Abstract
Previous research has generallyfailed to find a relation between the waystudents approach the task of studying andtheir exam grades. The present studyinvestigated why it is that a deep approach tostudying, which has been shown to result in ahigher quality of learning, does notconsistently result in higher exam grades. Theparticipants in the study were 49 third-yearpsychology students. They completedquestionnaires that assessed approaches tostudying, motivation, and intelligence. Theirfinal exam marks, along with indicators of thequality of their final exam responses and thequantity of information reproduced in the finalexam were used as indicators of academicperformance. The results showed that the deepstudy approach was linearly related to thequality of exam responses, but quadraticallyrelated to the quantity of informationreproduced. The use of the deep approach was nomore effective in facilitating high exam marksfor questions that emphasised understanding ofthe study material than for questions thatemphasised reproduction of it. Taken together,these findings suggest that students who usehigh levels of the deep approach fail toconsistently achieve higher exam grades becauseof deficiencies in the quantity of theirresponses, rather than because of theinsensitivity of exams to students'understanding of the study material.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beckwith, J.B. (1991). ‘Approaches to learning, their context and relationship to assessment performance’, Higher Education 22, 17–30.
Biggs, J.B. (1979). ‘Individual differences in study processes and the quality of learning processes’, Higher Education 8, 381–394.
Biggs, J.B. (1985). ‘Learning styles: The role of metalearning in study processes’, British Journal of Educational Psychology 55, 185–212.
Biggs, J.B. and Collis, K.F. (1982). Evaluating the Quality of Learning: The SOLO Taxonomy. New York: Academic Press.
Busato, V.V., Prins, F.J., Elshout, J.J. and Hamaker, C. (1998). ‘Learning styles: A crosssectional and longitudinal study in higher education’, British Journal of Educational Psychology 68, 427–441.
Cantwell, R.H. and Moore, P.J. (1998). ‘Relationships among control beliefs, approaches to learning, and the academic performance of final-year nurses’, The Alberta Journal of Educational Research 44, 98–102.
Clarke, R.M. (1986). ‘Students' approaches to learning in an innovative medical school: A cross-sectional study’, British Journal of Educational Psychology 56, 309–321.
Elliot, A.J. and Church, M.A. (1997). ‘A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 72, 218–232.
Elliot, A.J., McGregor, H.A. and Gable, S. (1999). ‘Achievement goals, study strategies, and exam performance: A mediational analysis’, Journal of Educational Psychology 91, 549–563.
Entwistle, N.J. (1998). ‘Understanding academic performance at university: A research retrospective’ in Shorrocks-Taylor, D. (ed.), Directions in Educational Psychology. London, England: Whurr Publishers, pp. 106–127.
Entwistle, A. and Entwistle, N.J. (1991). ‘Contrasting forms of understanding for degree examinations: The student experience and its implications’, Higher Education 22, 205–227.
Entwistle, A. and Entwistle, N.J. (1992). ‘Experiences of understanding in revising for degree examinations’, Learning and Instruction 2, 1–22.
Entwistle, N.J. and Ramsden, P. (1983). Understanding Student Learning. London: Croom Helm.
Entwistle, N.J. and Tait, H. (1994). The Revised Approaches to Studying Inventory. University of Edinburgh: Centre for Research into Learning and Instruction.
Greene, B.A. and Miller, R.B. (1996). ‘Influences on achievement: Goals, perceived ability, and cognitive engagement’, Contemporary Educational Psychology 21, 181–192.
Hall, C.W., Bolen, L.M. and Gupton, Jr., R.H. (1995). ‘Predictive validity of the study process questionnaire for undergraduate students’, College Student Journal 29, 234–239.
Harper, G. and Kember, D. (1989). ‘Interpretation of factor analyses from the approaches to studying inventory’, British Journal of Educational Psychology 59, 66–74.
Heim, A.W. (1968). Manual for the AH5 Group Test of High-Grade Intelligence. Windsor, England: NFER-Nelson.
Kember, D. and Leung, D.Y.P. (1998). ‘The dimensionality of approaches to learning: An investigation with confirmatory factor analysis on the structure of the SPQ and LPQ’, British Journal of Educational Psychology 68, 395–407.
Kember, D. Wong, A. and Leung, D.Y.P. (1999). ‘Reconsidering the dimensions of approaches to learning’, British Journal of Educational Psychology 69, 323–343.
Marton, F. and Saljö, R. (1976). ‘On qualitative differences in learning: I-Outcome and process’, British Journal of Educational Psychology 46, 4–11.
Newstead, S.E. (1992). ‘A study of two “quick-and-easy” methods of assessing individual differences in learning’, British Journal of Educational Psychology 62, 299–312.
Nolen, S.B. (1988). ‘Reasons for studying: Motivational orientations and study strategies’, Cognition and Instruction 5, 269–287.
Pintrich, P.R. and Garcia, T. (1991). ‘Student goal orientation and self-regulation in the college classroom’, in Maehr, M. and Printich, P.R. (eds.), Advances in Motivation and Achievement: Goals and Self-Regulatory Processes (Vol. 7, pp. 371–402). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
Prosser, M. and Trigwell, K. (1999). Understanding Learning and Teaching: The Experience in Higher Education. Philadelphia, PA: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
Ramsden, P. (1988). ‘Context and strategy: Situational influences on learning’, in Schmeck, R.R. (ed.), Learning Strategies and Learning Styles. New York: Plenum Press, pp. 159–184.
Richardson, J.T.E. (1997). ‘Meaning orientation and reproducing orientation: A typology of approaches to studying in higher education’, Educational Psychology 17, 301–311.
Rose, R.J., Hall, C.W., Bolen, L.M. and Webster, R.E. (1996). ‘Locus of control and college students' approaches to learning’, Psychological Reports 79, 163–171.
Sadler-Smith, E. (1996). ‘Approaches to studying: Age, gender and academic performance’, Educational Studies 22, 367–379.
Sadler-Smith, E. and Tsang, F. (1998). ‘A comparative study of approaches to studying in Hong Kong and the United Kingdom’, British Journal of Educational Psychology 68, 81–93.
Scouller, K. (1998). ‘The influence of assessment method on students' learning approaches: Multiple choice question examination versus assignment essay’, Higher Education 35, 453–472.
Tait, H. and Entwistle, N.J. (1996). ‘Identifying students at risk through ineffective study strategies’, Higher Education 31, 97–116.
Trigwell, K. and Prosser, M. (1991). ‘Relating approaches to study and quality of learning outcomes at the course level’, British Journal of Educational Psychology 61, 265–275.
Van Rossum, E.J. and Schenk, S.M. (1984). ‘The relationship between learning conception, study strategy and learning outcome’, British Journal of Educational Psychology 54, 73–83.
Vermunt, J.D. (1996). ‘Metacognitive, cognitive and affective aspects of learning styles and strategies: A phenomenographic analysis’, Higher Education 31, 25–50.
Vermunt, J. D. (1998). ‘The regulation of constructive learning processes’, British Journal of Educational Psychology 68, 149–171.
Watkins, D. (1983). ‘Depth of processing and the quality of learning outcomes’, Instructional Science 12, 49–58
Watkins, D. (1988). ‘The motive/strategy model of learning processes: Some empirical findings’, Instructional Science 17, 159–168.
Watkins, D. and Hattie, J. (1981). ‘The learning processes of Australian university students: Investigations of contextual and personological factors’, British Journal of Educational Psychology 51, 384–393.
Wong, N., Lin,W. and Watkins, D. (1996). ‘Cross-cultural validation of models of approaches to learning: An application of confirmatory factor analysis’, Educational Psychology 16, 317–323.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Minbashian, A., Huon, G.F. & Bird, K.D. Approaches to studying and academic performance in short-essay exams. Higher Education 47, 161–176 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:HIGH.0000016443.43594.d1
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:HIGH.0000016443.43594.d1