Abstract
For many years after Bohr's response to the EPR argument, Bohr was considered to have provided an authoritative rebuttal of the ideas of the paper, and more generally of Einstein's stance on quantum theory. More recently, however, there has been great difficulty even in achieving general agreement on Bohr's meaning. Two recent papers, by Dickson, and by Clifton and Halvorson, have sought to establish the structure of Bohr's argument. In the present paper, the papers of EPR and Bohr are re-assessed in the light of these recent papers, and also in light of the development and presentation of quantum information theory.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, and N. Rosen, Phys. Rev. 47, 777 (1935).
N. Bohr, Phys. Rev. 48, 696 (1935).
J. S. Bell, J. Phys. (Paris) Colloque C2, Supplément 3, 41 (1981);See footnote 10.
J. S. Bell, Physics 1, 195 (1964).
D. Howard, "What makes a classical concept classical?"in Niels Bohr and Contemporary Philosophy, J. Faye and H. J. Folse, eds, (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1994), p. 201.
D. Howard, "Complementarity and ontology: Niels Bohr and the problem of scientific realism in quantum physics, " Ph. D. Dissertation, Boston University, 1979, unpublished.
H. J. Folse, The Philosophy of Niels Bohr:The Framework of Complementarity (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1985).
D. Murdoch, Niels Bohr 's Philosophy of Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1987).
J. Honner, The Philosophy of Nature:Niels Bohr and the Philosophy of Quantum Physics (Clarendon, Oxford, 1987).
H. Krips, The Metaphysics of Quantum Theory (Clarendon, Oxford, 1987).
J. Faye, Niels Bohr:His Heritage and Legacy, An Anti-Realist View of Quantum Mechanics (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1991).
A. Whitaker, Progress in Quantum Electronics 24, 1 (2000).
E. Schrödinger, Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 108, 555 (1935).
A. Steane, Rep. Prog. Phys. 61, 117 (1998).
J. Gruska, Quantum Computing (McGraw-Hill, London, 1999).
M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000).
A. Fine, The Shaky Game (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1986).
M. Beller and A. Fine, "Bohr 's response to EPR, "in Niels Bohr and Contemporary Philosophy, J. Faye and H. J. Folse, eds, (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1994), pp. 1–31.
M. Beller, Quantum Dialogue (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1999), Ch. 7.
H. Halvorson and R. Clifton, "Reconsidering Bohr 's reply to EPR, "in Non-locality and Modality, T. Placek and J. Butterfield, eds, (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 2002), p. 3.
M. Dickson, "Bohr on Bell:a proposed reading of Bohr and its implications for Bell 's theorem, "in Non-locality and Modality, T. Placek and J. Butterfield, eds, (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 2002), p. 19.
M. Jammer, The Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics (Wiley, New York, 1974).
M. Redhead, Incompleteness, Nonlocality and Realism:A Prolegomenon to the Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1987).
J. T. Cushing and E. McMullin, eds, Philosophical Consequences of Quantum Theory: Reflections on Bell 's Theorem (University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, 1992).
J. Jarrett, No us 18, 569 (1984).
A. Shimony, in Proceedings of the First International Symposium on the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, S. Kamefuchi et al., eds (Japanese Physical Society, Tokyo, 1986).
A. Shimony, in Quantum Concepts in Space and Time, R. Penrose and C. Isham, eds (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1986).
J. T. Cushing, "A Bohmian response to Bohr 's complementarity, "in Niels Bohr and Contemporary Philosophy, J. Faye and H. J. Folse, eds, (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1994), pp. 57–75.
N. Bohr, "Discussion with Einstein on epistemological problems in atomic physics, "in Albert Einstein:Philosopher-Scientist, P. A. Schilpp, ed., (Harper & Row, New York, 1949), p. 199.
A. Whitaker, Einstein, Bohr and the Quantum Dilemma (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996).
J. von Neumann, Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1951).
J. S. Bell, Physics World 3 (8), 33 (1990).
H. Everett, Rev. Mod. Phys. 29, 454 (1957).
A. Einstein, Dialectica 2, 320 (1949). M. Born, ed. The Born-Einstein Letters (Macmillan, London, 1971), pp. 168–173.
H. Halvorson, Lett. Math. Phys. 53, 321 (2000).
D. Bohm, Quantum Theory (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1951).
J. S. Bell, Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Experiments, in Proceedings of the Symposium on Frontier Problems in High Energy Physics in Honour of Gilberto Bernardini (Scuola Normale, Pisa, 1976), p. 33.
D. Bohm, Phys. Rev. 85, 166, 180 (1952).
A. Einstein, "Autobiographical notes, "in Albert Einstein:Philosopher-Scientist, P. A. Schilpp, ed. (Harper & Row, New York, 1949), p. 1.
A. Einstein, "Reply to criticisms, "in Albert Einstein:Philosopher-Scientist, P. A. Schilpp, ed. (Harper & Row, New York, 1949), p. 665.
A. E. Ruark, Phys. Rev. 48, 466 (1935).
J. Bub and R. Clifton, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 27, 181 (1996).
R. Clifton, Br. J. Philos. Sci. 46, 33 (1995).
R. Clifton, Br. J. Philos. Sci. 47, 371 (1996).
H. Halvorson and R. Clifton, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 38, 2441 (1999).
H. P. Stapp, Am. J. Phys. 40, 1098 (1972).
E. Schrödinger, Naturwiss. 23, 807, 824, 844 (1935).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Whitaker, M.A.B. The EPR Paper and Bohr's Response: A Re-Assessment. Foundations of Physics 34, 1305–1340 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:FOOP.0000044095.69270.31
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:FOOP.0000044095.69270.31