Skip to main content
Log in

Cumulative damage analysis based on fatigue damage bounds

  • Published:
International Journal of Fracture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A cumulative damage analysis is presented based on damage curves derived in Ben-Amoz (2003) as bounds on mean fatigue damage in constant amplitude cycling. A detailed analysis is developed for two-stage high-low (H-L) and low-high (L-H) cycling based on single and two-mode bounds. The use of single-mode bounds is questionable as neither bound reflects a crack tip process whereas two-mode bounds reflect the actual process by the presence of both slip and opening-mode damage in each cycle. This leads to results in much closer agreement with experimental data. It is found that to ensure damage irreversibility in L-H cycling the presence of four discrete microstructure barriers obtained in Ben-Amoz (2003) is essential. As a result, two distinct sets of bounds apply: one for H-L another for L-H cycling. The barriers divide the fatigue process into three distinct macro stages while the entire range of lifetimes is divided into five ranges. In L-H cycling different sets of bounds apply to each interval between barriers, hence to each range of lifetimes. A statistical analysis based on an assumed log normal distribution of lifetimes is developed for two-stage H-L and L-H cycling. The bounds lead in a straightforward manner to a median while the variance can only be bracketed by the two-mode and single-mode variances due to exclusion of cyclic hardening as an additional random variable. Predicted residual lifetimes are in close agreement with experimental data in several metals notwithstanding the paucity of data. The two-stage analysis is then generalized to multi stage cycling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ben-Amoz, M. (2003) Bounds on Fatigue Damage: Relation to Microstructure Dependent Crack Growth. International Journal of Fracture 124(3-4), 153–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hashin, Z. (1983) Statistical Cumulative Damage Theory for Fatigue Life Prediction. Journal of Applied Mechanics 50, 571–579.

    Google Scholar 

  • Subramanyan, S. (1976) A Cumulative Damage Rule Based on the Knee Point of the S-N Curve. Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology 98, 316–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, K.J. and Zachariah, K.P. (1977) Cumulative Damage Laws for Fatigue Crack Initiation and Stage I Propagation. Journal of Strain Analysis 12(4), 262–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, K.J. and Ibrahim, M.F.E. (1981) Damage accumulation during Initiation and Short Crack Growth regimes. Fatigue of Engineering Materials and Structures 4(3), 263–277.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ben-Amoz, M. Cumulative damage analysis based on fatigue damage bounds. International Journal of Fracture 129, 75–96 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:FRAC.0000038877.33559.dc

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:FRAC.0000038877.33559.dc

Navigation