Skip to main content
Log in

Separable functions in load separation for the ηpl and ηpl CMOD plastic factors estimation

  • Published:
International Journal of Fracture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to develop the load separation method for evaluating the ηpl and ηpl CMOD plastic factors used in the J estimation approach based on load versus displacement records. Appropriate forms for the geometry and deformation functions have been suggested from the EPRI Handbook solutions to produce the separable form for the load. The obtained functions are applied to evaluate the ηpl and ηpl CMOD plastic factors for center cracked tension specimen. The present load separation method gave results which are somewhat different from the estimated values of ηpl given in the literature. For shallow cracks, the ηpl and ηCMOD pl plastic factors show considerable variation with crack size and the strain hardening exponent. For a deeply cracked CCT specimen, the ηCMOD pl factor tends to the ηpl factor and equals approximately unity.

Abbreviations: CCT – center cracked specimen; CMOD – Crack Mouth Opening Displacement; EPRI – Electric Power Research Institute; FEM – Finite Element Method; LLD – Load Line Displacement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, T.L. (1995). Fracture Mechanics: Fundamentals and Applications. CRC Press, Boca Raton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassanelli, A.N., Cocco, R. and de Vedia, L.A. (2003). Separability property and ç pl factor in ASTM A387-Gr22 steel plate. Engineering Fracture Mechanics 70, 1131–1142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joyce, J.A., Hackett, E.M. and Roe, C. (1992). Comparison of J IC and J R Curves for Short Crack and Tensilely Loaded Specimen Geometries of a High Strength Steel. NUREG/CR-5879, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, W. (1968). Singular behavior of the end of a tensile crack in hardening materials. Journal of Mechanics and Physics of Solids 16, 13–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y.-J. and Schwalbe, K.-H. (2001). On the sensitivity of J estimation to materials' stress-strain curves in fracture toughness testing using the finite element method. Journal of Testing and Evaluation 29, 18–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y.-J., Kim, J.-S., Cho, S.-M. and Kim, Y.-J. (2004). 3-D constraint effects on J testing and crack tip constraint in M(T), SE(B), SE(T) and C(T) specimens: numerical study. Engineering Fracture Mechanics 71, 1203–1218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirk, M.T. and Dodds, R.H. (1993). J and CTOD estimation equations for shallow cracks in single edge notch bend specimens. Journal of Testing and Evaluation 21, 228–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, V., German, M.D. and Shih, C.F. (1981). An Engineering Approach for Elastic-Plastic Fracture Analysis. Report EPRI NP-1931, Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lei, Y. and Ainsworth, R.A. (1997). The estimation of J in three-point-bend specimens with a crack in a mismatched weld. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping 70, 247–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matvienko, Yu.G. (1994). J-estimation formulas for non-linear crack problems. International Journal of Fracture 68, R15–R18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matvienko, Yu.G. (1997). Aproximate solution for hardening solids with a crack. Recent Advances in Fracture. (Edited by R.K. Mahidhara, A.B. Geltmacher, K. Sadananda and P. Matic) TMS publ. Warrendale, 307–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Dowd, N.P., Kolednik, O. and Naumenko, V.P. (1999). Elastic-plastic analysis of biaxially loaded center-cracked plates. International Journal of Solids and Structures 36, 5639–5661.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paris, P.C., Ernst, H. and Turner, C.E. (1980). A J-integral approach to development of ç-factors. In Fracture Mechanics: Twelfth Conference, ASTM STP 700. American Society for Testing and Materials. Philadelphia, pp. 338–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, J.R. and Rosengren, G.F. (1968). Plane strain deformation near a crack tip in a power-law hardening materials. Journal of Mechanics and Physics of Solids 16, 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, J.R., Paris, P.D. and Merkle, J.G. (1973). Some further results of J-integral analysis and estimates. In Progress in Flaw Growth and Fracture Toughness Testing, ASTM STP 536. American Society for Testing and Materials. Philadelphia, pp. 231–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwalbe, K.-H. and Zerbst, U. (2000). The engineering treatment model. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping 77, 905–918.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharobeam, M.H. and Landes, J.D. (1991). The load separation criterion and methodology in ductile fracture mechanics. International Journal of Fracture 47, 81–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharobeam, M.H. and Landes, J.D. (1993). A simplified approach for ductile failure analysis of semi-elliptical surface cracks. International Journal of Fracture 61, 379–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharobeam, M.H. and Landes, J.D. (1999). Numerical solutions for ductile behaviour of semi-elliptical surface crack. Engineering Fracture Mechanics 63, 131–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sreenivasan, P.R. and Mannan, S.L. (2000). Plastic ç-factor for three-point bend specimens: analysis of instru-mented Charpy impact test results for AISI 308 weld and AISI 316 stainless steels. International Journal of Fracture 101, 215–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumpter, J.D.G. and Turner, C.E. (1976). Method for laboratory determination of J c.InCracks and Fracture, ASTM STP 601. American Society for Testing and Materials. Philadelphia, pp. 266–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, C.D. and Mani, P. (2002). Plastic J-integral calculations using the load separation method for the center cracked tension specimen. Engineering Fracture Mechanics 69, 887–898.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, S.-X., Mai, Y.-W. and Cotterell, B. (1990). Plastic ç-factor (ç p )of fracture specimens with deep and shallow cracks. International Journal of Fracture 45, 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Matvienko, Y. Separable functions in load separation for the ηpl and ηpl CMOD plastic factors estimation. International Journal of Fracture 129, 265–278 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:FRAC.0000047785.02563.c3

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:FRAC.0000047785.02563.c3

Navigation