Health Care Analysis

, Volume 12, Issue 1, pp 51–60 | Cite as

Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis: Choosing the “Good Enough” Child

Article

Abstract

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) raises serious moral questions concerning the parent-child relationship. Good parents accept their children unconditionally: they do not reject/attack them because they do not have the features they want. There is nothing wrong with treating a child as someone who can help promote some other worthwhile end, providing the child is also respected as an end in him or herself. However, if the child's presence is not valued in itself, regardless of any further benefits it brings, the child is not being treated as an end in the full sense of the term. In this paper, I argue that these principles apply to human embryos, as well as to born human offspring: the human moral subject is a bodily being, whose interests and rights begin with the onset of his or her bodily life. The rights of the living, bodily human individual include a right not to be attacked/abandoned because of his or her genetic profile. PGD is harmful to the parent-child relationship, and we give mixed messages to parents by expecting them to show unconditional commitment to offspring after birth, while inviting them to take a very different approach at the prenatal stage.

children embryo embryo biopsy genetic testing parenthood preimplantation genetic diagnosis procreation tissue typing twinning 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Austriaco, N. (2003) The Pre-Implantation Embryo Revisited: A Two-Celled Individual or Two Individual Cells? Linacre Quarterly 70(2), 121–126.Google Scholar
  2. Braine, D. (1993) The Human Person: Animal and Spirit. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
  3. Chappell, T. (1998) Understanding Human Goods: A Theory of Ethics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Fisher, A. (1991) Individuogenesis and a Recent Book by Fr Norman Ford. Anthropotes 7(2), 199–235.Google Scholar
  5. Grisez, G., Boyle, J., and Finnis, J. (1987) Practical Principles, Moral Truth and Ultimate Ends. American Journal of Jurisprudence 32, 99–151.Google Scholar
  6. Henderson, M. (2003) The Woman Who Keeps Watch on Scientists' Acts of Creation. Times August 30. www.timesonline.co.uk/printFriendly/0,,1-2-797389,00.html, viewed on 02/09/2003Google Scholar
  7. Highfield, R. (2003) Time Running Out for Sick Boy Caught in Pro-Life Protest. Telegraph April 1. www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2003/04/01/nzain01.xml&sSheet=/ (accessed on 1/4/2003)Google Scholar
  8. Hogben, M. (1998) What Size Is an Embryo's Soul? Human Life Review 24, 88–93.Google Scholar
  9. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority. (2003) Sex Selection: Options for Regulation: A Report on the HFEA's 2002-03 Review of Sex Selection Including a Discussion of Legislative and Regulatory Options. London: HFEA.Google Scholar
  10. McWhinnie, A. (1996) Outcome for Families Created by Assisted Conception Programmes. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 13(4), 363–365.Google Scholar
  11. Munthe, C. (2001) Divisibility and the Moral Status of Embryos. Bioethics 15(5/6), 382–397.Google Scholar
  12. Oderberg, D. (1997) Modal Properties, Moral Status and Identity. Philosophy and Public Affairs 26, 259–298.Google Scholar
  13. Oderberg, D. (2000) Moral Theory: A Non-Consequentialist Approach. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  14. Olson, E. (1997) The Human Animal. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Orofino, M., Argiolu, F., Sanna, M., Rosatelli, M., Tuveri, T., Scalas, M., Badiali, M., Cossu, P., Puddu, R., Lai, M., Cao, A. (2003) Fetal HLA Typing in Beta-Thalassaemia: Implications for Haemopoietic Stem-Cell Transplantation. Lancet 362, 41–42.Google Scholar
  16. Prentice, D. (2002) Witness Statement made on 6 October (Exhibits DP/1-2) to the High Court hearing of R (on the application of Quintavalle) v. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority [2003] 2 All ER 105; [2003] 3 All ER 257.Google Scholar
  17. Saunders, P. (2003) Designer Babies. Triple Helix 24, 4.Google Scholar
  18. Verkaik, R. (2003) Britain's First 'Designer Baby' Prompts Call for Law Change. Independent June 20, p. 1.Google Scholar
  19. Watt, H. (2000) Life and Death in Healthcare Ethics: A Short Introduction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Linacre Centre for Healthcare EthicsLondonUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations