Skip to main content
Log in

Time-Based Competition in Multistage Manufacturing: Stream-of-Variation Analysis (SOVA) Methodology—Review

  • Published:
International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Frequency of model change and the vast amounts of time and cost required to make a changeover, also called time-based competition, has become a characteristic feature of modern manufacturing and new product development in automotive, aerospace, and other industries. This paper discusses the concept of time-based competition in manufacturing and design based on a review of on-going research related to stream-of-variation (SOVA or SoV) methodology. The SOVA methodology focuses on the development of modeling, analysis, and control of dimensional variation in complex multistage assembly processes (MAP) such as the automotive, aerospace, appliance, and electronics industries. The presented methodology can help in eliminating costly trial-and-error fine-tuning of new-product assembly processes attributable to unforeseen dimensional errors throughout the assembly process from design through ramp-up and production. Implemented during the product design phase, the method will produce math-based predictions of potential downstream assembly problems, based on evaluations of the design and a large array of process variables. By integrating product and process design in a pre-production simulation, SOVA can head off individual assembly errors that contribute to an accumulating set of dimensional variations, which ultimately result in out-of-tolerance parts and products. Once in the ramp-up stage of production, SOVA will be able to compare predicted misalignments with actual measurements to determine the degree of mismatch in the assemblies, diagnose the root causes of errors, isolate the sources from other assembly steps, and then, on the basis of the SOVA model and product measurements, recommend solutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Apley, D.W. and Shi, J., “Diagnosis of Multiple Fixture Faults in Panel Assembly,” ASME Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, Vol. 120, pp. 793–801 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, J., “Dimensional Analysis and Process Control of Body-In-White Processes,” Ph. D. Dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollinger, J. E. ( Ed. ), Visionary Manufacturing Challenges for 2020, Committee on Visionary Manufacturing Challenges, National Research Council, National Academy Press, Washington, DC (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cai, W., Hu, S. J., and Yuan J. X., “Deformable Sheet Metal Fixturing: Principles, Algorithms, and Simulations,” Transactions of ASME, Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, Vol. 118, No. 3, pp. 318–324 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • Camelio, J., Hu, S. J., and Ceglarek, D., “Modeling Variation Propagation of Multi-Station Assembly Systems with Compliant Parts,” Transactions of ASME, Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 125, No. 4, pp. 673–681 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceglarek, D., “Knowledge-Based Diagnosis for Automotive Body Assembly: Methodology and Implementation,” Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceglarek, D. and Shi, J., “Dimensional Variation Reduction for Automotive Body Assembly Manufacturing,” Manufacturing Review, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 139–154 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceglarek, D. and Shi, J., “Fixture Failure Diagnosis for Auto Body Assembly Using Patter Recognition,” ASME Transactions, Journal of Engineering for Industry, Vol. 118, No. 1, pp. 55–65 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceglarek, D. and Shi, J., “Design Evaluation of Sheet Metal Joints for Dimensional Integrity,” Transactions of ASME, Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, Vol. 120, No. 2, pp. 452–460 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceglarek, D., Shi, J., and Wu, S. M., “A Knowledge-Based Diagnosis Approach for the Launch of the Auto-Body Assembly Process,” Transactions of ASME, Journal of Engineering for Industry, Vol. 116, No. 4, pp. 491–499 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chase, K.W. and Parkinson, A. R., “A Survey of Research in the Application of Tolerance Analysis to the Design of Mechanical Assemblies,” Res. Eng. Design, Vol. 3, pp. 23–37 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • CIRP, “Flexible Automation-Assessment and Future,” CIRP Scientific Technical Committee Survey in USA, Europe and Japan (January 27, 2000).

  • DCS, 3D Variation Simulation, Dimensional Control Systems, Inc. (2000).

  • Ding, Y., Ceglarek, D., and Shi, J., “Modeling and Diagnosis of Multistage Manufacturing Process: Part I State Space Model,” Proceedings of 2000 Japan-USA Symposium on Flexible Automation, July 23-26, Ann Arbor, MI, 2000JUSFA-13146 (2000).

  • Ding, Y., Ceglarek, D., and Shi, J., “Design Evaluation of Multi-station Assembly Processes by Using State Space Approach,” ASME Transactions, Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 124, No. 3, pp. 408–418 (2002a).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ding, Y., Ceglarek, D., and Shi, J., “Fault Diagnosis of Multistage Manufacturing Processes by Using State Space Approach,” ASME Transactions, Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, Vol. 124, No. 2, pp. 313–322 (2002b).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ding, Y., Shi, J., and Ceglarek, D., “Diagnosability Analysis of Multistage Manufacturing Processes,” ASME Transactions, Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, Vol. 124, No. 1, pp. 1–13 (2002c).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ding, Y., Kim, P., Ceglarek, D., and Jin, J., “Optimal Sensor Distribution for Variation Diagnosis in Multi-Station Manufacturing Processes,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, Vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 543–556 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  • El-Gizawy, A. S., Hwang, J.-Y., and Brewer, D. H., “A Strategy for Integrating Product and Process Design of Aerospace Components,” Manufacturing Review, Vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 178–186 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • ERC-RMS, National Science Foundation-Engineering Research Center for Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems (ERC-RMS), Technical Report, University of Michigan (1999).

  • Gadh, R., “A Hybrid Approach to Intelligent Geometric Design Using Features-Based Design and Feature Recognition,” Proceedings of the 19th Annual ASME Design Automation Conference, Vol. DE-65, No. 2, pp. 273–283 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerwin, D. and Barrowman, N. J., “An Evaluation of Research on Integrated Product Development,” Management Science, Vol. 48, No. 7, pp. 938–953 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  • Greer, D., “On-line Machine Vision Sensor Measurements in a Coordinate System,” SME Paper #IQ88-289 (1988).

  • Hu, S. J., “Impact of 100% Measurement Data on Statistical Process Control (SPC) in Automobile Body Assembly,” Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, S. J., “Stream-of-Variation Theory for Automotive Body Assemblies,” Annals of CIRP, Vol. 46, No. 1, pp. 1–6 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, S. and Wu, S. M., “Identifying Root Causes of Variation in Automobile Body Assembly Using Principal Component Analysis,” Transactions of NAMRI, Vol. 20, pp. 311–316 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, W., Kong, Z., Ceglarek, D., and Brahmst, E., “The Analysis of Feature-Based Measurement Error in Coordinate Metrology,” IIE Transactions on Design and Manufacturing, Vol. 36, No. 3, pp. 237–251 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jin, J. and Shi, J., “State Space Modeling of Sheet Metal Assembly for Dimensional Control,” ASME Transactions, Journal of Manufacturing Science & Engineering, Vol. 121, pp. 756–762 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan, A., Ceglarek, D., and Ni, J., “Sensor Location Optimization for Fault Diagnosis in Multi-Fixture Assembly Systems,” Transactions of ASME, Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, Vol. 120, No. 4, pp. 781–792 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan, A., Ceglarek, D., Shi, J., Ni, J., and Woo, T. C., “Sensor Optimization for Fault Diagnosis in Single Fixture Systems: A Methodology,” ASME Transaction, Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, Vol. 121, pp. 109–117 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  • Koren, Y., Heisel, U., Jovane, F., Moriwaki, T., Pritschow, G., Ulsoy, G. A., and Brussel, H., “Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems,” Annals of CIRP, Vol. 50, No. 2 (1999).

  • Lawless, J. F., Mackay, R. J., and Robinson, J. A., “Analysis of Variation Transmission in Manufacturing Processes-Part I,” Jouranal of Quality Technology, Vol. 31, pp. 131–142 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mantripragada, R. and Whitney, D. E., “Modeling and ControllingVariation Propagation in Mechanical Assemblies Using State Transition Models,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, Vol. 15, pp. 124–140 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehrabi, M. G., Ulsoy, A. G., and Koren, Y., “Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems: Key to Future Manufacturing,” Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 403–419 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  • Menassa, R. J. and DeVries, W. R., “Locating Point Synthesis in Fixture Design,” Annals of CIRP, Vol. 38, No. 1, pp. 165–169 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkinson, A., Sorensen, C., and Pourhassan, N., “A General Approach for Robust Optimal Design,” Transactions of ASME, Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 115, No. 1, pp. 74–80 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Perceptron, 1000, “Measurement System Manual,” Perceptron Inc. (1991).

  • Sekine, Y., Koyama, S., and Imazu, H., “Nissan's New Production System: Intelligent Body Assembly System,” SAE Technical Paper Series, 910816, pp. 1–12 (1991).

  • Shalon, D., Gossard, D., Ulrich, K., and Fitzpatrick, D., “Representing Geometric Variations in Complex Structural Assemblies on CAD Systems,” Proceedings of the 19th Annual ASME Advances in Design Automation Conference, Vol. DE-44, No. 2, pp. 121–132 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Suri, R., Quick Response Manufacturing: A Company wide Approach to Reducing Lead Times, Productivity Press (1998).

  • Takezawa, N., “An Improved Method for Establishing the Process-Wise Quality Standard” Rep. Stat. Appl. Res., JUSE, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp. 63–75 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomke, S. and Fujimoto, T., “The Effect of “Front-Loading” Problem-Solving on Product Development Performance,” Journal of Production Innovation Management, Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 128–142 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, K., Sartorius, D., Pearson, S., and Jakiela, M., “Including the Value of Time in Design-for-Manufacturing Decision-Making,” Management Science, Vol. 39, No. 4, pp. 429–447 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ceglarek, D., Huang, W., Zhou, S. et al. Time-Based Competition in Multistage Manufacturing: Stream-of-Variation Analysis (SOVA) Methodology—Review. International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing Systems 16, 11–44 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:FLEX.0000039171.25141.a4

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:FLEX.0000039171.25141.a4

Navigation