Skip to main content
Log in

The EPR Paper and Bohr's Response: A Re-Assessment

  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For many years after Bohr's response to the EPR argument, Bohr was considered to have provided an authoritative rebuttal of the ideas of the paper, and more generally of Einstein's stance on quantum theory. More recently, however, there has been great difficulty even in achieving general agreement on Bohr's meaning. Two recent papers, by Dickson, and by Clifton and Halvorson, have sought to establish the structure of Bohr's argument. In the present paper, the papers of EPR and Bohr are re-assessed in the light of these recent papers, and also in light of the development and presentation of quantum information theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, and N. Rosen, Phys. Rev. 47, 777 (1935).

    Google Scholar 

  2. N. Bohr, Phys. Rev. 48, 696 (1935).

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. S. Bell, J. Phys. (Paris) Colloque C2, Supplément 3, 41 (1981);See footnote 10.

  4. J. S. Bell, Physics 1, 195 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  5. D. Howard, "What makes a classical concept classical?"in Niels Bohr and Contemporary Philosophy, J. Faye and H. J. Folse, eds, (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1994), p. 201.

    Google Scholar 

  6. D. Howard, "Complementarity and ontology: Niels Bohr and the problem of scientific realism in quantum physics, " Ph. D. Dissertation, Boston University, 1979, unpublished.

  7. H. J. Folse, The Philosophy of Niels Bohr:The Framework of Complementarity (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  8. D. Murdoch, Niels Bohr 's Philosophy of Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. Honner, The Philosophy of Nature:Niels Bohr and the Philosophy of Quantum Physics (Clarendon, Oxford, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  10. H. Krips, The Metaphysics of Quantum Theory (Clarendon, Oxford, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. Faye, Niels Bohr:His Heritage and Legacy, An Anti-Realist View of Quantum Mechanics (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. Whitaker, Progress in Quantum Electronics 24, 1 (2000).

  13. E. Schrödinger, Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 108, 555 (1935).

    Google Scholar 

  14. A. Steane, Rep. Prog. Phys. 61, 117 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  15. J. Gruska, Quantum Computing (McGraw-Hill, London, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  16. M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  17. A. Fine, The Shaky Game (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  18. M. Beller and A. Fine, "Bohr 's response to EPR, "in Niels Bohr and Contemporary Philosophy, J. Faye and H. J. Folse, eds, (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1994), pp. 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  19. M. Beller, Quantum Dialogue (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1999), Ch. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  20. H. Halvorson and R. Clifton, "Reconsidering Bohr 's reply to EPR, "in Non-locality and Modality, T. Placek and J. Butterfield, eds, (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 2002), p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  21. M. Dickson, "Bohr on Bell:a proposed reading of Bohr and its implications for Bell 's theorem, "in Non-locality and Modality, T. Placek and J. Butterfield, eds, (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 2002), p. 19.

    Google Scholar 

  22. M. Jammer, The Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics (Wiley, New York, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  23. M. Redhead, Incompleteness, Nonlocality and Realism:A Prolegomenon to the Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  24. J. T. Cushing and E. McMullin, eds, Philosophical Consequences of Quantum Theory: Reflections on Bell 's Theorem (University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  25. J. Jarrett, No us 18, 569 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  26. A. Shimony, in Proceedings of the First International Symposium on the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, S. Kamefuchi et al., eds (Japanese Physical Society, Tokyo, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  27. A. Shimony, in Quantum Concepts in Space and Time, R. Penrose and C. Isham, eds (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  28. J. T. Cushing, "A Bohmian response to Bohr 's complementarity, "in Niels Bohr and Contemporary Philosophy, J. Faye and H. J. Folse, eds, (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1994), pp. 57–75.

    Google Scholar 

  29. N. Bohr, "Discussion with Einstein on epistemological problems in atomic physics, "in Albert Einstein:Philosopher-Scientist, P. A. Schilpp, ed., (Harper & Row, New York, 1949), p. 199.

    Google Scholar 

  30. A. Whitaker, Einstein, Bohr and the Quantum Dilemma (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  31. J. von Neumann, Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1951).

    Google Scholar 

  32. J. S. Bell, Physics World 3 (8), 33 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  33. H. Everett, Rev. Mod. Phys. 29, 454 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  34. A. Einstein, Dialectica 2, 320 (1949). M. Born, ed. The Born-Einstein Letters (Macmillan, London, 1971), pp. 168–173.

    Google Scholar 

  35. H. Halvorson, Lett. Math. Phys. 53, 321 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  36. D. Bohm, Quantum Theory (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1951).

    Google Scholar 

  37. J. S. Bell, Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Experiments, in Proceedings of the Symposium on Frontier Problems in High Energy Physics in Honour of Gilberto Bernardini (Scuola Normale, Pisa, 1976), p. 33.

    Google Scholar 

  38. D. Bohm, Phys. Rev. 85, 166, 180 (1952).

    Google Scholar 

  39. A. Einstein, "Autobiographical notes, "in Albert Einstein:Philosopher-Scientist, P. A. Schilpp, ed. (Harper & Row, New York, 1949), p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  40. A. Einstein, "Reply to criticisms, "in Albert Einstein:Philosopher-Scientist, P. A. Schilpp, ed. (Harper & Row, New York, 1949), p. 665.

    Google Scholar 

  41. A. E. Ruark, Phys. Rev. 48, 466 (1935).

    Google Scholar 

  42. J. Bub and R. Clifton, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 27, 181 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  43. R. Clifton, Br. J. Philos. Sci. 46, 33 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  44. R. Clifton, Br. J. Philos. Sci. 47, 371 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  45. H. Halvorson and R. Clifton, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 38, 2441 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  46. H. P. Stapp, Am. J. Phys. 40, 1098 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  47. E. Schrödinger, Naturwiss. 23, 807, 824, 844 (1935).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Whitaker, M.A.B. The EPR Paper and Bohr's Response: A Re-Assessment. Foundations of Physics 34, 1305–1340 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:FOOP.0000044095.69270.31

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:FOOP.0000044095.69270.31

Navigation