Skip to main content
Log in

Re-Examining the Performance of MRP and Kanban Material Control Strategies for Multi-Product Flexible Manufacturing Systems

  • Published:
International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Material control schemes can be classified as push, pull, or hybrid strategies. This article compares the performance of MRP (push) and kanban (pull) for a multi-stage, multi-product manufacturing system. Using simulation experiments we analyze system performance under different product mixes and observe that in certain environments with advance demand information kanban-based pull strategies can lead to significant inefficiencies. In these environments MRP-type push strategies yield better performance in terms of inventories and service levels. We also study the impact of design parameters such as safety lead time and safety stock policies on system performance and observe that for low and medium values of system loads, safety lead time policies yield better system performance than safety stock policies. These insights can be helpful in designing efficient MRP-type push strategies in multi-product environments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Berkley, B. J., “A Review of Kanban Production Control Research Literature,” Production and Operations Management,Vol. 1, No. 4, pp. 393–411 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Buzacott, J. A., “Queueing Models of Kanban and MRP Controlled Production Systems,” Engineering Costs and Production Economics,Vol. 17, pp. 3–20 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • Buzacott, J. A., Price, S. M., and Shanthikumar, J. G., “Service Level in Multistage MRPand Base Stock Controlled Production Systems,” New Directions for Operations Research,G.Fandel, T. Gulledge, and A. Jones (Eds.), Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, pp. 445–463 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  • Buzacott, J. A. and Shanthikumar, J. G., Stochastic Models of Manufacturing Systems, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Buzacott, J. A. and Shanthikumar, J. G., “Safety Stock Versus Safety Times in MRP Controlled Production Systems,” Management Science,Vol. 40, No. 12, pp. 1678–1689 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • Canavos, G. C., Applied Probability and Statistical Methods, Little Brown and Company, Boston, MA (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericksen, P. D. and Suri, R., “Managing the Extended Enterprise,” Purchasing Today,Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 58–63 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gstettner, S. and Kuhn, H., “Analysis of Production Control Systems: Kanban and CONWIP,” International Journal of Production Research,Vol. 34, No. 11, pp. 3253–3273 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopp, W. and Spearman, M., Factory Physics: Foundations of Factory Management, Irwin/McGrawHill, Chicago, IL (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • Karaesmen, F., Buzacott, J. A., and Dallery, Y., “Integrating Advance Order Information in Production Control,” IIE Transactions,Vol. 34, pp. 649–662 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  • Karaesmen, F., Liberopoulos, G., and Dallery, Y., “Production/Inventory Control with Advance Demand In-formation,” Stochastic Modeling and Optimization of Manufacturing Systems and Supply Chains,J.G. Shanthikumar, D. D. Yao, and W. H. M. Zijm (Eds.), International Series in Operations Research and Man-agement Science, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 243–270 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  • Karmarkar, U. S., “Push, Pull and Hybrid Control Schemes,” Tijdschrift voor Economie en Management,Vol. 26, pp. 345–363 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • Karmarkar, U. S., “Lot Sizes, Lead Times and In-Process Inventories,” Management Science,Vol. 33, No. 3, pp. 409–418 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • Knott, K. and Sury, R. J., “A Study of Work-time Distributions on Unpaced Tasks,” IIE Transactions,Vol. 19, pp. 50–55 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambrecht, M. R., Muckstadt, J. A., and Luyten, R., “Protective Stocks in Multi-Stage Production Systems,” International Journal of Production Research,Vol. 22, pp. 1001–1025 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  • Liberopoulos, G. and Dallery, Y., “AUnified Framework for Pull Control Mechanisms in Multistage Manufacturing Systems,” Annals of Operations Research,Vol. 93, pp. 325–355 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  • Muckstadt, J. A. and Tayur, S. R., “A Comparison of Alternative Kanban Control Mechanisms-II. Experimental Results,” IIE Transactions,Vol. 27, No. 2, pp. 151–161 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlicky, J., Materials Requirement Planning, McGraw Hill, New York, NY (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  • Spearman, M. L., Woodruff, D. L., and Hopp, W. J., “CONWIP: A Pull Alternative to Kanban,” International Journal of Production Research,Vol. 28, No. 5, pp. 879–894 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • Spearman, M. L. and Zazanis, M. A., “Push and Pull Production Systems: Issues and Comparisons,” Operations Research,Vol. 40, No. 3, pp. 521–532 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Suri, R., Quick Response Manufacturing: A Companywide Approach to Reducing Lead Times, Productivity Press, Portland, OR (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • Suri, R., “Quick Response Manufacturing: A Competitive Strategy for the 21st Century,” Proceedings of the Quick Response Manufacturing 2000 Conference, Rajan Suri (Ed.), Society of Manufacturing Engineers, Dearborn, MI, pp. 1–27 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  • Suri, R. and de Treville, S., “Getting from 'Just-in-Case' to 'Just-in-Time': Insights from a Simple Model,” Journal of Operations Management,Vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 295–304 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tayur, S. R., “Properties of Serial Kanban Lines,” Queueing Systems,Vol. 12, pp. 297–318 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Uzsoy, R. and Martin-Vega, L. A., “Modeling Kanban-based Demand-Pull Systems: A Survey and Critique,” Manufacturing Review,Vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 155–160 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vollmann, T. E., Berry, W. L., and Whybark, D. C., Manufacturing Planning and Control Systems,Dow Jones-Irwin, Homewood, IL (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • Womack, J. P. and Jones, D. T., Lean Thinking: Banish Waste and Create Wealth in your Corporation, Simon and Schuster, New York, NY (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, X., Luh, P. B., and Tomastik, R. N., “The Performance of a NewMaterial Control and Replenishment System: A Simulation and Comparative Study,” Proceedings of the Quick Response Manufacturing 2000 Conference, Rajan Suri, Editor, Society of Manufacturing Engineers, Dearborn, MI, pp. 805–826 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Krishnamurthy, A., Suri, R. & Vernon, M. Re-Examining the Performance of MRP and Kanban Material Control Strategies for Multi-Product Flexible Manufacturing Systems. International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing Systems 16, 123–150 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:FLEX.0000044837.86194.19

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:FLEX.0000044837.86194.19

Navigation