Skip to main content
Log in

Single-sample decohesion test: mechanics and implementation

  • Published:
International Journal of Fracture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Single-Sample Decohesion Test (SSDT), developed by the authors, eliminates shortcomings of current interfacial fracture toughness testing methods. In this approach, a highly stressed super layer is used to drive delamination and create any mode mix at the crack tip. SSDT uses the change in crack surface area to vary the available energy per unit area for crack growth and thus to bound the steady state interfacial fracture toughness. Therefore, this technique uses a single sample to measure the interfacial fracture toughness and maintains the advantages of the original decohesion test: (1) SSY conditions, (2) micro-electronics and MEMS representative interfaces, and (3) ability to generate any mode mix. Critical to the usefulness of this test is the availability of a mechanics based analytical model to calculate the test site energy release rate. The test sites are cantilevered thin film strips, which undergo large, nonlinear deflection, consist of multilayered materials, are subject to in-plane biaxial loading, have varying in-plane dimensions, and can be loaded from pure shear to pure peel. In this paper, one dimensional and linear and nonlinear classical laminate plate theories are compared to a finite element representation of the SSDT test site. The regions of applicability of linear and nonlinear analytical models are discussed and nonlinear effects such as the importance of capturing the bifurcation of curvature are highlighted. Application of the nonlinear plate theory model to the test is shown and interfacial fracture toughness results are provided for a Ti/Si interface at several mode mixes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bagchi, A. and Evans, A.G. (1996). The mechanics and physics of thin film decohesion and its measurement. Interface Science 3, 169–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagchi, A., Lucas, G.E., Suo, Z. and Evans, A.G. (1994). A new procedure for measuring the decohesion energy for thin ductile films on substrates. Journal of Materials Research 9(7), 1734–1741.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charalambides, P.G., Lund, J., Evans, A.G., and McMeeking, R.M. (1989). A test specimen for determining the fracture resistance of bimaterial interfaces. Journal of Applied Mechanics 56, 77–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, A.G., Hutchinson, J.W. and Wei, Y. (1999). Interface adhesion: Effects of plasticity and segregation. Acta Materialia 47, 4093–4113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hohlfelder, R.J., Luo, H., Vlassak, J.J., Chidsey, C.E.D. and Nix, W.D. (1997). Measuring interfacial fracture toughness with the blister test. Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings 436, 115–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyer, M.W. (1981). Calculations of the room-temperature shapes of unsymmetric laminates. Journal of Composite Materials 15, 296–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, K-S. (1988). Mechanics of the peel test for thin film adhesion. Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings 119, 31–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masters, C.B. and Salamon, N.J. (1993). Geometrically nonlinear stress-deflection relations for thin film/substrate systems. International Journal of Engineering Science 31(6), 915–925.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Modi, M. and Sitaraman, S.K. (2002). Modified Decohesion Test (MDT) for Interfacial Fracture Toughness Measurement inMicroelectronics/MEMS Applications. Proceedings of 2002 ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, New Orleans, LA.

  • Modi, M., Sitaraman, S.K. and Fork D.K. (2001). Numerical Approximation of the ERR in Intrinsically Stressed Micro-Springs. Proceedings of IPACK'01, Kauai, Hawaii.

  • Reddy, J.N. (1997). Mechanics of Laminated Composite Plates, CRC Press, Boca Raton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, E.O., McGarry, F.J. and Trussel, F. (1994). The edge delamination test: Measuring the critical adhesion energy of thin-film coatings. II. Mode mixity and application. Material Research Society Symposium Proceedings 338, 541–551.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shan, Z. and Sitaraman, S.K. (2003). Elastic-plastic characterization of thin films using nanoindentation technique. Thin Solid Films 437, 176–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D.L., Fork, D.K., Thornton, R.L. and Alimonda, A.S, Chua, C.L., Dunnrowicz, C. and Ho, J. (1998). Flip-Chip Bonding on 6-μm Pitch using Thin-Film Microspring Technology. Proceedings of the 48th Electronics Components and Technology Conference (ECTC), Seattle,Washington, 325–329.

  • Sou, Z. and Hutchinson, J.W. (1990). Interface crack between two elastic layers. International Journal of Fracture 43, 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suhir, E. (1986). Stresses in bi-material thermostats. ASME Journal of Applied Mechanics 53, 657–660.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timoshenko, S.P. (1925). Analysis of bi-metal thermostats. Journal of the Optical Society of America 11, 233–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkatraman, S.K., Kohlstedt, D.L. and Gerberich, W.W. (1993). Metal-ceramic interfacial fracture resistance using the continuous microscratch technique. Thin Solid Films 223, 269–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei, Y. and Hutchinson, J.W. (1997). Nonlinear DelaminationMechanics for Thin Films. Journal of theMechanics and Physics of Solids 45(7), 1137–1159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Modi, M.B., Sitaraman, S.K. Single-sample decohesion test: mechanics and implementation. International Journal of Fracture 129, 1–20 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:FRAC.0000038907.94272.e5

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:FRAC.0000038907.94272.e5

Navigation