination (version 4). Microcomputer Power, Ithaca, NY, 351 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uhrich, M. A. & D. A. Wentz, 1999. Environmental setting of the Willamette Basin, Oregon. U.S. Geological Survey, Water-Resources Investigations Report 97-4082-A, 20 pp.

  • USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency), 1987. Handbook of methods for acid deposition studies, laboratory analysis for surface water chemistry. EPA 600/4-87/026. U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Dam, H., A. Mertens & J. Sinkeldam, 1994. A coded checklist and ecological indicator values of freshwater diatoms from the Netherlands. Netherlands Journal of Aquatic Ecology 28: 117–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welch, E. B., J. M. Jacoby & C. W. May, 1998. Stream quality. In Naiman, R. J. & R. E. Bilby (eds), River Ecology and Management. Springer-Verlag, New York: 69–94.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pan, Y., Herlihy, A., Kaufmann, P. et al. Linkages among land-use, water quality, physical habitat conditions and lotic diatom assemblages: A multi-spatial scale assessment. Hydrobiologia 515, 59–73 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:HYDR.0000027318.11417.e7

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:HYDR.0000027318.11417.e7

Navigation