Skip to main content
Log in

Embedding the reforms in New Zealand schooling: After neo-liberalism?

  • Published:
GeoJournal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two decades of reforms to the state in New Zealand have altered policy, its making and the ways in which it is realised in micro settings. This paper uses the example of schooling to examine the rationality of these reforms, their spatial logic and what they mean for our understanding of the national state. It examines the development and practices of the Education Review Office (ERO), the body established under the reforms to evaluate and audit the performance of schools in the new national education `system'. The paper interprets neo-liberalism as a governmentality, and argues that the development of new managerial technologies of remote control such as contract and audit constitute a spatial model of control. The paper suggests that this model encourages, and relies for its efficacy upon, the cultivation of neo-liberal subjectivities. It argues that although the political projects working through the reforms have shifted, the altered rationality of the state and the models of control erected to secure it define an enduring and neo-liberalising social transformation. The shift to the `Third Way' in New Zealand's political and social economy is underpinned by neo-liberalising processes, which continue to reorganise social and economic spaces.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barry A., Osborne T. and Rose N., 1996: Introduction. In: Barry A., Osborne T. and Rose N. (eds), Foucault and Political Reason: Liberalism, Neo-liberalism and Rationalities of Government. pp. 1-17. The University of Chicago Press.

  • Burki S. and Perry G., 1998: Beyond the Washington Consensus: Institutions Matter. World Bank, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callinicos A., 1999: Social Theory Put to the Test of Politics: Pierre Bourdieu and Anthony Giddens. New Left Review 236: 77-102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cerny P., 1997: Paradoxes of the Competition State: The Dynamics of Political Globalisation. Government and Opposition 32(2) 251-274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke J. and Newman J., 1997: The Managerial State: Power, Politics and Ideology in the Remaking of Social Welfare. Sage, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dale R., 1989: The State and Education Policy. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

  • Dale R., 1997: Educational Markets and School Choice, British Journal of Sociology of Education 18(3): 451-168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies S. and Guppy N., 1997: Globalisation and educational reforms in Anglo-American democracies. Comparative Education Review 41(4): 435-460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean M., 1996: Foucault, Government and the Enfolding of Authority. In: Barry A., Osborne T. and Rose N. (eds), Foucault and Political Reason: Liberalism, Neo-liberalism and Rationalities of Government. pp. 209-229. The University of Chicago Press.

  • Easton B., 1997: The Commercialisation of New Zealand. Auckland University Press, Auckland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Education Review Office, 1992: Education Review Office: Internal Auditor for the Executive (in the education sector). Public Sector 15(3): 7-10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Education Review Office, 1994-1998: National Education Evaluation Reports (various), ERO, Wellington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Education Review Office, 1992-1999: Annual Reports (various), ERO, Wellington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Education Review Office, 1994a: Good New Zealand Schools. ERO, Wellington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Education Review Office, 1994b: Self Review in Schools. ERO, Wellington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Education Review Office, 1996a: Education Review Office Post Election Brief December 1996. ERO, Wellington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Education Review Office, 1996b: Education Review Office Strategic Plan 1996-2001. ERO, Wellington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Education Review Office, 1996c: Improving Schooling in Mangere and Otara, ERO, Wellington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Education Review Office, 1997a: Choosing a Secondary School. ERO, Wellington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Education Review Office, 1997b: Choosing a School for a Five Year Old. ERO, Wellington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Education Review Office, 1997c: Improving schooling on the East Coast. ERO, Wellington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Education Review Office, 1998a: Schooling in the Far North. ERO, Wellington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Education Review Office, 1998b: Good Schools Poor Schools. ERO, Wellington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Education Review Office, 1999a: School Governance and Student Achievement. ERO, Wellington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Education Review Office, 2000a: Accountability Reviews: A Guide for Boards of Trustees. ERO, http://www.ero.govt.nz 27/1/2000 Wellington.

  • Fiske E. and Ladd H., 2000: When Schools Compete: A Cautionary Tale. Brookings Institution Press, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzsimons P. and Peters M., 1994: Human capital theory and the industry training strategy in New Zealand. Journal of Education Policy 9(3): 245-266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama F., 2001: Social capital, civil society and development. Third World Quarterly 22(1): 7-14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert N., 1998: 'Remodelling social welfare.' Society 35(5): 8-14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hindess B., 1997: A Society Governed by Contract. In: Davis G., Sullivan B. and Yeatman A. (eds), The New Contractualism? pp. 14-26. Macmillan, Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan D., 1997: The Social Economy of Parent Choice and the Contract State. In: Davis G., Sullivan B. and Yeatman A. (eds), The New Contractualism? pp. 119-136. Macmillan, Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hood C., 1991: A public management for all seasons. Public Administration 69: 3-19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon L., 1999: Commentary: from nation-building to profit-making: the past present and future of schooling in New Zealand. In: Thrupp M. (ed.), A Decade of Reform in New Zealand Education: Where to Now? Special Issue of The New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, School of Education, University of Waikato, pp. 247-254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessop B., 1990: Regulation theories in retrospect and prospect. Economy and Society 19: 153-212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessop B., 1999: Narrating the Future of the National Economy and the National State: Remarks on Remapping Regulation and Reinventing Governance. In: Steinmetz G. (ed.), State/Culture: State Formation After the Cultural Turn, Ithaca, Cornell University Press, pp. 379-405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessop B., 2000: 'Good Governance and the Urban Question: On Managing the Contradictions of Neo-Liberalism-Comment on Urban21, June (2000).' Published in German in MieterEcho June 2000.

  • Jessop B., 2002: The future of the capitalist state. Polity Press.

  • Kelly P., 1999: The geographies and politics of globalization, Progress in Human Geography. 23(3): 379-400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr D., 1999: Beheading the king and enthroning the market: a critique of Foucaldian governmentality. Science and Society Summer: 173-202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krause A., 1996: Death of the Guilds: Professions, States, and the Advance of Capitalism, 1930 to the Present. Yale University Press.

  • Larner W., 1998: Sociologies of Neo-liberalism: Theorising the New Zealand Experiment.

  • Larner W., 2001: Governing globalisation: the New Zealand call centre attraction initiative, Environment and Planning A 33(2): 297-313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larner W. and Walters W., 2002: The political rationality of the 'new regionalism': towards a genealogy of the region. Theory and Society (forthcoming).

  • Lauder H., Hughes D., Watson S., Waslander S., Thrupp M., Strathdee R., Simiyu I., Dupuis A., McGlin J. and Hamlin J., 1999: Trading in futures: why markets in education don't work. Open University Press, Buckingham, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauder H., Hughes D., Watson S., Simiyu I., Strathdee R. and Waslander S., 1995: Trading in futures: the nature of choice in educational markets in New Zealand. Ministry of Education, Wellington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, 2000: Restructuring Discourse in the New Zealand Restructuring Experience 1984-95: the practices of the Education Review Office. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Auckland.

  • Lewis N. and Moran W., 1998: Restructuring, Democracy and Geography in New Zealand, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 16: 127-153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis N., Moran W. and Cocklin C., 2002: Restructuring, Reregulation and Sustainability. In: Bowler I., Bryant C. and Cocklin C. (eds), The Sustainability of Rural Systems: Geographical Interpretations. Kluwer (forthcoming).

  • Lough N. (Ministry of Education), 1990 Today's Schools: A Review of the Education Reform Implementation Process. Ministry of Education, Wellington.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon D., 2000: Managerialism, governmentality and the state: a neo-Foucauldian approach to local economic governance. Political Geography 19: 293-314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Majone J., 1996: Regulating Europe. Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marginson S., 1997: Markets in Education. St. Leonards, N.S.W., Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall J., 2000: Bright futures and the knowledge society. In: Marshall J., Coxon E., Jenkins K. and Jones A. (eds), Politics, Policy, Pedagogy: Education in Aotearoa/New Zealand. Palmerston North, Dunmore Press, pp. 187-215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall J., 1999: Technology in the New Zealand curriculum (a decade of reform in New Zealand education: where to now?) New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies 34(1): 167-176.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy C. and Dimitriadis G., 2000: Governmentality and the sociology of education: media, educational policy and the politics of resentment. British Journal of the Sociology of Education 21(2): 169-185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education, 1990: (Lough Report) Today's Schools: A Review of the Education Reform Implementation Process. Ministry of Education, Wellington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran W. and Blunden G. et al., 1996: 'Family Farmers, Real Regulation, and the Experience of Food Regimes.' Journal of Rural Studies 12: 245-258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neilson D., 1998: State Autonomy and the Mode of Political Regulation: Neo-liberal Restructuring in New Zealand, Studies in Political Economy 57: 45-71.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Neill P., 1997: Bringing the qualitative state into economic geography. In: Lee R. and Wills J. (eds), Geographies of Economies. pp. 290-301. Arnold, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peck J., 2002: Political economies of scale: fast policy, interscalar relations, and neoliberal workfare. Economic Geography 78: 331-360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters M., 1992b: Starship Education: enterprise culture in New Zealand. Access 11(1): 1-12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters M., 2001a: 'Education Policy Research and the Global Knowledge Economy'. Access: Critical perspectives on Cultural and Policy Studies in Education 19(2): 90-101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters M., 2001b: 'New Zealand as the 'Knowledge Society': The Foresight Project and the Tertiary White Paper'. Access: Critical perspectives on Cultural and Policy Studies in Education 19(2): 71-89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters M. and Marshall J., 2001: 'Introduction: New Zealand, Neoliberalism and the Knowledge Economy'. Access: Critical perspectives on Cultural and Policy Studies in Education 19(2): 1-8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters M. and Marshall J., 1996: Individualism and Community: Education and Social Policy in the Postmodern Condition. Falmer, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters M. and Olssen M., 1998:Compulsory Education in a Competition State. In: Boston J., Dalziel P. and St John S. (eds), Redesigning the Welfare Sate in New Zealand: Problems, Policies, Prospects. pp. 177-196. Oxford University Press, Auckland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Priestley M., Higham J. and Sharp P., 2000: Local innovation or government initiative? Curriculum specialization in New Zealand's education quasimarket. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies 35(1): 61-78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes M., 2000: Desperately seeking a solution: social democracy, Thatcherism and the 'Third Way' in British welfare. West European Politics 23(2): 161----.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson S., 1998: Quality, Contractualism, and Control: Orchestrating the Sectoral Settlement in Teachers'Work in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies 33(1).

  • Robertson S., 1999a: 'Risky Business': Market Provision, Community Governance and the Individualisation of Risk in New Zealand Education. International Studies in Sociology of Education 9(3).

  • Robertson S., 1999b: Strip away the bark. Expose the heartwood. Get to the heart of the matter: Re/regulating teachers' labour in New Zealand, New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies 34(1): 121-132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson S. and Dale R., 2000: Competitive Contractualism-A New Social Settlement in New Zealand Education. In: Coulby, Cowan and Jones (eds), World Yearbook 2000: Education.

  • Rodger S., Holden J. Meade A., Millar A. and Smith B., 2000: A Review of the Roles and Responsibilities of the Education Review Office. Report to the Minister of Education. Ministry of Education, Wellington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose N., 1992: Governing the enterprising self. In: Heelas P. and Morris P. (eds), The Values of the Enterprise Culture: the moral debate. pp. 141-164. Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose N., 1996: Governing 'Advanced' Liberal Democracies. In: Barry A., Osborne T. and Rose N. (eds), Foucault and Political Reason: Liberalism, Neo-liberalism and Rationalities of Government. The University of Chicago Press.

  • Rose N., 1999: Inventiveness in Politics. Economy and Society 28: 467-493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schick A., 1996: The Spirit of Reform: Managing the New Zealand State Sector in a Time of Change. A Report prepared for the State Services Commission and The Treasury, New Zealand.

  • Schostak J., 1993: Dirty Marks: The Education of Self, Media, and Popular Culture. Pluto Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott G., 1997: The New Institutional Economics and Reshaping the State in New Zealand. In: Davis G., Sullivan B. and Yeatman A. (eds), The New Contractualism? pp. 154-163. Macmillan.

  • Shapiro S., 1999: Education and politics of the 'third way'. Tikkun 14(3): 57-62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teubner G., 1998: Juridification: Concepts, Aspects, Limits, Solutions. In: Baldwin R., Scott C. and Hood C. (eds), A Reader on Regulation. pp. 389-442. Oxford University Press.

  • Thrupp M., 1997c: Shaping a Crisis: The Education Review Office and South Auckland Schools. In: Olssen and Matthews (eds), pp. 145-161.

  • Thrupp M., 1999: A Decade of Reform in New Zealand Education: Where to Now? Special Issue of The New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies. School of Education, University of Waikato.

  • Thrupp M. and Smith R., YEAR? A Decade of ERO. In: Thrupp, M. (ed.), A Decade of Reform in New Zealand Education: Where to Now? Special Issue of The New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies. pp. 186-198. School of Education, University of Waikato.

  • Timperley H., Robinson V. and Bullard T., 1999: Strengthening Education in Mangere and Otara Evaluation. First Evaluation Report. Ministry of Education, Wellington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters W., 1999: Decentering the Economy. Economy and Society 28: 312-323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitty G., 1997: Creating quasi-markets in education: A review of recent research on parental choice and school autonomy in three countries. Review of Research in Education 22: 1-47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lewis, N. Embedding the reforms in New Zealand schooling: After neo-liberalism?. GeoJournal 59, 149–160 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:GEJO.0000019973.08345.f4

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:GEJO.0000019973.08345.f4

Navigation