Abstract
Submerged plants are thought to negatively affect phytoplankton crops in the temperate zone by a number of mechanisms, including nutrient and light limitation, and enhancement of top-down control by offering diurnal refuge for zooplankton against visual predation, and by favouring piscivores. In 1997–1998, Lake Blanca (34° 54′ S, 54° 50′ W), a yellow-brownish shallow lake in Uruguay, suffered a severe water level reduction (associated with El Niño events between 1995–1997) that resulted in a massive fish kill and an extensive colonisation by Egeria densa. A clear water phase is established nowadays in the system (Secchi depth > 1 m), despite a fish community restricted to two small omnivorous–planktivorous fish: Jenynsia multidentata and Cnesterodon decemmaculatus. We studied the effects of E. densa on bottom-up and top-down controls on phytoplankton by comparing physical, chemical, and biological characteristics between submerged plant beds and sites without plants, from autumn 2000 to autumn 2001. The water column had low to intermediate nutrient concentrations, and phytoplankton community was highly diverse with a low to moderate biomass (mean Chl-a = 10.6 μg l−1). The water level, recovered during the study, promoted a dilution process that explained the temporal pattern of many chemical variables. Macrophyte PVI represented 28–39% of the lake volume (annual mean biomass = 174 g DW m−2). The zooplankton community was generally dominated by copepods in terms of biomass. Fish and zooplankton were significantly associated with submerged plant beds. In spite of the high biomass and density of omnivorous-planktivorous fish (115 kg ha−1, 13 ind m−2), zooplankton strongly affected phytoplankton spatial and temporal variation. The most important differences of algal biomass between zones coincided with a high herbivorous zooplankton biomass and/or with plants occupying the entire water column during the low level period. Medium-sized zooplankton declined with fish reproduction. The consequent stronger predation of juvenile fish seemed to decrease macrophyte efficiency as a zooplankton refuge in summer. E. densa bottom-up mechanisms would also be present, contributing to maintaining clear water. Besides the usually described nutrient and light limitation, the internal production of humic substances could enhance the observed top-down effect.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
APHA, 1985. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. APHA-AWWA-WPCF, 16th edition, Washington, 1265 pp.
Arvola, L., P. Eloranta, M. Järvinen, J. Keskitalo & A.-L. Holopainen, 1999. Phytoplankton. In Keskitalo, J. & P. Eloranta (eds), Limnology of Humic Waters. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden: 131–171.
Balls, H., B. Moss & K. Irvine, 1989. The loss of submerged plants with eutrophication. I. Experimental design, water chemistry, aquatic plant and phytoplankton biomass in experiments carried out in ponds in the Norfolk Broads. Freshwat. Biol. 22: 71–87
Barko, J. & R. Smart, 1980. Mobilization of sediment phosphorus by submersed freshwater macrophytes. Freshwat. Biol. 10: 229–238.
Barko, J. W. & W. F. James, 1998. Effects of submerged aquatic macrophytes on nutrient dynamics, sedimentation, and resuspension. In Jeppesen, E., Ma. Søndergaard, Mo. Søndergaard & K. Christoffersen (eds), The Structuring Role of Submerged Macrophytes in Lakes, Ecological Studies Vol. 131. Springer-Verlag, New York: 197–214.
Bini, L. M., S. M. Thomaz, K. J. Murphy & A. F. Camargo, 1999. Aquatic macrophytes distribution in relation to water and sediment conditions in the ItaipÚ Reservoir, Brazil. Hydrobiologia 415: 147–154.
Bottrell, H. H., A. Duncan, Z. M. Gliwicz, E. Grygierek, A. Herzing, A. Hillbricht-Ilkowska, H. Kurasawa, P. Larsson & T. Weglenska, 1976. A review of some problems in zooplankton production studies. Norwegian Journal of Zoology 24: 419–456.
Canfield, D. E. Jr., K. A. Langeland, M. J. Maceina, W. T. Haller, J. V. Shireman & J. R. Jones, 1983. Trophic state classification of lakes with aquatic macrophytes. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 40: 1713–1718.
Canfield, D. E. Jr., J. V. Shireman, D. E. Colle, W. T. Haller, C. E. Watkins & M. J. Maceina, 1984. Prediction of chlorophyll a concentrations in Florida lakes: importance of aquatic macrophytes. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 41: 497–501.
Collins, P., 1999. Feeding of Palaemonetes argentinus (Decapoda: Palaemonidae) from an oxbow lake of the Paraná River, Argentina. J. Crustacean Biol. 19: 485–492.
Coops, H., M. Beklioglu & T. L. Crisman, 2003. The role of water-level fluctuations in shallow lake ecosystems – workshop conclusions. Hydrobiologia 506–509: 23–27.
Feijoó, C., F. Momo, C. Bonetto & N. Tur, 1996. Factors influencing biomass and nutrient content of the submerged macrophytes Egeria densa Planch. in a pampasic stream. Hydrobiologia 341: 21–26.
Field, J. G., K. R. Clarke & R. M. Warwick, 1982. A practical strategy for analysing multispecies distribution patterns. Mar. Ecol. – Progress Series 8: 37–52.
García-Rodríguez, F., N. Mazzeo, P. Sprechmann, D. Metzeltin, F. Sosa, H. C. Treutler, M. Renom, B. Scharf & C. Gaucher, 2002. Paleolimnological assessment of human impacts in Lake Blanca, SE Uruguay. J. Paleolimnol. 28: 457–468.
Getsinger, K. & C. Dillon, 1984. Quiescence, growth and senescence of Egeria densa in Lake Marion. Aquat. Bot. 20: 329–338.
Hakanson, L. & M. Jansson, 1983. Principles of Lake Sedimentology. Springer-Verlag, New York, 316 pp.
Haramoto, T. & I. Ikusima, 1988. Life cycle of Egeria densa Planch., an aquatic plant naturalized in Japan. Aquat. Bot. 30: 389–403.
Hessen, D. O. & L. J. Tranvik (eds), 1998. Aquatic Humic Substances: Ecology and Biogeochemistry, Ecological Studies Vol. 133. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 352 pp.
Hillebrand, H., C-D. Dürselen, D. Kirschtel, U. Pollingher & T. Zohary, 1999. Biovolume calculation for pelagic and benthic microalgae. J. Phycol. 35: 403–424.
Jacobsen, L., M. R. Perrow, F. Landkildehus, M. Hjørne, T. L. Lauridsen & S. Berg, 1997. Interactions between piscivores, zooplanktivores and zooplankton in submerged macrophytes: preliminary observations from enclosure and pond experiments. Hydrobiologia 342/343: 197–205.
Jeppesen, E., T. L. Lauridsen, T. Kairesalo & M. R. Perrow, 1998. Impact of submerged macrophytes on fish-zooplankton interactions in lakes. In Jeppesen, E., Ma. Søndergaard, Mo. Søndergaard and K. Christoffersen (eds), The Structuring Role of Submerged Macrophytes in Lakes, Ecological Studies Vol. 131. Springer-Verlag, New York: 91–114.
Koroleff, F., 1970. Direct determination of ammonia in natural water as indophenol-blue. International Conference in the Exploration of the Sea. C.M. 1969/C9. ICES. Information on techniques and methods for sea water analysis. Interlaboratory Report 3: 19–22.
Lauridsen, T., L. J. Pedersen, E. Jeppesen, Ma. Søndergaard, 1996. The importance of macrophytes bed size for cladoceran composition and horizontal migration in a shallow lake. J. Plankton Res. 18: 2283–2294.
Müller, R. & O. Widemann, 1955. Die Bestimmung des Nitrat-Ions in Wasser. Von Wasser 22: 247.
Müllin, J. B. & J. P. Riley, 1955. The spectrophotometric determination of silicate-silicon in natural waters with special reference to sea water. Analytica Chimica Acta 12: 162–170.
Murphy, J. & J. P. Riley, 1962. A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphate in natural waters. Analytica Chimica Acta 27: 31–36.
Nusch, E., 1980. Comparisons of different methods for chlorophyll and phaeopigments determination. Arch. Hydrobiol. Beih. Ergebn. Limnol. 14: 14–36.
Paggi, J. & S. De Paggi. 1974. Primeros estudios sobre el zooplancton de las aguas lóticas del Paraná medio. Physis 33: 94–114.
Perrow, M. R., A. J. Jowitt & L. Zambrano, 1996. Sampling fish communities in shallow lowland lakes: point sample electric fishing vs. electric fishing within stop-nets. Fish. Manag. Ecol. 3: 303–313.
Perrow, M. R., A. J. Jowitt, J. H. Stansfield & G. L. Phillips, 1999. The practical importance of the interactions between fish, zooplankton and macrophytes in shallow lake restoration. Hydrobiologia 395/396: 199–210.
Persson, L. & L. B. Crowder, 1998. Fish-habitat interactions mediated via ontogenetic niche shifts. In Jeppesen, E., Ma. Søndergaard, Mo. Søndergaard & K. Christoffersen (eds), The Structuring Role of Submerged Macrophytes in Lakes, Ecological Studies Vol. 131. Springer-Verlag, New York: 3–23.
Reynolds, C. S., V. Huszar, C. Kruk, L. Naselli-Flores & S. De Melo, 2002. Towards a functional classification of the freshwater phytoplankton. Review. J. Plankton Res. 24: 417–428.
Ruggiero, A., A. G. SOlimini & G. Carchini, 2003. Nutrient and chlorophyll a temporal patterns in eutrophic mountain ponds with contrastng macrophyte coverage. Hydrobiologia 506–509: 657–663.
Ruttner-Kolisko, A., 1977. Suggestions for biomass calculations of plankton rotifers. Arch. Hydrobiol. Beih. Ergebn. Limnol. 8: 71–76.
Salas, H. & P. Martino, 1990. Metodologías simplificadas para la evaluación de eutrofización en lagos cálidos tropicales. CEPIS/HPE/OPS, Lima: 82 pp.
Sarvala, J., P. Kankaala, P. Zingel & L. Arvola, 1999. Zooplankton. In Keskitalo, J. & P. Eloranta (eds), Limnology of HumicWaters. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden: 173–191.
Senesi, N., T. M. Miano, M. R. Provenzano & G. Brunetti, 1989. Spectroscopic and compositional comparative characterization of I.H.S.S. reference and standard fulvic and humic acids of various origins. Sci. Total Environ. 81–82: 143–156.
Scheffer, M., 1998. Ecology of Shallow Lakes. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht: 356 pp.
Schriver, P., J. Bøgestrand, E. Jeppesen & Ma. Søndergaard, 1995. Impact of submerged macrophytes on fish–zooplankton– phytoplankton interactions: large-scale enclosure experiments in a shallow eutrophic lake. Freshwat. Biol. 33: 255–270
Sommer, U., 1988. Some size relationships in phytoflagellated motility. Hydrobiologia 161: 125–131.
Søndergaard, Ma. & B. Moss, 1998. Impact of submerged macrophytes on phytoplankton in shallow freshwater lakes. In Jeppesen, E., Ma. Søndergaard, Mo. Søndergaard & K. Christoffersen (eds), The Structuring Role of Submerged Macrophytes in Lakes, Ecological Studies Vol. 131. Springer-Verlag, New York: 115–132.
St. John, H., 1961. Monograph of the genus Egeria Planchon. Darwiniana 12: 293–307.
Timms, R. M. & B. Moss, 1984. Prevention of growth of potentially dense phytoplankton populations by zooplankton grazing, in the presence of zooplanktivorous fish, in a shallow wetland ecosystem. Limnol. Oceanogr. 29: 472–476.
Underwood, A. J., 1997. Experiments in Ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 504 pp.
Ñtermöhl, H., 1958. Zür Vervollkommung der quantitativen Phytoplankton-Methodik. Mitteil. int. Ver. theor. angew. Limnol. 9: 1–38.
Valderrama, J., 1981. The simultaneous analysis of total N y P in natural waters. Mar. Chem. 10: 1009–1022.
van Donk, E. & R. D. Gulati, 1995. Transition of a lake to turbid state six years after biomanipulation: mechanisms and pathways. Wat. Sci. Technol. 32: 197–206.
Wojtal, A., P. Frankiewicz, K. Izydorczyk & M. Zalewski, 2003. Horizontal migration of zooplankton in a littoral zone of the lowland Sulejow Reservoir (Central Poland). Hydrobiologia 506–509: 339–346.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mazzeo, N., Rodríguez-Gallego, L., Kruk, C. et al. Effects of Egeria densa Planch. beds on a shallow lake without piscivorous fish. Hydrobiologia 506, 591–602 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:HYDR.0000008571.40893.77
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:HYDR.0000008571.40893.77