Skip to main content

Life Extension Research: Health, Illness, and Death

Abstract

Scientists, bioethicists, and policy makers are currently engaged in a contentious debate about the scientific prospects and morality of efforts to increase human longevity. Some demographers and geneticists suggest that there is little reason to think that it will be possible to significantly extend the human lifespan. Other biodemographers and geneticists argue that there might well be increases in both life expectancy and lifespan. Bioethicists and policy makers are currently addressing many of the ethical, social, and economic issues raised by life extension research. However, the emphasis on philosophical argument supporting or condemning efforts to increase human longevity means that much less attention is currently being given to the factors that might play a role in generating interest in efforts to increase human longevity. This analysis considers three factors that might play a role in heightening public interest in efforts to develop biomedical technologies capable of retarding or reversing aging processes. While discussions of life extension research can seem quite futuristic and impractical, there are some powerful existential factors that might well generate considerable public support for life extension strategies if effective biomedical interventions emerge. Rather than providing philosophical justifications supporting or condemning efforts to increase human longevity, this essay seeks to promote a better understanding of the factors generating contemporary interest in prolonging life and postponing death.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

REFERENCES

  • Aries, P. (1974) Western Attitudes Toward Death: From the Middle Ages to the Present. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aries, P. (1981) The Hour of Our Death. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banks, D.A., and Fossel, M. (1997) Telomeres, Cancer, and Aging. Journal of American Medical Association 278(16), 1345–1348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, E. (1973) The Denial of Death. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binstock, R. (2003) The War on “Anti-Aging Medicine.” The Gerontologist 43(1), 4–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callahan, D. (2000) Death and the Research Imperative, New England Journal of Medicine 342(9), 654–656.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnes, B., Olshansky, S.J., and Grahn, D. (2003) Biological Evidence for Limits to the Duration of Life. Biogerontology 4,31–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chrysanthou, M. (2002) Transparency and Selfhood: Utopia and the Informed Body. Social Science and Medicine 54, 469–479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalrymple, T. (1998) Mass Listeria: The Meaning of Health Scares. London: Andre Deutsch Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeGrey, A., Ames, B., Andersen, J., Bartke, A., Campisi, J., Heward, C., McCarter, R., and Stock, G. (2002) Time to Talk SENS: Critiquing the Immutability of Human Aging. New York Academy of Science 959, 452–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeGrey, A., Baynes, J., Berd, D., Heward, C.B., Pawelec, G., and Stock, G. (2002) Is Human Aging Still Mysterious Enough to be Left Only to Scientists? Bioessays 24, 667–676.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fossel, M. (2002) Cell Senescence in Human Aging Disease. New York Academy of Science 959, 14–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F. (2002) Our Posthuman Future: Consequences of the Biotechnology Revolution. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glannon, W. (2002) Identity, Prudential Concern, and Extended Lives. Bioethics 16(3), 266–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldenberg, J.L., Pyszcynski, T., Greenberg, J., and Solomon, S. (2000) Fleeing the Body: A Terror Management Perspective on the Problem of Human Corporeality. Personality and Social Psychol-ogy Review 4(3), 200–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, J. (2003) Intimations of Immortality. Science 228, 5463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horiuchi, S. (2000) Greater Lifetime Expectations. Nature 405, 744–745.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juengst, E. (2002) Growing Pains: Bioethical Perspectives on Growth Hormone Replacement Research. Journal of Anti-Aging Medicine 5(1), 73–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juengst, E., Binstock, R., Melhlman, M., and Post, S. (2003) Anti-Aging Research and the Need for Public Dialogue. Science 299, 1323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalache, A., Aboderin, I., and Hoskins, I. (2002) Compression of Morbidity and Active Ageing: Key Priorities for Public Health Policy in the 21st Century. Bulletin of the World Health Organisation 80,3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kass, L. (2001) L'Chaim and Its Limits: Why Not Immortality? First Things 113,17–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Laslett, P. (1997) Interpreting the Demographic Changes. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 352, 1805–1809.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mellor, P., and Shilling, C. (1993) Modernity, Self-Identity and the Sequestration of Death. Sociology 27(3), 411–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R. (2002) Extending Life: Scientific Prospects and Political Obstacles. The Milbank Quarterly 80(1), 155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. (2001) Women and Human Development. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oeppen, J., and Vaupel, J. (2002) Broken Limits to Life Expectancy. Science 296, 1029–1031.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olshansky, J., Carnes, B., and Désesquelles, A. (2001) Prospect for Human Longevity. Science 292, 1654–1655.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parens, E. (1995) The Goodness of Fragility: On the Prospect of Genetic Technologies Aimed at the Enhancement of Human Capacities. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 5(2):141–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, Amartya (2000) Development as Freedom. New York: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapin, S., and Martyn, C. (2000) How to Life for Ever. BMJ 321, 1580–2

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, S., Greenberg, J., and Pyszczynski, T. (2000) Pride and Prejudice: Fear of Death and Social Behavior. Current Directions in Pyschological Science 9(6), 200–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Charles (1989) Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity. Harvard: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuljapurkar, S., Li, N., and Boe, C. (2000) A Universal Pattern of Mortality Decline in G7 Countries. Nature 405, 789–792.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Gennep, A. (1960) The Rites of Passage. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1908)

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaupel, J., Carey, Christiansen, et al. (1998) Biodemographic Trajectories of Longevity. Science 280, 855–860.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wick, G. (2002) ‘Anti-Aging’ Medicine: Does it Exist? A Critical Discussion of ‘Anti-Aging Health Products.’ Experimental Gerontology 37, 1137–1140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilmoth, J. (1998) The Future of Human Longevity: A Demographer's Perspective. Science 280, 395–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilmoth, J., Deegan, L., Lundström, H., and Horiuchi, S. (2000) Increase in Maximum Life-Span in Sweden. Science 289, 2366–2368.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Turner, L. Life Extension Research: Health, Illness, and Death. Health Care Analysis 12, 117–129 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:HCAN.0000041186.34205.98

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:HCAN.0000041186.34205.98

  • life extension
  • denial of death
  • human finitude
  • aging
  • longevity
  • psychological considerations