Skip to main content
Log in

The relationship between university autonomy and funding in England and Taiwan

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper aims to re-examine the effects offunding on university autonomy since therelationship between university autonomy andfunding is likely to be interpreted as a lineareffect; namely, the more funding the greaterautonomy. Such a simplistic vision is less than complete since it ignores the complicated nature of university autonomy. The nature of the latter should be defined contextually and politically. Itsinterpretation should also be placed in thechanging government-university relationships.This paper argues that the effect of funding on university autonomy is conditioned by the nature of university autonomy in a given country. While universityautonomy involves more than a financial tie,greater efforts on the part of universities todiversify their funding bases may well notenhance, at least directly, their autonomy.Through an extensive literature review, andempirical studies conducted in England and Taiwan, the argument of this paper is supported.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acherman, J. and Brons, R. (eds.) (1989). Changing Financial Relations between Government and Higher Education. Uitgeverij Lemma.

  • Altbach, P. (1998). Comparative Higher Education: Knowledge, the University, and Development. Ablex Publishing Corporation.

  • Ashby, E. (1966). Universities, British, Indian, African: A Study in the Ecology of Higher Education. Widenfeld and Nicolson.

  • Becher, T. and Kogan, M. (1992). Process and Structure in Higher Education. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berdahl, R. (1991). 'Autonomy and accountability in US higher education', in Neave, G. and van Vught, F. (eds.), Prometheus Bound: The Changing Relationship between Government and Higher Education in Western Europe. Pergamous Press.

  • Berdahl, R. (1993). 'Public universities and state governments: Is the tension benign?', in CEPES/UNESCO, Academic Freedom and University Autonomy. Bucharest: UNESCO European Centre for Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caglar, A. (1993). 'Academic freedom, autonomy, and accountability in the restructuring and coordination of multi-university national systems', in CEPES/UNESCO, Academic Freedom and University Autonomy. Bucharest: UNESCO European Centre for Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiang, L-C. (2000). The Relationship between University Autonomy and Funding in England and in Taiwan. Doctoral dissertation, Institute of Education, University of London.

  • Chung, Y-S. (2002). 'Analysis about financial problems of transforming national universities to public corporations', Presented at the conference of Promotion of Integration and Competitiveness of Higher Education, Taiwan.

  • Clark, B. (1998). Creating Entrepreneurial Universities: Organizational Pathways of Transformation. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dearing Report (1997). Higher Education in the Learning Society. The National Committee of Inquiry into Higher Education.

  • Department of Education and Science (DES) (1991). White Paper: Higher Education: A New Framework. Cm 1541. HMSO.

  • Duderstadt, J. (2000). A University for the 21st Century. The University of Michigan Press.

  • Eustace, R. (1994). 'University autonomy: The '80s and after', Higher Education Quarterly 48(2), 86–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrant, J. (1987). 'Central control of the university sector', in Becher, T. (ed.), British Higher Education. London: Allen & UnWin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goedegebuure, L. et al. (eds.) (1994). Higher Education Policy: An International Comparative Perspectives. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • HEFCE (2001). Funding High Education in England: How the HEFCE Allocates Its Funds (HEFCE Guide 01/14). Bristol: HEFCE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, C-C. (2002). 'Problems in university resources and strategies'. Presented at the Conference of University Integration and Strategies, Taipei.

  • Jadot, J. (1981). 'Survey of the state-of-the-art and likely future trends of university management in Europe', International Journal of Institutional Management in Higher Education 5(1), 49–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, C. (1995). The Uses of the University (4th ed). Harvard University Press.

  • Levy, D. (1980). University and Government inMexico: Autonomy in an Authoritarian System. Praeger.

  • Levy, D. (1994). 'Mexico: Towards state supervision? Changing patterns of governance in Mexican higher education', in Neave, G. and van Vught, F. (eds.), Government and Higher Education Relationship Across Three Continents: The Winds of Change. Exeter: BPC Wheaton Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Yuan-Jiun (1995). 'Higher education'. Presented at the annual meeting of Chinese Comparative Education Society-Taipei, Taiwan.

  • Lockwood, G. (1987). 'The management of universities', in Becher, T. (ed.), British Higher Education. London: Allen & UnWin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayor, F. (1993). 'Academic Freedom and University Autonomy', CEPES/UNESCO, Academic Freedom and University Autonomy. Bucharest: UNESCO European Centre for Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel, O. (1996). 'The paradigms of governance in higher education systems', Higher Education Policy 9(2), 137–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melody, W. (1997) 'Universities and public policy', in Smith, A. and Webster, F. (eds.), The Postmodern University? Contested Visions of Higher Education in Society. SRHE/Open University Press.

  • Musselin, C. (1996). 'Relationships between the universities and the state and how to change them: the case of France and Germany'. Presented at ESRC Seminar Series: Changing Relationship between higher education and the state.

  • Neave, G. (1988). 'On being economic with university autonomy: Being an account of the retrospective joys of a written constitution', in Tight, M. (ed.), Academic Freedom and Responsibility. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neave, G. and van Vught, F. (eds.) (1994). Government and Higher Education Relationship Across Three Continents: The Winds of Change. Exeter: BPC Wheaton Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton, J. (2002). 'Views from below: Academic coping with quality', Quality in Higher Education 8(1), 39–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins Report (1963). Higher Education. Cm 2154. HMSO.

  • Robertson, D. (1998) 'Who won the war of Dearing's ear', Higher Education Review 30(2), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salter, B. and Tapper, T. (1994). The State and Higher Education. The Woburn Press.

  • Scott, P. (1995). The Meaning of Mass Higher Education. Open University Press.

  • Shattock, M. and Berdahl, R. (1984). 'The British University Grants Committee 1919-83: Changing relationships with government and the universities', Higher Education 13, 471–499.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sizer, J. (1992). 'Accountability', in Clark, B. and Neave, G. (eds.), Encyclopedia of Higher Education. Pergamon Press.

  • Slaughter, S. and Leslie, L. (1997). Academic Capitalism: Politics, Policies, and the Entrepreneurial University. The Johns Hopkins University Press.

  • Tight, M. (1992). 'Institutional autonomy', in Clark, B. and Neave, G. (eds.), Encyclopaedia of Higher Education. Pergamon Press.

  • Trow, M. (1996). 'Trust, markets and accountability in higher education: A comparative perspective', Higher Education Policy 9(4), 309–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trowler, P. (ed.) (2002). Higher Education Policy and Institutional Change: Intensions and Outcomes in Turbulent Environments. London: SRHE.

    Google Scholar 

  • UGC (1984). A Strategy for Higher Education into the 1990s. HMSO.

  • Williams, G. (1992). Changing Patterns of Finance in Higher Education. London: SRHE.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chiang, LC. The relationship between university autonomy and funding in England and Taiwan. Higher Education 48, 189–212 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:HIGH.0000034314.77435.bf

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:HIGH.0000034314.77435.bf

Navigation