Abstract
It is shown that Unnikrishnan’s theory, which is believed to be a local realist theory resolving the EPR puzzle, in two possible interpretations is either realist and nonlocal or local and non-realist.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
C. S. Unnikrishnan,Current Science 79, 195 (2000).
C. S. Unnikrishnan,Ann. Fond. L. de Broglie 25, 363 (2000).
C. S. Unnikrishnan,Found. Phys. Lett. 15, 1 (2002).
C. S. Unnikrishnan,Pramana-J. Phys. 59, 295 (2002).
B. d’Espagnat, quant-ph/0302167 (2003).
J. S. Bell,Physics 1, 195 (1964).
J. F. Clauser and M. A. Home,Phys. Rev. D 10, 526 (1974).
D. Home,Conceptual Foundations of Quantum Physics: An Overview from Modern Perspectives (Plenum, New York, 1997).
K. R. Popper, inOpen Questions in Quantum Mechanics, G. Tarozzi and A.van der Merwe, eds. (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1985).
Y-H. Kim, Y. Shih,Found. Phys. 29, 1849 (1999).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rębilas, K. On the Unnikrishnan resolution of the EPR puzzle. Found Phys Lett 17, 277–286 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:FOPL.0000032477.55284.00
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:FOPL.0000032477.55284.00