Skip to main content
Log in

Public Money and Private Providers: Funding Channels and National Patterns in Four Countries

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A rich body of literature has emerged that seeks to shed further light on how concepts like globalization and internationalization shape higher education systems and their institutions. This paper examines how the rise of private higher education in various national contexts has engendered global patterns of public financial support for private institutions and particularly the various ways in which public funding is channeled to such providers. A cross-national typology of public/private higher education sectors and a system-level ‘map’ of how public funding is directed to institutions are both used to explain why different patterns may emerge. This framework is then used to examine the policies and practices in four representative systems: England, Germany, New Zealand, and the state of Pennsylvania in the United States. The available evidence suggests that in systems with weak or newly emerging private sectors, unclear regulations and concerns about quality implies that public funding tends to be channeled into private institutions indirectly (e.g. through tax-abatements and student financial aid). In systems where private institutions play a more substantial role, public funding is channeled to privates using a mix of indirect and direct mechanisms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altbach, P.G. (2000).‘Comparative perspectives on private higher education’ in Altbach P.G. (ed.), Private prometheus: Private Higher Education and Development in the 21st Century. London: Greenwood Press, pp. 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altbach, P.G. (ed.) (2001a). ‘Private Prometheus: Private Higher Education and Development in the 21st Century.’ London: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altbach,P.G.(2001b).‘The rise of the pseudouniversity.’International Higher Edu- cation [On-line]. Available:http://www.bc.edu/bc_org/avp/soe/cihe/.

  • Astin, A.W. and Inouye, C.J. (1988).‘How public policy at the state level affects private higher education institutions’ Economics of Education Review 7(1), 47–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, D. (2001). ‘The worldwide rise of private colleges: In nation after nation, the public monopoly on higher education is over’. The Chronicle of Higher Education p. A47.

  • Foley, J. (2001). Student support: Statistics of student loans for higher education in United Kingdom-financial year 2000-2001 and academic year 2000-2001. [On-line]. Available: www.dfee.gov.uk/statistics/DB/SFR.

  • Giesecke,H.C.(1999).‘Expansion and development of private higher education in east central Europe’.International Higher Education [On-line]. Available:www.bc.edu/ bc_org/avp/soe/cihe/newsletter/News16/text1.html.

  • HEFCE (2001).‘Widening participation in higher education:Funding decisions for2001-2002 to 2003-2004’.Higher Education Funding Council for England. [On-line]. Available:www.hefce.ac.uk/Pubs/hefce/2001/01_29.htm.

  • Huisman, J., Jongbloed, B.W.A. and Salerno, C.S. (2004).‘Funded and non-funded higher education: Programs and clients’ Background report prepared for the Netherlands' Education Council.

  • James, E. (1990).‘Decision processes and priorities in higher education’ in Hoenack, S.A. and Collins, E.I. (eds.), The Economics of American Universities. Buffalo, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jongbloed, B.W.A. and Salerno, C.S. (2002).‘Funding and recognition: A comparative study of funded versus non-funded higher education in eight countries’ Enschede, Netherlands: Center for Higher Education Policy Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, F., van der Meer, P., Beverwijk, J., Klemperer, A., Steunenberg, B. and van Wageningen, A. (1999).‘Market type mechanisms in higher education: A comparative analysis of their occurrence and discussions on the issue in five higher education systems’ CHEPS Higher Education Monitor: Thematic report VI. Enschede, Netherlands: Center for Higher Education Policy Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kokosalakis, N. (1999).‘Non-official higher education in the EU: Synthesis document’ in Kokosalakis, N. (ed.), Non-official Higher Education in the European Union. Athens, Greece: Library of Social Science and Social Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, D.C. (1986).‘Alternative private-public blends in higher education finance: International patterns’ in Levy, D.C. (ed.), Private Education: Studies in Choice and Public Policy. New York: Oxford University Press, (pp. 195–213).

    Google Scholar 

  • org/avp/soe/cihe/newsletter/ News12/text5.html.

  • Selingo, J. (2001).‘Grant program angers Pennsylvania colleges’ The Chronicle of Higher Education p. A22.

  • Thompson, F. and Zumeta, W. (2001).‘Effects of key state policies on private colleges and universities: Sustaining private-sector capacity in the face of the higher education access challenge’ Economics of Education Review 20, 517–531.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, E.G. (1995).‘Education with and without the state’ World Bank HCO Working Paper, number 61.

  • Winston, G.C. (1999). Subsidies, hierarchy and peers: The awkward economics of higher education. Journal of economic perspectives 13, 13–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zumeta, W. (1996).‘Meeting the demand for higher education without breaking the bank’ Journal of Higher Education 4, 367–425.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carlo Salerno.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Salerno, C. Public Money and Private Providers: Funding Channels and National Patterns in Four Countries. Higher Education 48, 101–130 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:HIGH.0000033767.84394.47

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:HIGH.0000033767.84394.47

Navigation